Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:fvobbe@wlio.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Tower Leg Maintenance (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 16:39:53 -0500
I think most of us with older towers have, at one time or another, painted or at least removed rust starting on the outside leg of a tower, and repainted it. Has anyone done anything to the inside of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00155.html (8,083 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leg Maintenance (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 07:42:40 -0500
The reason this sort of intrigues me is because in 1983 I had to drop a rather new 410' tower in an AM array due to rusting from the inside out. The forensics of the aftermath showed that apparently
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00178.html (8,541 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Cost effectivel Tower height (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:22:54 -0500
I notice there are several versions of the book. Is the program available in all versions? For example, the "ARRL Antenna Book 22nd Ed Softcover [Paperback]" doesn't say if you get a data CD with the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00386.html (8,812 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 08:10:15 -0500
You know, there is another component to this discussion. Let's suppose you have .1 to .5dB loss in an RF system. During transmission or reception, will that really mean anything? I'm not sure I would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00278.html (10,011 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 11:14:18 -0500
With all due respect, Dan, in design you have to weigh all losses, and one way is not to over-complicate designs with multiple connectors. However, on my station I come out of the rig, to a low-pass
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00289.html (11,201 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:48:31 -0500
Never even considered running anything greater than 500 watts through a PL259, to be honest with you. I know they are rated for higher power, but I've never considered them as being the right connect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00297.html (10,047 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss? (score: 1)
Author: Frederick Vobbe <fvobbe@wlio.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:17:17 -0500
I appreciate your opinion, but try not to justify your position by adding in Type-N and BNC into this discussion, I never spoke about them. All I'm saying is the PL259 is a poor connector to use in h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-01/msg00332.html (10,457 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu