Mail Archive Search: <+from:dann4gnr@hartcom.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dann4gnr@hartcom.net: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. trouble on towers (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Sat, 08 Feb 1997 18:06:19 -0500; IN THE PAST 2-3 DAYS, A PARACHUTIST CLIMBED WHAT WAS APPARENTLY A SEVERAL HUNDRED FT. TOWER IN SOUTH CAROLINA , CLOSE TO ME, AND WENT UP ABOUT 1/2 OF THE TOWER AND JUMPED. HE OPENED HIS CHUTE, AND GO; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-02/msg00159.html (7,343 bytes)
2. Tower refinishing (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Mon, 09 Dec 1996 18:36:51 -0500; WANT TO DO THE VERY BEST POSSIBLE??? TAKE THAT TOWER TO A GALVANIZING "PLANT",AND THEY WILL STRIP THE TOWER TO THE RAW METAL, AND WILL THEN GALVANIZE IT BACK TO NEW-LOOK, AND ALONG WITH THAT YOU GET; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00130.html (9,741 bytes)
3. Homebrew tower (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Tue, 17 Dec 1996 20:00:40 -0500; I HAVE SOME INFO ON WHERE YOU CAN GET 2-1100 FEET OF TOWER THAT FAR SURPASSES WHAT YOU WANT TO BUILD. I AGREE WITH ONE GUY WHO SAID, DONE THAT, BEEN THERE,, IT EASIER AND SMARTER TO BUY TOWER MADE TO; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00293.html (8,225 bytes)
4. rohn 80 tower availability (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 11:46:47 -0500; I HAVE HAD NUMEROUS REPLIES TO THE SUGGESTION TO NQ4I, TO WHERE I HAD GOTTEN SOME ROHN 80 SERIES TOWER A FEW YEARS AGO. THE SOURCE, NORM, K3LYW, HAS NO 80 SERIES TOWER AT ALL, UNFORTUNATELY. SO TO AL; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00312.html (6,782 bytes)
5. Rohn 45g (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Tue, 24 Dec 1996 12:14:45 -0500; YOU WILL FIND ROHN45 VERY HARD TO FIND ON A USED BASIS, ANY ONE THAT HAS IT, KNOWS WHAT THEY HAVE AND WON'T PART WITH IT. YOU MIGHT BE LOOKING AT BREAKING DOWN AND BUYING IT NEW,(and then you will kn; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-12/msg00424.html (7,806 bytes)
6. Non-Rohn Tower (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Thu, 03 Oct 1996 14:37:33 -0400; YOUR TOWER IS A ROHN PRODUCT, IT WAS MADE EXCLUSIVELY FOR MOTOROLA, AND CALLED "H.W. TOWER". SOME PEOPLE DUBBED IT ROHN 35, FOR IT WASN'T 25, NOR WAS IT 45, BUT ROHN TOWER CO OFFICIALLY CALLS IT "H.W; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00046.html (9,843 bytes)
7. Da Birds (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Tue, 08 Oct 1996 08:16:16 -0400; ARMED GUARD WITH LOTS OF #8 SHOTGUN SHELLS, YOU MAY TRY GETTING YOU A GOOD SIZE DOG AND PUTTING HIS HOUSE RIGHT UNDER THE TOWER, OTHERWISE, NOT MUCH YOU CAN DO.....DAN -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.conte; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00102.html (8,708 bytes)
8. Sideguying booms (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Fri, 06 Sep 1996 07:52:55 -0400; how strong even the thin wall is. i have a 72 ft. boom, and I use 2" pvc thats less than 1/4" thick good luck DAN N4GNR; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00066.html (7,398 bytes)
9. Lifting a lot of weight? (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 11:42:35 -0400; WELL,HERE WE GO, ME PUTTING MY 2 CENTS WORTH IN. THE REAL SERIOUS DX'ers HAVE A SAYING, "IF IT STAYS UP, ITS NOT BIG ENOUGH". I CONCUR WITH THAT STATEMENT. THE 48 FT. BOOM WAS NO PROBLEM FOR ME TO GE; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00120.html (12,778 bytes)
10. Lifting a lot of weight? (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Sun, 15 Sep 1996 12:37:10 -0400; -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: K7LXC@contesting.com Sponsored by; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00121.html (13,566 bytes)
11. Tower guying questions (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 17:44:28 -0400; ALAN, FIRST I AM NOT GOOD WITH THIS COMPUTER, I AM NOT SURE I AM REPLYING CORRECTLY. FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND YOU SAYING, I CAN SEE ONE MAJOR MISTAKE YOU MADE. THE ANCHORS YOU USED ARE MADE TO SCREW IN; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00168.html (20,879 bytes)
12. submerged guy anchors (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 18:06:22 -0400; PETE, IF PUT IN AT FACTORY SPECS,YOUR ANCHOR WILL NOT COME UP, EVEN IF WATER STAYS ON IT FOR NOW ON. THAT CHUNK OF CONCRETE WITH A LITTLE OVERKILL, WEIGHS A BUNCH. BUT THATS NOT WHERE THE ANCHOR GETS; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00169.html (8,177 bytes)
13. Tower Communications (score: 1): Author: dann4gnr@hartcom.net (Dan Cisson); Date: Tue, 24 Sep 1996 16:36:26 -0400; RICHARD, THEY WORK FINE FOR ME, I HAVE USED THEM IN THE PAST, WHEN I GET OVER 200 FEET,ANY THING LESS, WE SPEAK UP, UNLESS IN A VERY CROWDED NOISY AREA. THEY DO NOT WORK WELL IN A STRONG RF FIELD, AM; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-09/msg00197.html (8,889 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]