Mail Archive Search: <+from:barryb@i1.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:barryb@i1.net: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Maybe correct format this time (score: 1): Author: barryb@i1.net (Barry Baker); Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 20:23:35 -0600; Steve, Thanks for the help in getting these protocals set-up. Barry KC0LCL ________________________________________________________________________ Where do you get ICE bandpass filters & beverage ma; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00548.html (6,957 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Short Tower Antenna (score: 1): Author: barryb@i1.net (Barry Baker); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 06:17:41 -0600; Hello to the group. My call is KC0LCL. Given a choice of running a Hex-Beam at 40' which is its reccommended height or Something like the KT36XA from M2 technologies at the same height. 40' is pretty; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00570.html (8,775 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Foundation too close to Tower?? (score: 1): Author: barryb@i1.net (Barry Baker); Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 06:36:34 -0600; Tower is a US Tower Model TMM-433HD. Base requirement is 4'x4'x5'deep. Building inspector at city hall says base must be 5' from the home's foundation. He based this statement on the fact I am going; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00571.html (9,205 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Summary: Short Tower and Close Foundation (score: 1): Author: barryb@i1.net (Barry Baker); Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2002 05:50:40 -0600; Thanks to everyone for such a great response. The summary is as follows: Tower is too short \\\\4 votes (cheapen up the antenna and put the dollars into the tower) (60' will work better) 40' tall tow; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-01/msg00612.html (9,256 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]