Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:garyschafer@comcast.net: 443 ]

Total 443 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] Wet setting conduit? (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 02 Apr 2005 16:06:52 -0500
If you look at the lightning suppressers as a device to equalize the potential between the shield and center conductor of the coax then maybe it will be easier. Also look at the ground connection on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00060.html (22,286 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 15:47:27 -0400
I haven't tried it on 80 but I don't see why it wouldn't work there too. I did do that on 10 meters. Mounted a vertical element on the 3 element beams boom. Phased them with proper length lines. I tr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00102.html (9,358 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] simultaneous Horizontal and Vertical antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:37:58 -0400
How do FM stations manage to transmit dual polarity? What do you think I was seeing when I phased vertical and horizontal antennas together on 10 meters? I found that with severe rapid fading on eith
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00127.html (11,596 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 12:40:02 -0400
Insertion loss? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00128.html (9,889 bytes)

105. Re: [TowerTalk] simultaneous Horizontal and Vertical antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 14:24:35 -0400
Hi Jim, The antenna I used was a ta33 and I mounted a vertical dipole out on the end of the boom near the director. I realize it was kind of a crude way of doing it as the beam had more gain than the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00139.html (16,960 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] simultaneous Horizontal and Vertical antennas (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:15:36 -0400
Thanks for the comments Jim Lux. How would you account for the disappearance of the signal when switching between right hand and left hand polarization if it were not circular polarization propagatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00146.html (11,764 bytes)

107. Re: [TowerTalk] Mounting 10m/15m/20m monobanders -- single mast. (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2005 11:39:50 -0400
I have always been curious why someone would invert the stack. It seems that the mechanical disadvantage of the larger antenna on top of the mast would be more of a problem than any advantage. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00170.html (12,124 bytes)

108. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding of guy wires... (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2005 21:26:09 -0400
Use galvanized ground rods. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Cal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00341.html (9,539 bytes)

109. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor disassembly (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2005 11:26:19 -0400
What does "quenching with paraffin" do for the bolt? 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00533.html (12,348 bytes)

110. [TowerTalk] Reseting remote computer (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 10:45:16 -0400
For those that run remote sites, how do you reboot the computer at the remote site if it hangs up? Thanks Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00675.html (6,784 bytes)

111. Re: [TowerTalk] Reseting remote computer (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 12:50:38 -0400
Sorry if this seems out of place. I am planing on a remote site several States away from home. Site will include towers, antennas etc. Since several on here have similar sites they operate it seems t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00687.html (7,967 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] Bird loading and elements (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 20:16:42 -0400
Are those Bird loads calculated in watts? :>) 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00112.html (11,528 bytes)

113. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground strap to water pipe? (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 08 May 2005 22:51:34 -0400
Your steel pipe is probably galvanized? If so you do not want the copper in direct contact with it. Place a sheet of thin stainless between the pipe and the copper strap. Put a stainless hose clamp a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00184.html (9,970 bytes)

114. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground strap to water pipe (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:09:44 -0400
You don't want a zinc clamp. It will be fine with the water pipe but not with the copper wire / strap. Bronze clamps (not brass) are ok with both galvanized and copper. But you still do not want the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00227.html (12,955 bytes)

115. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR is what SWR meter measures (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:50:53 -0400
Oh oh, now you started it Gene. :>) I will give the first answer. No measurable difference at the other end. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00292.html (9,260 bytes)

116. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR is what SWR meter measures (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 22:15:13 -0400
I agree with Tom about reflected power not being dissipated in the transmitters final. For all practical purposes, it all gets returned to the antenna and radiated except for the small amount of loss
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00305.html (16,391 bytes)

117. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR is what SWR meter measures (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 10:59:10 -0400
Here is another way to look at it: With a circulator at the transmitter output and a load on the return port of the circulator, disconnect the antenna line from the circulator. Now all the power out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00329.html (12,956 bytes)

118. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR is what SWR meter measures (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:05:50 -0400
But where does that "lost power" go? :>) 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00331.html (10,102 bytes)

119. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR is what SWR meter measures (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 11:08:59 -0400
There will be the same degree of mismatch at the antenna that caused the reflection as there is at the transmitter. 73 Gary K4FMX _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscom
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00332.html (10,880 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] SWR is what SWR meter measures (score: 1)
Author: Gary Schafer <garyschafer@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 12:58:44 -0400
end of a HF wireless signal transmitted with an antenna measured that has a 2:1 (impedance either high or low) SWR versus an antenna that has a measured SWR of 1:1.2 or so - given you are working wit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00337.html (10,010 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu