Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:brunet@us.ibm.com: 42 ]

Total 42 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] one 80m dipole for 3.5 through 4.0 (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 1999 13:49:42 -0500
Are their designs for 80m dipoles covering 3.5 through 4.0 preferably without a trip to the antenna? Sounds like the search for the holy grail. Some ideas: 1) a pair of dipoles with one feedpoint, on
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00204.html (8,683 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] t2x specs, mast weight (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 09:59:04 -0500
Does anyone have the specs on the T2X for: wind load, rotational torque, weight? I am looking at some yaesu rotor specs and I see stationary torque specs too. Do I need to be concerned about that spe
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00013.html (7,303 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] t2x, c31xr and ef240x (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 13:28:00 -0500
It looks like the T2X can't handle a C31XR and a EF240X. The torque spec on the T2X is 3400 ft lbs (weight x turning radius). The turning radius of the EF240X is 25.1' the weight of the two antennas
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00020.html (8,473 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] t2x, c31xr and ef240x (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 18:59:43 -0500
Ty says... No, incorrect. It's not nearly that simple to calculate and has little to do the turning radius. It has to do with moment arm for each significant piece. You can essentially eliminate the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00038.html (8,951 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] lightening and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top of mast (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 15:04:19 -0500
If a triband vertical (2m-70cm) was placed on top of a mast at the 74 foot level would it be prone to lightening strikes? Would it be better side mount it on the tower? The loss in coverage due to th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00185.html (7,697 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] wire antennas supported by tower, how close to top (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 1999 15:17:38 -0500
I assume that a 30m or 80m inverted vee could cause interaction to a yagi (40m-10m c36xr for example) in a similar fashion that a 40m yagi can cause interaction with a tribander. If so what is the mi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00186.html (7,298 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] lightning and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top of mast (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Wed, 8 Sep 1999 09:47:38 -0500
If we used a side mount, would a small 2m/70cm yagi be less likely to suffer damage than our Diamond tribander (2m-70cm)? If so, should we side mount the yagi with a very small rotator and pick the p
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00197.html (7,193 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] interaction: 10m-40m (C36XR), 12//17m (WARC 2/2) (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:10:29 -0500
Concerning destructive interaction between yagis, most of the what I have heard is interaction between 15 and 40 when one is over the other. The same frequency relationships don't seem to be found be
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00215.html (7,648 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] lightening and uhf/vhf triband vertical on top ofmast (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 1999 11:17:38 -0500
Bob, Can you tell me more about the diverters? If the tip of the 2m-70cm were about 10' down from the yagi would that help shield the vertical? Thanks, Pete -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00216.html (7,102 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] guying for rohn 25G at 50' (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 09:57:42 -0500
What does the Rohn catalog show for the guy points for Rohn 25G at 50' at various wind speeds? I have a copy of the charts for 45G and it shows 41' on the tower and 40' out from the base for 70, 90,
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00007.html (7,154 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] C31XR and XM240, which one on top, how big a mast (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:46:17 -0500
Hi, Is there a convention as to whether a 40m yagi should go on the top or bottom? Is a 15' mast enough or is 20' needed? Thanks, Pete ws4g -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00178.html (7,355 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] warc with C-32XR, XM240? (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 10:47:47 -0500
Which if any warc bands can be worked with a C-31XR and/or XM240? Thanks, Pete ws4g -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative req
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00179.html (7,023 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] C31XR and XM240, which one on top, how big a mast (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:36:24 -0500
You mean total mast length or mast sticking out of the tower? It's been my limited experience that you need at least 10 feet of spacing for an XM240 and more would be better. Let's assume 40m is on t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00181.html (7,896 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] warc with C-32XR, XM240? (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 12:45:15 -0500
Ken, K6DB says: My XM240 works quite well on 12 meters, without a tuner. Ken, How aout 30m? Apparently the 40-2CD worked OK with a tuner there. -Pete -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertal
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00183.html (7,020 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] wind load revisited (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 17:03:47 -0500
I looked through my notes from a discussion on this reflector a while back and want to rediscuss it just to be sure our plans are OK. Let's assume 70' of 45G at 70mph. The flat spec is 9.5 sq ft. Sin
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00191.html (7,793 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] C-32XR, XM24 - rotor (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1999 09:11:08 -0500
What rotors would be candidates for turning the C-31XR and XM240 with a 20' chromemolly mast? Thanks, Pete ws4g -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00202.html (7,168 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] KT34XA cap colors (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 15:49:51 -0500
What is the latest color? I am in the process of rebuilding and have a set of light blue ones from about 6 years ago or longer. Do I need to reorder? Thanks, Pete ws4g -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00164.html (7,248 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] looking for a tower/antenna installer (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 1999 10:55:17 -0500
I am interested in a developing a list of qualified and experienced professional HF tower/antenna installers with all the appropriate insurance/bonds/references etc. This is for a fairly small job, i
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-06/msg00330.html (7,190 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] kt34xa rebuild - cleaning inside clamps (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 09:08:22 -0500
For those of you that have rebuilt KT34s, what technique did you use to clean inside the clamps. I thought of buying a round file. Any other ideas? Also, do you recommend disassembling everything on
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-05/msg00217.html (7,867 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] tower maintenance intervals (score: 1)
Author: brunet@us.ibm.com (brunet@us.ibm.com)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 17:14:00 -0600
Our club is evaluating a Hazer system vs. the cost of paying a professional to climb the tower when maintenance is needed. We are rebuilding a TailTwister and a KT34XA prior to installation. Since th
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00265.html (7,525 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu