Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dxdx@optonline.net: 160 ]

Total 160 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Rubber boots SteppIR (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2005 12:20:26 -0400
All: What's the best way to keep the rubber connector/boots on the SteppIR antenna from weathering? 73 Tony KT2Q _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Se
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-10/msg00734.html (6,553 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] Crank-up cable replacement? (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 13:10:08 -0500
All: Friend of mine needs to replace the cable on his US.Tower crank-up. Was wondering if it's best to use the manufacturers replacement cable or go aftermarket? Thanks, Tony - KT2Q _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-11/msg00296.html (7,073 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] Items for Sale (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:33:36 -0500
For Sale: Various crank-up towers (some motorized) ranging from 40 to 100+ feet. Skyneedles, Lattice towers, tubes, rotors and other miscellaneous items. For details call -- 631 462 7510 or 631 462 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-02/msg00377.html (6,755 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] Kenwood Spike? FL7000 amplifier (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 03:50:36 -0400
All: My Yaesu FL7000 amplifier has a hyper-sensitive protection circuit (well known problem) that trips easily with my Kenwood rig in SSB mode. This doesn't happen in CW. I tried using an Icom and an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-05/msg00101.html (6,978 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Steppir on 6 meters (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 06 Sep 2006 14:53:24 -0400
Mike, I have the 3 element SteppIR with the passive element for 6 meters. The F/B and gain seems to compare well with the like-size monobander I had. There's a limit to how much gain you can get out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-09/msg00260.html (9,245 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] rebar does rust (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 16:35:17 -0400
Richard, I asked about rusting tower bolts a while back and was told that it's not a problem. Guess they were wrong. There is some surface rust on the bolts after 6 years and I'm wondering if it's ne
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00389.html (8,034 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Yaesu FT2000? (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:59:33 -0500
All: Has anyone had the chance to checkout the receiver on the new FT2000? The W8JI close-space receiver tests would seem to indicate good performance. Tony KT2Q _____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-11/msg00502.html (6,513 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] Third Order Intercept (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 20:17:51 -0500
Greetings all: Have a question about third order intercept point. I understand the measurement takes sensitivity into account at the point were IMD products start to show at the noise floor; the grea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00720.html (6,944 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Third Order Intercept (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 14:43:24 -0500
Steve, Your right; realized I was on the wrong reflector after I sent the post. My apologies. Tony KT2Q measurement takes sensitivity into account at the point were IMD products start to show at the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00736.html (8,582 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Third Order Intercept (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:49:34 -0500
Gary, That's exacltly what I was trying to say in my post. You obviously have more knowledge about this subject so thanks for all. I think it's fair to say then that the receivers noise floor and the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00737.html (10,087 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] Wrong reflector - K7LCX (score: 1)
Author: Tony <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 15:53:28 -0500
Steve, Did it again Steve. Senior moment... Tony KT2Q _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00738.html (6,268 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] Tower winch failure (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 11:02:44 -0400
All: Was cranking my US Tower HDX555 up after last nights ice storm when puff, the Fullton 1550 winch broke. I thought there would have been damage to the tower and antennas, but it came down much sl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00285.html (7,010 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower winch failure (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 12:26:39 -0400
Al: Thanks for the reply. I took the liberty of attaching a short video of the winch after it failed; I sent it to your home address. It looks like the spring loaded latch (pawl) broke off completly.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00287.html (7,699 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] Tower winch failure; revised (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 13:33:49 -0400
All: After clearing the ice from the winch, I can now see that the pawl or spring-loaded latch is still there, but it looks like the crank shaft that the sprockets are attached to shifted to one side
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00291.html (6,777 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower winch failure (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:38:30 -0400
Alan: Same here; the clutches come into play when the cable is letting out and they do make noise. There was a totally different noise when the winch failed. It was more like SNAP, SWISH, THUMP ; ).
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00302.html (8,660 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] Tower Damage inspection? (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 00:55:08 -0400
All: I haven't been able to fully inspect the tower as I'd like with all the snow, but it looks ok so far. I don't see any obvious grinding or bending from the winch failure. I'll take a better look
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00326.html (6,954 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] Tower pictures (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:54:48 -0400
All: Received quite a few requests to see the tower after the winch failure, so I posted a few on the web at http://tim-tom1.magix.net/ . To get a closer look, click on Tower Pictures and then the fu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00351.html (7,030 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] Winch Failure -- US Tower Response (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:26:46 -0400
Gents... Thought I'd mention that Bruce, the President of U.S. Tower, contacted me an hour or so after I e-mailed the company about the winch problem on Saturday. Been in touch with them several time
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00364.html (7,072 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] Final words and thanks on winch failure. (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:12:07 -0400
Gents: Re-examined the Fulton K1550 winch today and it seems to function fine. I thought there was enough play on the winch crank shaft (due to a cracked bushing) to slip the sprocket out of alignmen
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00411.html (8,388 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] Important info for K1550 winch (score: 1)
Author: KT2Q <dxdx@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 15:15:56 -0400
All: Just read the manual for the K1550 winch and noticed an important note that some of us might not be aware of: "DO NOT REMOVE OR ADJUST THE DOUBLE LOCKNUTS ON THE LONG END OF THE INPUT SHAFT. THE
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-03/msg00430.html (6,990 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu