- 1. [TowerTalk] phased dipole matching (score: 1)
- Author: dpease@adams.net (Danny Pease)
- Date: Tue Feb 25 21:36:02 2003
- Is anyone using phased dipoles? I seemed to remember a local ham using a pair of phased sloping dipoles on 75 meters (endfire) and I would like to try them myself. It seems to me he fed the array dir
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-02/msg00478.html (6,627 bytes)
- 2. [TowerTalk] high power 300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
- Author: dpease@adams.net
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 16:10:48 GMT
- Anyone know of a source for high power 300 ohm twinlead? If not how about any comments on using 450 ladder line in place of 300 ohm for phased sloping dipoles? Danny NG9R NG9R@arrl.net ..............
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00268.html (7,561 bytes)
- 3. [TowerTalk] RE:300 ohm twinlead (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:32:03 -0500
- Thanks for all the replies about the 300 ohm twinlead. I have some on order now. Danny NG9R _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers"
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00305.html (6,540 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Re: beams too close? (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 21:51:55 -0600
- Will they interact? Probably. Will they still work? Absolutely!! Go for it and if it really creates more of a problem than you are willing to live with, you can always change it later. NG9R at but ab
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00242.html (17,086 bytes)
- 5. [TowerTalk] Rohn J tower? (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:02:25 -0000
- Anyone have any experience with or heard of Rohn J tower? Like Rohn 45G but bolt together. Anyone know of spec's, is it sturdier than 45? Danny NG9R _______________________________________________ Se
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-07/msg00873.html (7,117 bytes)
- 6. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 41, Issue 67 (score: 1)
- Author: dpease@adams.net
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 14:23:20 -0500
- Dave, I have had some experience with POR-15 but as a base/sealer for rusted sheet metal in automotive use. How well does POR-15 stand up to weather and UV? I had never given a thought to using it o
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00480.html (8,589 bytes)
- 7. [TowerTalk] 1 dB difference (score: 1)
- Author: dpease@adams.net
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 13:21:23 -0500
- snip I can say from experience, on VHF and above 1 dB is HUGE! IT has made all the difference in a solid Q5 copy or just a weak signal in the noise. I agree, in HF use, 1 dB is usually unnoticeable.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-05/msg00405.html (7,257 bytes)
- 8. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 8 (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2007 06:59:58 -0500
- K4VX had the elements of his homebrew 40 meter beam destroyed by wind a few years back and he bought the new elements from M2. I don't know what he had to pay for them but it wasn't pocket change. He
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00053.html (7,486 bytes)
- 9. [TowerTalk] Gin poles (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 08:31:57 -0500
- I have used homemade gin poles for more years than I can remember and the last one might have cost $50.00 for material. It is a very simple design and it can be moved and relocated in a matter of min
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2008-10/msg00028.html (8,026 bytes)
- 10. Re: [TowerTalk] Stacking VHF antennas (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 12:09:38 -0600
- I agree with Larry, the Directive Systems link has some great information on spacing of yagi antennas to keep the interaction down. Scroll down about a fourth of the page and there is a great illustr
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-02/msg00543.html (7,512 bytes)
- 11. [TowerTalk] JB Weld and RF (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 06:39:44 -0500
- I also have used JB Weld in fairly high RF environment with good results. I have repaired hundreds of double sided 100 watt VHF PA boards where the solder joint between the transistor and the copper
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00411.html (7,151 bytes)
- 12. [TowerTalk] guying a self supporting tower (was guy line anchor ?) (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 16:55:45 -0500
- There's no place to do this with a tubular tower, as shown in the photograph...and there's no way to mount a rotator inside the tower, either. Unless I've looked at completely the wrong photograph, t
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00325.html (7,428 bytes)
- 13. Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 81, Issue 24 (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 22:08:42 -0500
- Message: 6 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:30:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Anderson <andersonww5l@sbcglobal.net> Subject: [TowerTalk] OT Hamstick mobile antenna To: towertalk@contesting.com, felipe@dxwatch.com
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-09/msg00162.html (7,356 bytes)
- 14. Re: [TowerTalk] Burying Hardline (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 06:48:50 -0600
- Message: 1 Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:34:20 -0700 From: "Ray" <rayn6vr@cableone.net> Subject: [TowerTalk] Burying hardline question To: <towertalk@contesting.com> Message-ID: <03F5FCBE96D34FD5A423591DA
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00174.html (7,678 bytes)
- 15. [TowerTalk] modifying R7 (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:08:09 -0600
- Has anyone modified the R7 to remove the lower capacitance hat? I would like to do this to improve efficiency and bandwidth on 40 meters, although it should improve performance on all bands. My thoug
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2009-11/msg00416.html (7,371 bytes)
- 16. [TowerTalk] coax loss (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:21:28 -0600
- For all you that feel 3 dB loss isn't worth worrying about, keep thinking along that line. It makes it a bit easier for me to break some of the pileups. :-) I enjoy VHF and UHF weak signal work and m
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00315.html (9,011 bytes)
- 17. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor loops (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 10:22:09 -0600
- I didn't think it was done any other way :-) I do a full loop plus even with 213 and up a couple of turns for Superflex. I have to laugh every time someone says you can't run Heliax around a rotating
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-02/msg00655.html (8,140 bytes)
- 18. [TowerTalk] gided tower (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:31:19 -0500
- I guess a "gided" tower is one that uses "gide wires", not guy wires. NG9R _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list Tower
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00411.html (6,506 bytes)
- 19. Re: [TowerTalk] connector losses (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2010 11:53:33 -0500
- I have to agree, a connector that has any measurable loss will get warm. I was told by one of our RF engineers many years ago that at UHF and 900 MHz we should expect as much as .1 dB loss for each c
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00031.html (10,163 bytes)
- 20. [TowerTalk] tuners and power rating (score: 1)
- Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>
- Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 14:26:48 -0600
- I have noticed several so called legal limit tuners that cannot handle even medium power on 160 unless the load is very close to 50 ohms already. Also, note almost all tuners ratings are amplifier in
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00464.html (7,051 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu