Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ersmar@comcast.net: 445 ]

Total 445 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] Concrete "Slump" (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net (ersmar@comcast.net)
Date: Thu May 29 13:01:34 2003
Jerry: Three-thousand pound concrete is the compressive strength of the mix, in this case 3000 pounds per square inch of surface. Check out http://www.umeciv.maine.edu/cie111/concrete/strength.htm fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-05/msg00379.html (10,291 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld, Ultraweld, etc (score: 1)
Author: "EUGENE SMAR" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:21:22 -0400
Tom et al: I did the same thing with duct seal on my Cadweld one-shot molds. Apparently the ground rod was smaller diameter than half inch nominal and I blew the first charge. I cut off the top of th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00634.html (12,296 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Cadweld, Ultraweld, etc (score: 1)
Author: "EUGENE SMAR" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:42:52 -0400
Gil: Duct seal is that gray or black putty-like material that electricians use to close the ends of wall penetrations (where your electrical service enters your house, for example), or to seal the to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00637.html (16,510 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] How do you cut this stuff? (score: 1)
Author: "EUGENE SMAR" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2003 21:20:40 -0400
Wes: I've read on these pages before to wrap electrical tape on either side of the cut mark on the wire before you actually cut. This will keep the cut ends from fraying/unraveling. FWIW. 73 de Gene
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00077.html (9,190 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Running coax into the basement (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 22:05:50 +0000
Dan: At a minimum, be sure you include a drip loop on any coax entering from above through the PVC cap. A better choice (IMHO) is to install a 90-degree elbow, facing downward, on the outside, then s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00204.html (8,882 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 22:04:33 -0400
TT: I agree with Phil and Tony regarding the use of exothermic welding over clamping for underground ground (?) connections. They are maintenance-free as compared to mechanical clamps that ought to b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00500.html (10,781 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Tower on Trailer (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 16:43:40 -0500
Folks: Found this on E-bay this afternoon: http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3056870941&ssPageName=MERC_VI . FWIW. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F ______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00287.html (6,998 bytes)

28. Re: [Towertalk] Connecting grounds to towers (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 20:47:50 -0500
TT: You can get Cadweld One-Shots also from RF Connections in MD (www.therfc.com ). My two cents. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F non-oxidizing compound between your ground clamp and the ground rod. This is ava
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00417.html (18,985 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Horizontal + Vertical Polarization Question (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2003 14:13:41 -0500
TT: I have seen similar performace differences on Topband between my shunt-fed tower with seven radials and my erstwhile 160M inverted L with a half-mile of radials (!) and the vertical element 45 fe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00559.html (11,441 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:19:43 +0000
Jerry: Forget about loading that last leg of your L. Just string up the required 133 feet and let the last leg bend however necessary to get it into the space available. I did that with a 3/8 WL L a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00014.html (9,640 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] 160M inverted L (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 21:11:16 +0000
Alan: An easier solution might be to install three sloper wires, one for each band. The issue then would be where to tap the tower for optimum performance (insert your own definition of optimum here)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00048.html (13,882 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor replacement (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 00:06:37 -0500
Barry: Before you loosen the rotator u-bolts, consider adding a clamp above the top bearing. I wouldn't rely on the two set secrews in the TB-3 to support the vertical load of the mast and antennas w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00073.html (13,148 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 12, Issue 9 (score: 1)
Author: ersmar@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2003 21:21:30 +0000
Robin: Thanks for the info. The McMaster P/N I would need (9961K44) would cost me about $13, whereas the muffler clamps actually cost about $4 for a set. However, I'm sure the industrial version woul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00098.html (9,869 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete Question... (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 19:55:17 -0500
Ted: I'd suggest talking with your concrete supplier. It's their business to know when you can or cannot pour. 73 de Gene Smar AD3F Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00124.html (8,729 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] ARRL Web pages (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 11:51:36 -0500
TT: FYI. I found this on the ARRL's web pages today: http://www.arrl.org/news/features/2003/12/05/1/?nc=1 . It includes a link to N1LO's summary of construction practices - the book many of us have h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00154.html (6,851 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] HELP!!!!!!!!!!! (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 23:02:11 -0500
TT: To help a bit in properly selecting a tower for your anticipated loads, Trylon have made available an on-line calculator at: http://www.trylon.com/lightdutytowers/towercalc.asp . Utilizing this s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00159.html (8,460 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] "Swallow-tail" fall arrest lanyards (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 22:39:23 -0500
Pete: Try Buckingham: http://www.buckinghammfg.com/ . They make industrial-quality equipment for linemen and arborists. N3RR and I have bought equipment from them. You might also try Klein Tools at h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00327.html (9,607 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Bulkhead Source (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:15:07 -0500
Warren: I'm sure others on the list will provide their suggestions for the ground panel. Allow me to make additional suggestions for you to consider. The contractor ought to be able to install your g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00404.html (10,650 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 20:37:15 -0500
Tom: Electrically it doesn't make a difference whether the wire's insulated or not. Mechanically, the insulation gives you a significant degree of protection against corrosion and eventual disappeara
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00695.html (8,885 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground radials (score: 1)
Author: "Gene Smar" <ersmar@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:56:13 -0500
Jim: 73 de Gene Smar AD3F off I never thought about it, and I haven't observed any degradation in performance of the solid vs stranded wires in my radial field. (not that I'd be able to tell anyway.)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00700.html (11,297 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu