Mail Archive Search: <+from:eisinger@velocitus.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:eisinger@velocitus.net: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] KLM 10 - 30 7LPA info (score: 1): Author: eisinger@velocitus.net (Bill Eisinger); Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 11:56:07 -0700; I have had an M2 7 & 10-30 LPA up for about 2 years now. It is essentially the same antenna with the longest element also acting as a 40m linear loaded dipole. I have mine mounted at 70' and it is a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-12/msg00731.html (8,370 bytes)
2. [Towertalk] Log Periodics (score: 1): Author: eisinger@velocitus.net (Bill Eisinger); Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:06:08 -0600; I went through a fairly extensive review of the various options available and settled on the M2 7&10-30 mHz "skip log". The M2 is by the far the most ruggedly built of the bunch and, with the longer; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00044.html (8,864 bytes)
3. [Towertalk] M2 10-30LP8 log periodic Yagi (score: 1): Author: eisinger@velocitus.net (Bill Eisinger); Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 07:23:03 -0700; I have the M2 7&10-30 "Skip Log" which is the same antenna with a 40m element added. I have it at 70' and been extremely pleased with its performance. As John says, it isn't the same as a large mono-; /archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00385.html (10,112 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Source for J-bolts (score: 1): Author: eisinger@velocitus.net (Eisinger); Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 15:10:01 -0600; I put a new tower up about a year ago and found a local steel fabricator for anchor bolts. Look in the Yellow Pages under "steel fabricators or fabrication" and you shoud find several choices. The pl; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00317.html (8,873 bytes)
5. Re: [TowerTalk] 7-10-30LP8 (score: 1): Author: "William Eisinger" <eisinger@velocitus.net>; Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 22:16:25 -0600; I've had one for about 4 years now at 75' . I have absolutely no complaints. As Mike mentioned, it has an excellent SWR profile. It is a very well built an absolutely bullet-proof antenna. M2's servi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00211.html (10,260 bytes)
6. Re: [TowerTalk] Heavy Tower Delivery (score: 1): Author: "Bill Eisinger" <eisinger@velocitus.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 22:52:59 -0600; I rented a fork lift from a local rental company. Worked great by simply sticking one fork into the end of the tower and lifting it off. Bill, AA7X Im interested in buying a US Tower or Tasijan tower; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-09/msg00898.html (8,778 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antennas (score: 1): Author: "Bill Eisinger" <eisinger@velocitus.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:22:45 -0700; Hi Dave I have the M2 "Skip Log" and have really come to like it. As an LP, it is obviously a compromise antenna when compared to other frequency-specific large arrays. However, if you consider the f; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00342.html (10,472 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] M2 "Skip Log" vs. SteppIR (score: 1): Author: "Bill Eisinger" <eisinger@velocitus.net>; Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 08:41:27 -0700; Again, one of the reasons I went with the M2 was because of the 40m coverage. If I were doing it today, I would most likely throw the Steppir Monster antenna into the mix for evaluation. It is was mo; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00359.html (9,252 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]