Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dezrat@copper.net: 327 ]

Total 327 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Mast for rotator at bottom of tower? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 08:54:43 -0700
I'm thinking of moving my rotator to the bottom of my 80-foot Trylon freestanding tower. I have read the archives about doing so, but am still not clear on what is a suitable mast. I could use some a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00205.html (7,574 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Permanent fall arrest line? (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:42:52 -0700
I'd like to install a permanent fall arrest line from top to bottom of my tower that I could clip onto using a "rope grab" type of device. I think the rock climbers call them "ascenders". My question
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00308.html (6,770 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Pinning Coax (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 06:58:52 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Running raw 220 volts could land you in jail on an attempted murder charge. Better to get an electric fence charger at any farm supply. I use one to keep my do
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00347.html (7,388 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 07:11:12 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** I've never understood the fascination with verticals for the low bands. If you put up a dipole or inverted vee, you get 100% efficiency, lower receive noise, u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00348.html (9,192 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 09:35:24 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** It's true I am not a serious DX chaser on those bands, but if I were I would certainly not stop with a single vertical. Four-squares and beverages are what the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00390.html (9,960 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:08:30 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** So you are saying that a dipole at less than 1/4 wavelength high has *only* straight up radiation? You might want to rethink that one. 73, Bill W6WRT _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00391.html (9,686 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] Was Radials... 160m High angle vs. low angle (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2006 10:14:50 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** About a decade ago, there was a DXpedition to one of the antarctic countries where they were on a glacier several hundred feet deep. Since ice frozen hard is a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00392.html (8,377 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted Vee (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 08:58:16 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Apex is at 70 feet, ends about 20 feet, and it is full size - no traps or loading coils. The blessings of a 2.5 acre homestead. :-) Bill, W6WRT _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00402.html (7,075 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M Inverted Vee (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:38:07 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** If you include the extra man-made noise the vertical picks up, that sounds about right. :-) Seriously though, such statements are of no value unless you includ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00409.html (7,925 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:42:59 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** Yes you did. Here is your original quote. Read it again: "They have to be at least 1/4 wave above ground before the radiation pattern is anything but straight
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00410.html (9,512 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] re Radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 06:58:40 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** W7EL, author of EZNEC, hangs out on the rec.radio.amateur.antenna group on Usenet and is quite active. Bill, W6WRT ____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00430.html (9,863 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] Shock-absorbing lanyard arrived (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 07:06:19 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** May I ask what the term "rebar" means in regards to lanyards? I have seen the term a few times but have not found a definition. Bill, W6WRT ___________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00431.html (7,612 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks - and follow up Q's. (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:05:39 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: ** REPLY SEPARATOR ** The horizontal part also helps make it more broadband in terms of SWR. A 30 or 35 foot vertical, whether center or base loaded is going to be very narrow. A mo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00547.html (7,677 bytes)

14. Re: [TowerTalk] Bonding Tower Sections (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 07:27:10 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- I'd recommend not running RF through the tower. Use the tower to support a wire and apply the RF to that. Even when initially bonded correctly, discontinuities
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-06/msg00621.html (8,174 bytes)

15. Re: [TowerTalk] taunting guide wires (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 09:46:36 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Naw, a "rig" is what they drill for oil with... or is it what politicians do to elections... or is it a cowbpy's outfit... or is it an eighteen-wheeler... or .
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00035.html (6,886 bytes)

16. Re: [TowerTalk] staples for radials (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 08:27:15 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- Great idea, thanks! Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00163.html (7,665 bytes)

17. Re: [TowerTalk] staples for radials - non metal (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jul 2006 10:38:14 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- If: 1. Your house is made of wood and 2. You have fireplace logs sitting around outdoors and 3. You live in a termite area then 4. A bunch of three inch dowels
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00171.html (8,089 bytes)

18. Re: [TowerTalk] Generator Multi Fuel Conversions/Consumption (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2006 18:30:52 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- The above sentence is nonsense because you are confusing power (watts) with energy (watt-hours). Horsepower can be converted to the equivalent value of watts,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00292.html (7,958 bytes)

19. Re: [TowerTalk] CATV & Phone grounds (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:13:49 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- That raises an interesting question. As I understand it, lightning really does flow in one direction, making it DC but having a square-wave nature. Is that whe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00346.html (9,520 bytes)

20. Re: [TowerTalk] CATV & Phone grounds (score: 1)
Author: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2006 12:41:30 -0700
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: -- REPLY SEPARATOR -- As I understand it, plasma (in the general sense) can exist with or without current flow. In the absence of external heat, plasma will quickly recombine into n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00348.html (9,838 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu