Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ccc@space.mit.edu: 187 ]

Total 187 documents matching your query.

161. [Towertalk] Moving To New QTH (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 08:58:36 -0400
Interesting question, and I look forward to reading the other responses. I expect that the answer depends strongly on whether your hamming is on HF or on VHF. I live about 1 km away from the site of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00583.html (9,172 bytes)

162. [Towertalk] Multiband Vertical Antenna (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:06:24 -0400
It's most important to provide a good, virtually solid, ground plane -- not only as a counterpoise for your antenna but also to shield/isolate your antenna from the AC power and all the other wiring
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00647.html (10,987 bytes)

163. [Towertalk] 40m ant (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 01:19:30 -0400
Yes, two thoughts: 1. You're trolling, trying to incite a riot. 2. Choose the dipole at 100 feet. 73 de Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00652.html (6,891 bytes)

164. [Towertalk] 20 Meter J Antenna and Noise (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:50:51 -0400
1. First, install a good L-C line filter such as Corcom's two-stage filter, in the TV set's line cord. It'll block both common- and difference-mode RFI. If you can't wait to find one at a hamfest, or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00676.html (7,974 bytes)

165. [Towertalk] 20 Meter J Antenna and Noise (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 11:32:54 -0400
Yes; so have I. And I think that nowadays most TV sets have power-line MOVs. Good catch. -Chuck, W1HIS
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00696.html (7,250 bytes)

166. [Towertalk] Shunt Feed Tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:39:54 -0400
Where I live, you can't get a valid impedance measurement from such an instrument because its detector is broadband and detects too much power from AM broadcast stations. However, an antenna noise br
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00730.html (8,109 bytes)

167. [Towertalk] Good old days(?) (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 10:58:19 -0400
I was active (as W3JVQ) during those fabulous late '50s, especially on 10 m; but my memory has faded and I was not DXing between 1960 and 2000. Therefore I wonder whether other old-timers can confirm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00750.html (7,577 bytes)

168. [Towertalk] Protecting open wire (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:54:27 -0500
I use Press Jones' no. 878 "CQ Lightning Arrestor for balanced line" <http://www.thewireman.com/ground.html> with the spark gaps opened up so they won't break down with high power and the very high V
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00784.html (7,105 bytes)

169. [Towertalk] Counterweights for wire verticals (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 17:01:38 -0500
Not sure I understand your geometry; where does the wire vertical fit into the picture? The first step is to calculate how much tension you want in the wire. IIRC, I found guidelines in the ARRL Ante
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-10/msg00807.html (9,723 bytes)

170. [Towertalk] US Towers (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2002 18:43:43 -0400
The building code in my area (eastern MA) requires 90-mph-wind survival, so I sent email to US Towers (at the address given on their website) asking whether any of their towers can survive 90-mph wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00589.html (8,168 bytes)

171. [Towertalk] TV Cable Information and TVI (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:04:58 -0400
1. It is important to put good common-mode-current RF chokes on both your coax and your rotor cables. First, right at your Yagi feedpoint put an air-wound choke coil in your coax, by winding six turn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00802.html (10,158 bytes)

172. [Towertalk] Co-ax Traps (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:14:25 -0400
I must disagree. It is essential! The trap is a parallel-resonant, nearly lumped, LC circuit. The C stems mainly from the capacitance between the center conductor and the shield/braid of the coax. It
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00804.html (8,779 bytes)

173. [Towertalk] Co-ax Traps (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 13:37:41 -0400
The original question was: "I noticed in the ARRL antenna hand book that the braid is the input and the center conductor is the output. Is this important, and why?" I take "input" and "output" to ref
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00809.html (7,904 bytes)

174. [Towertalk] TV Cable Information and TVI (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2002 20:45:36 -0400
The winding on a toroid should be a single layer, not overlapping, and it should be tight; i.e., the length of cable in the winding should be as short as possible. You want to minimize parasitic capa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00834.html (19,745 bytes)

175. [Towertalk] Wire antennas (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 16:44:08 -0400
A G5RV is a good antenna, if you don't mind using a tuner. A G5RV works well in an inverted-V configuration, supported by a tower. A Carolina Windom could be supported by a tower at one end, but not
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00959.html (8,791 bytes)

176. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:45:32 -0400
According to Rohn's spec sheets, either a 45G guyed tower or an SSV self-supporting tower can support an antenna having 8 sq.ft. of equivalent flat-plate area in 90-mph wind, at the top of a 70-ft. t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00969.html (8,100 bytes)

177. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:06:17 -0400
That's exactly what I'll do if it's not going to waste those folks' time. All I asked for here was an _estimate_. I expected that among Towertalk subscribers there'd be folks who could give me estima
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00973.html (8,610 bytes)

178. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:15:59 -0400
I'd already done that. The difference in steel cost is not significant. The _erection_ of a 70-ft. SSV tower is what worries me. I know that a guyed system is cheaper, but by how much? $3k, $30k, or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00974.html (8,949 bytes)

179. [Towertalk] 45G (guyed) vs. SSV (self-supp'g) 70-ft. tower (score: 1)
Author: ccc@space.mit.edu (Chuck Counselman)
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 18:50:48 -0400
Indeed, Rohn's documentation for the 45G and 90 mph (Dwg. no. C870478 R1) shows the upper guys for a 70-ft. tower attached at 61 ft. The antenna area spec's given in this dwg are 9.1 sq.ft. for an eq
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-09/msg00979.html (8,655 bytes)

180. [TowerTalk] Reference plane for FCC power limit (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Counselman <ccc@space.mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 13:05:56 -0400
At 7:28 AM -0700 9/3/03, Jim Lux wrote: ...I think the FCC is a bit vague on where the reference plane for the power limit is.... The FCC is (also) silent regarding _what_ power is limited. The "forw
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00055.html (10,360 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu