Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ccc@space.mit.edu: 187 ]

Total 187 documents matching your query.

121. [Towertalk] Low dipoles (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:13:23 -0500
Makes sense. While the sun is up, D-region absorption murders low-angle propagation on 40 m, so a "sky warmer" is relatively advantaged. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00035.html (8,179 bytes)

122. [Towertalk] Low dipoles (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 13:31:16 -0500
Yes, for horizontal polarization at low angles (i.e., near the horizon). No, for vertical polarization at low angles. So-so for any polarization at higher angles. Unless you're using EZNEC-4 (based o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00077.html (10,163 bytes)

123. [Towertalk] W2FMI BALUN TOROID QUESTION (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:53:27 -0500
I counted the turns and measured my Amidon W2FMI 1:1 balun, then matched it against Fair-Rite's spec sheets. Most likely your 4:1 balun uses two toroids of the same type as the one in my 1:1 balun. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00178.html (7,059 bytes)

124. [Towertalk] Re: Rohn in Trouble (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:23:37 -0500
Even less than I can imagine using any of their other [expletive deleted]. -Chuck W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00205.html (7,664 bytes)

125. [Towertalk] MFJ [was Re: Rohn in Trouble] (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 17:28:21 -0500
In my mercifully limited experience with buying their products and then trying to get what they'd advertised and I'd paid for, I've never been entirely successful. -Chuck W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00206.html (7,886 bytes)

126. [Towertalk] MFJ [was Re: Rohn in Trouble] (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 18:01:41 -0500
Which reminds me about the guy who jumped from the 102nd floor of the Empire State Building. As he passed the 50th floor a woman called out to him, "How's it going?" He replied "So far, so good."
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00209.html (7,146 bytes)

127. [Towertalk] Vertical Dipole for 40/80/160 (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 12:23:32 -0500
Not at all. You need a balun at the feedpoint; you should route the coax horizontally away from the antenna as far as you can; and even with these two measures you should put a couple of good ferrite
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00348.html (10,050 bytes)

128. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:41:58 -0500
Yes. I've been getting duplicate messages from Towertalk for many weeks, or months. Sometimes the second message arrives on the heels of the first; and sometimes it comes days later, as you've experi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00513.html (8,270 bytes)

129. [Towertalk] Double posts... (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 21:46:14 -0500
Awww. :-( Thinking of HAL and Col. Kurtz was so comforting. Why'd you have to pop my balloon? You're not going to tell us next that there's no Santa Claus -- I hope. I have my heart set on a new towe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00514.html (7,946 bytes)

130. [Towertalk] Quads Yagis and contact static (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 12:21:56 -0500
An obvious _possibility_ is that all parts of all elements of a quad are grounded for DC, whereas one-half of the driven element of a Yagi (the half connected to the center conductor of a coaxial fee
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00535.html (8,021 bytes)

131. [Towertalk] tower joint Conductivity ??? (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 14:21:54 -0500
I've never heard of it, but I wonder about a so far unmentioned consequence of bad joint conduction in a tower: the so-called rusty-bolt effect. Within a couple of miles of my house (which is near th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00548.html (11,082 bytes)

132. [Towertalk] Quads Yagis and contact static (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 15:03:24 -0500
Yes -- IF the explanation that I suggested as a _possibility_ is, in fact, the (chief) explanation. However, I think that the suggestion of Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com> regarding the vertically po
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00556.html (8,569 bytes)

133. [Towertalk] quad (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 16:41:06 -0500
The elevation angle, with respect to the horizon, of the direction of maximum radiation depends much more on the antenna's height above ground than on the antenna itself, for an antenna of this size
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00566.html (6,820 bytes)

134. [Towertalk] Power ground rod driver (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 10:32:24 -0500
Here in northern New England the ground is full of rocks. I've had _great_ difficulty driving ground rods. I need to drive more of them. What should I do? An impact device _much_ more potent than a m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00772.html (9,545 bytes)

135. [Towertalk] Power ground rod driver summary, and a question (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 12:51:40 -0500
I've been asked to summarize the replies I've received, which seems like a particularly good thing to do when most replies have been off-list. I received suggestions to rent an air compressor and "a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00781.html (7,935 bytes)

136. [Towertalk] Burying ground rods horizontally (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 20:38:42 -0500
Related to the recent thread on ground rod drivers is the question of what to do when you _can't_ drive them because you have rock near the surface. The following answers are from Reginald (Reggie) D
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00787.html (10,635 bytes)

137. [Towertalk] pulleys ??? (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 11:18:37 -0400
For my 3/8-in. Dacron rope halyards I use marine/sailboat pulleys. They're all stainless steel, with ball bearings. Mine have been up for a few years; they still work fine and have never fouled. Get
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00024.html (7,633 bytes)

138. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2002 13:36:48 -0400
Thanks to all the Towertalkers, including K7LXC , N4KG, N6IN/2, K1MK, N8KU, W5FL, AD3F, AA1K, K8LX, W4EF, and W9RMA, who so generously shared their knowledge of this topic with me, off-list as well a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00031.html (8,158 bytes)

139. [Towertalk] Tensile strength - Cu wire (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 14:49:07 -0400
This doesn't answer your question, but I hope it's helpful and/or will provoke others to comment helpfully: 1. In an antenna, stranded wire lasts longer than solid wire of the same gauge. Solid tend
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00098.html (7,915 bytes)

140. [Towertalk] Tensile strength - Cu wire (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 18:11:17 -0400
I should have said explicitly that stranded *copper* wire lasts longer than solid *copper* wire of the same gauge. Copper work-hardens to the point of getting brittle and finally cracking due to fati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00102.html (7,848 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu