Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:baycock@direcway.com: 150 ]

Total 150 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] I think K7NV should be ashamed of this. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2003 06:40:27 -0600
Kurt- I appreciate your work, in the fullest sense. And- I hope my comments do not cause you to pull yourself off the web, or your contributions from others (more worthy than I) As I said, I do not m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00180.html (10,452 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Another Fulton Winch (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 17:21:19 -0600
It's possible that there is a better winch from Fulton for this job. Several years ago I needed to replace the winch I got on a Rohn Fold-over, and contacted Fulton and some others. I found a 2000 po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00257.html (9,854 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn<<<<<warning >>>>>>>>>> (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 00:41:00 -0600
Jeremy , in a blast of frustration poured out some bad language to get out attention. His frustration is caused by his own failure to learn how the system works. In every post sent out by the list, i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00385.html (11,097 bytes)

24. Fwd: Re: [TowerTalk] The cable must be Times... (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 06:28:03 -0600
Spam detection software, running on the system "dayton.akorn.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00668.html (11,648 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Look at his response (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:49:05 -0600
If that photo fits your definition of pornography, I pity you- if there are many with that view, I pity the rest of us. Bill At 06:45 PM 2/22/2004 -0700, you wrote: I'll consider the source.......any
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00470.html (7,647 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Look at his response (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:26:30 -0600
Joe- Don't misunderstand me- I do NOT think it should have been posted to TT. For several reasons, none of which label that silly pic as "Pornography". Bill At 08:49 AM 2/23/2004 -0700, you wrote: It
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-02/msg00512.html (9,585 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground rod connectors (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 07:37:25 -0600
Gene-thanks for the information. I may be able to make use of it, but-- (I do not expect Gene to answer this- it's not his responsibility) HOW IN H** DO YOU GET EVEN A STAB AT A PRICE? I drop any con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00213.html (8,484 bytes)

28. RE: [TowerTalk] static cat (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 10:59:47 -0600
I am puzzled about the phrase "under threat of lawsuits." Who was threatening, who were they threatening, and what was the substance of the threats? You left us hanging. Bill At 02:49 PM 3/21/2004 +0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00383.html (10,111 bytes)

29. RE: [TowerTalk] static cat (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 17:37:00 -0600
David- Thanks much; it's about as I suspected;and the bottom line was an opportunity for some Lawyers to enhance their retirement funds. It sounds like they were trying to punish the reviewers for me
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00398.html (12,377 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: static cat (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 19:29:33 -0600
Didier- IMHO, your first paragraph has such fundamental errors that the rest cannot be supported. The charge on the earth side is NOT uniform over miles; the earth is not a superconductor and has fin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00406.html (12,800 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Static, Lightening, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 23:24:32 -0600
I agree with the comment about "voting" on scientific theories. There was a time when people thought that the weather could be predicted, but they found out that only the probability of the weather w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00512.html (11,290 bytes)

32. RE: [TowerTalk] Static, Lightening, and protection (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 13:33:53 -0600
I have one MAJOR disagreement with this argument of Davids- One is NOT trying to attract lightning to the tower- one is trying to provide an easy path to bleed down the charge (opposite in sign to th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00538.html (11,390 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] Top Ten Reasons to THINK before typing (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 16:32:46 -0500
Bill- if you have to ask silly questions- why repeat the WHOLE thing? I think they should stop, too. At 03:45 PM 4/27/2004 -0400, you wrote: K7LXC....do we have rules against this kind of garbage? Bi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00549.html (7,732 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] BPL: Presidential Backing (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 10:11:06 -0500
Without going to your second paragraph, I could tell that you are not a ham. You attribute our desires only to the "bottom line" and not to other personal feelings. Most Hams ARE on the net, but not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00558.html (13,109 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Co-ax, (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:04:21 -0500
At 09:36 PM 4/28/2004 -0400, you wrote: SNIP I agree with you on the selection. But I've never in my life seen a cable wick up water in the dielectric. I've never had a center conductor migrate eithe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00599.html (7,923 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] CDE HAM II Rotor . . . another question (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 22:06:29 -0500
Steve- the problem may be in calibration, not the resistor. My CDE Ham III has a simple procedure, and I think the type II is the same. A slightly shortened version is: Turn the unit on and turn the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-05/msg00578.html (10,419 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] URI magic antennas (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 14:36:21 -0500
At 07:51 AM 6/8/2004 -0400, you (Larry Phelps) wrote: S N I P If URI's claims are proven false, the devil will be in the measurement techniques. Larry N8LP What measurements?, What techniques? I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00174.html (9,648 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] [Fwd: BPL Comments] (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 14:04:11 -0500
At 06:00 PM 7/1/2004 -0500, you wrote: Lone Star DX Association prez. Bill, W5SJ found the following BPL comments and asked me to forward them to the reflector since he was having bounce problems wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00045.html (8,491 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Lighting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 07:01:50 -0500
Funny how some simple things are forgotten. I have two "grounding straps" that came with solid state components. The instructions told me to wrap the velcro band around my wrist, with the metal plate
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00240.html (14,892 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Lighting (score: 1)
Author: Bill Aycock <baycock@direcway.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2004 09:30:42 -0500
Kelly and JimI'm surprised at the counter-arguments, apparently without seeing the parallels. If I work on the stuff without a strap, I can build a charge difference by my natural motion in the air o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00248.html (11,076 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu