Mail Archive Search: <+from:bbowers@townsqr.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:bbowers@townsqr.com: 87 ]

Total 87 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 14:45:26 -0500; What are the mandates? I haven't heard what is going on in that Wireless phase 2, which most (if not all) of the available solutions require digital phones, and a mandate from the FCC to go digital.; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00758.html (7,751 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] new to group (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 20:56:17 -0500; Just as an aside, I bought a number of sections from Sammy, and was very happy, in fact he went out of his way to meet me with them. Right now can be _______________________________________________ S; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00461.html (7,256 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] My Tower cost (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:39:25 -0500; Exactly, which was my point, to whoever made the post. _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and l; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00512.html (8,202 bytes)
24. Re: [TowerTalk] non-hams on Towertalk (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:58:35 -0500; who see their Well, as a HAM, and a tower owner with towers from Maine to OK, I hardly ever put my callsign on my posts, but here goes.... KD4RME www.frostytowers.com _______________________________; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-08/msg00609.html (9,183 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Forest Service land (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:42:22 -0500; Anyone had any DIRECT experience dealing with putting HAM repeaters on towers located on USFS land, but owned by other than the USFS? _______________________________________________ See: http://www.m; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00078.html (6,637 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] FCC Tower Registration (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:52:52 -0500; A few years ago a ham wrote an article in QST about how he got a cell phone company to locate a cell site on his property (actually they approached him like the radio station has done with you) and t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00214.html (9,022 bytes)
27. [TowerTalk] (no subject) (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:55:46 -0500; Well this is kind of tower oriented. Have any of you been approached by wind turbine folks wanting to set up a wind turbine farm in the area? I Most of the wind turbine fields are still experimental,; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00236.html (7,656 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] FCC Tower Registration (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:57:10 -0500; I have been approached by a commercial FM broadcast station that wants to put a transponder near my town and they would like to put it on one of my towers. What is the upside and downside of this kin; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00237.html (9,360 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] Disturbing tower picture in QST (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:14:59 -0500; I received a reply from Steve Ford, WB8IMY, who is the editor of QST. He assured me that all three gentlemen were wearing climbing belts, although they are not visible in the picture. Belts? Not harn; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00306.html (8,863 bytes)
30. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Not exactly BPL (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 10:59:41 -0500; Wow. You mean that the thousands of Wireless Internet providers across the US that are presently providing high speed broadband internet are not successful? (Those that are using towers?) Tod I'd bet; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00392.html (7,626 bytes)
31. [TowerTalk] Just a note (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 22:53:17 -0500; I just was pleasently surprised tonite, when in my email there was a note from a gentleman who represents a number of HAMs, that were thanking me for giving space on one of my towers for a 70cm repea; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00482.html (7,106 bytes)
32. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 22, Issue 110 (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 14:19:48 -0600; 1. Formal attire at State Dinners would devolve to striped Bermuda shorts worn with checked shirts and semi-high argyle socks...plus a hat with a substitute rubber duck clipped to the brim... This is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00817.html (7,898 bytes)
33. [TowerTalk] Hagerstown MD (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:22:08 -0600; Anyone in the Hagerstown MD area? Need a tower site? FREE RENT! _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00621.html (6,916 bytes)
34. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower ID Help and any suggestions... (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:31:24 -0600; I have just obtained a 21 foot(collapsed) crank up Mast of the Tri-Ex Sky Needle type tower. I have not had it fully extended as of yet, and am looking for two things if possible... 1. How can I ID t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00134.html (10,188 bytes)
35. Re: [TowerTalk] tower wenches (was fcc chair) (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:17:54 -0600; I thought we were talking about buying a ground rod driver, not the girl..... On Sunday 23 January 2005 05:18 pm, Gene Smar wrote: This? http://www.groundhawgs.com/ Thats just too ugly. When building; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01033.html (9,588 bytes)
36. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 14:52:48 -0600; Actually, Rohn fully supports the R25 up to 40 feet as a self support. Aside from that however, 60 feet they do not support, and supporting an inverted V would be an absolute no-no. I have seen R25 a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01219.html (8,921 bytes)
37. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:21:04 -0600; Page 25G-1, and page 25G-2 of the Rohn consumer catalog. Their design charts, their design drawings. Blake: I beg to differ with you. Using TIA/EIA 222-F wind loading criteria and 70 mph wind velocit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01223.html (9,083 bytes)
38. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:11:35 -0600; I am sorry you don't have the proper information, it can also be found in the Rohn commercial catalog, there is not a page number, but it is the 7th and 8th page in from the Rohn 25 tab, right after; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01227.html (9,284 bytes)
39. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn 25 (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 17:52:25 -0600; Well you are correct in that it is shown in the consumer catalog and the chart is dated 1987 and references 222-E. 222-F the latest standard differs from 222-E. I would not bet on a 40' 25g and ever; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01231.html (8,595 bytes)
40. Re: [TowerTalk] Knock it off--- warnings (score: 1): Author: Blake Bowers <bbowers@townsqr.com>; Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 08:08:31 -0600; I fail to see what is the problem, although it does seem to be running long... What is not adult about warning other people about a possible issue with a vendor? I am not saying anyone is right or wr; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-02/msg00303.html (7,937 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 40
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]