Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:coneal@ma.ultranet.com: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] M2 10-30LP8 log periodic Yagi (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 10:41:02 -0500
Absolutely not true!!! If you take the aluminum required for monobanders, 3 or 4 or 5 elements each, for three bands 10, 15, and 20M, and make one log out of it, you get the WARC bands, all of every
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00390.html (10,617 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] LPDA stacking distance? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 10:42:38 -0500
Hi, I have and the stacking distance depends upon the characteristis of the LPDA. High taper factor (above .92 or so) and high spacing factor (above 0.05 or so) require larger spacing due to the high
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00435.html (8,111 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] LPDA stacking distance? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 20:53:33 -0500
Hi Jim, That stacking method has been used for VHF antennas and only works in the "free space" that VHF and UHF antennas see many wavelengths above ground. At HF, the ground reflection is important a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00468.html (9,817 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Super high antennas on 10 to 20 (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:13:19 -0500
In getting back to the basics, I submit that at heights over 4 to 6 wavelengths above ground, the antenna is in "free space" and that's why the "nulls"are filled in. Also, at these heights, in free s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00052.html (8,752 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Open question... (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:00:21 -0500
Was this by any chance in an April issue?? :>) This "deep thread" about modeling ant has been a great help in showing me just how much about "tech details" I still have to learn - thanks to all. My q
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00127.html (9,647 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Clarification Re: Painting a Roof Tower and Antenna? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:33:43 -0500
Just wondering...were you able to measure performance before and after painting? --Original Message-- From: Stuart Browne [SMTP:satcom@lava.net] Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 6:34 PM To: wd3q@erols
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-02/msg00135.html (13,476 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] FS: Prosistel PST-71B Rotator (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 11:29:19 -0500
I bought this for a crank up tower but it will not fit! This is the biggest of the amateur rotators. You can see the specs at: http://www.prosistel.net/home-e/default_net.html Look at the menu on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00036.html (7,224 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] 75M Rotatable Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 21:01:24 -0400
" The discomfort I have with that idea is I just spent a couple of paychecks on Phillystran, and I hate to think I'd negate all that expensive electrical isolation by hanging a bunch of wires from th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00336.html (9,598 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Weatherproofing for copper coils? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 17:08:03 -0400
I can't answer this question, but it brings up a question I had about upgrading two of these antennas myself. I am contemplating doing the same since they have become intermittent. My question is wil
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00745.html (10,146 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Weatherproofing for copper coils? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 18:38:48 -0400
Reinventing is what it's about! That old design was produced to be cheap, that's why you had to rebuild yours. I'm sure the electrical design is not optimized either. My question is simply to those f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00750.html (12,450 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Weatherproofing for copper coils? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 19:29:33 -0400
A little additional clarification. I haven't modeled this yet but are the inductors deliberately lower Q, read "higher loss" to add some "R" to perhaps 1) improve SWR bandwidth and F/B and/or 2) brin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-08/msg00755.html (14,304 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] 80m Yagis -- Too Tough to Tame? (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2001 15:53:40 -0400
Not really. I bought a KLM 80M-3, a 3 E 75M yagi in 1984 and had it up 9 years. I modified it by adding Phillystran to side guy the elements and the boom. I did not change any of the materials suppli
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00390.html (9,918 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Awesome HF Array Spotted (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 01:43:52 -0400
Hi Jay! I like that system! I have constructed and have had up since 1992 a pair of stacked logs that cover 13.5 to 30 MHz, at 55 and 110 ft. Each log is 18 E on a 62' boom, top rotated with a large
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00646.html (12,430 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Pier pin vs. burying in concrete (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 19:22:08 -0400
Thank you folks! Interesting comments. A good summary of concerns regarding my original question can be found at: http://www.qth.com/ka9fox/pier_pin_vs_embedded_base.txt This was referred to me by an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00000.html (9,464 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Pier pin vs. burying in concrete (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 21:24:36 -0400
Hi folks, I've seen quite a few installations being planned here starting out with the botton section of tower sunk in concrete. What I'm curious about is why a pier pin isn't used? On all my towers
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00635.html (8,717 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] tset (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:49:52 -0500
thanks! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/towertalk Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towertalk@contesting.com
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00434.html (6,341 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Tic Ring problem (score: 1)
Author: coneal@ma.ultranet.com (Chuck O'Neal)
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:18:38 -0500
I had the same "harmonic" noise with my TIC ring rotors, including BC station harmonics that came and went while the ring is turned. In my case the source was the contact between the drive gear and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-01/msg00622.html (8,777 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu