Mail Archive Search: <+from:corneliuspaul@gmx.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:corneliuspaul@gmx.net: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] Re: gain specifications (was CobWebb antennas) (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:41:32 +0200; Very well said Mike, unfortunately it is a true work of art in confusing customers and claiming gain that is simply not there .. while at the same time keeping a door open to always withdraw from fal; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-09/msg00515.html (11,338 bytes)
42. Re: [TowerTalk] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 14:17:26 +0200; At 03:12 13.10.2004, you wrote: On the other hand, if the load is not matched to the transmission line, which happens in the real world a lot, a transmission line that is a multiple of 1/2 wavelength; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00287.html (10,645 bytes)
43. Re: [TowerTalk] coax 'sweet lenght' (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 16:45:49 +0200; At 16:25 13.10.2004, you wrote: shouldn't that be 4 * 1/2 wavelength on 15m ??? yes of course :-) SRI 73 Con DF4SA _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00296.html (9,662 bytes)
44. Re: [TowerTalk] #14 wire (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 19:52:34 +0200; Just do a Google search on "AWG mm" and youre all set 73 Con DF4SA At 19:30 21.10.2004, you wrote: Right, as I recall from being at A61AJ and we had to go out and buy wire for Beverage antennas, in t; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00554.html (8,159 bytes)
45. [TowerTalk] Re: [CQ-Contest] Antenna question (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:55:14 +0200; At 01:08 27.10.2004, you wrote: Since I can't seem to speak to anyone at Force 12 maybe someone on the reflector can help. Is it possible to use a C19XR as a mono-band beam for either 10, 15, or 20 b; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00720.html (8,009 bytes)
46. Re: [TowerTalk] Spider beam.. (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 23:07:58 +0100; OK .. if youre afraid the notes on www.spiderbeam.net are edited, you might want to ask our open user list at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/spiderbeam/ 73 Con DF4SA At 17:34 12.11.2004, Richard M. Gi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00634.html (8,817 bytes)
47. Re: [TowerTalk] adjusting insulated wire dipole (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 13:25:57 +0100; At 13:08 01.12.2004, dennis o'connor wrote: That is the way I have always done it, and everyone I know does it that way... Yes, there will be a small increase in capacitive loading, but you won't not; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00001.html (7,584 bytes)
48. [TowerTalk] RE: Sigma 40XK vs. Minibeam (score: 1): Author: corneliuspaul@gmx.net; Date: Fri, 03 Dec 2004 16:19:13 +0100; I am not surprised with the comparison below. I dont believe that Mini beam will have much more than 2dBd gain on 20m, regardless of what the advertisment says. Also 25 ft above ground is not much on; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00038.html (10,752 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 48
Page: [1] [2] [3]