Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:cq.n6fd@gmail.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: Erich <cq.n6fd@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 19:06:55 -0700
Perhaps a better way to visualize it is that an antenna is a transformer between your radio and free space. That transformer circuit includes both the antenna and the ground surrounding it. Dirt is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00202.html (10,971 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Much Smaller Antennas Possible? (score: 1)
Author: Erich <cq.n6fd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:52:50 -0700
My first thought on this is "there is no free lunch". I have not yet read the paper, and do not understand what they call "symmetry breaking". However, there are two things that limit the performance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00163.html (10,091 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Much Smaller Antennas Possible? (score: 1)
Author: Erich <cq.n6fd@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 19:36:15 -0700
My first thought on this is "there is no free lunch". I have not yet read the paper, and do not understand what they call "symmetry breaking". However, there are two things that limit the performance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00165.html (10,022 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Much Smaller Antennas Possible? (score: 1)
Author: Erich <cq.n6fd@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 15:49:20 -0700
My first thought on this is "there is no free lunch". I have not yet read the paper, and do not understand what they call "symmetry breaking". However, there are two things that limit the performance
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00430.html (10,415 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu