Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:forrestw@gbis.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [TowerTalk] Slow Attenuation of Incoming Signal (score: 1)
Author: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 07:01:40 -0700
I've had the same symptoms. It was a dirty connection on a switch in the antenna tuner. Good luck. Forrest K7OCR --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00565.html (9,059 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Test (score: 1)
Author: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 08:53:40 -0800
Right here ... waiting for some more bird-talk. Forrest K7OCR Where is everyone.... just a test _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00473.html (8,778 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] elevated radials vertical (score: 1)
Author: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jun 2007 09:38:21 -0700
Mike, I'll toss in what I've found on my vertical. I'm using a Butternut HF9V-X. Butternut has a schematic for a multi-band ground radial on their site that is made out of 300 ohm TV ribbon lead. Fra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-06/msg00139.html (11,069 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] How tall is that tower? (score: 1)
Author: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 06:48:16 -0700
Bout 30 or 40 miles NE of Las Vegas on I-15, off to the south of the hwy there is a giant tower. It's mounted up off the valley floor on a ridge. It's far enough away that you can barely make out the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00034.html (6,877 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Combined Dipoles (score: 1)
Author: Forrest Wolf <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:48:03 -0700
I'm using a tri-band V, that has two Vs. One is cut for 80 & the other is 20/40. It's coming down, all the parts are here :-), in favor of this one: http://www.cebik.com/gup/gup5.html This is working
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-04/msg00400.html (10,576 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft 6 meter beam ID ? (score: 1)
Author: Forrest Wolf <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 13:10:20 -0700
No, I think Alex was thinking about Obama. 73's _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00359.html (8,046 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV vs Vertical for DXing (score: 1)
Author: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 19:13:06 -0700
I had a Butternut 9V, not quite that high, with 8 sloping radials @ 45 degrees on 20m & 8 on 17m. It still didn't work as well as the V @ 35'. I did a lot of switching back & forth too. I had it up f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-05/msg00424.html (7,714 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] Gizmotchy's (score: 1)
Author: Forrest Wolf <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2009 09:42:53 -0700
I operated one of these & learned polarization shift on DX signals. While on "horizontal" polarization, you'd see a dip in signal strength. If you switched to "vertical" polarization at the null, the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00264.html (11,531 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] 135' open wire fed dipole pattern (score: 1)
Author: "Forrest Wolf" <forrestw@gbis.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 07:22:44 -0700
Cebik has a great writeup. //cebik.com Click on Tales and Technicals Near the bottom of the page, click on Antennas From the Ground Up Happy reading, 73 de W7SG --Original Message-- From: towertalk-b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00208.html (8,694 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu