Mail Archive Search: <+from:gmyers@CetLink.Net>

Results:

References: [ +from:gmyers@CetLink.Net: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Power Line Noise? (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Wed, 24 Nov 1999 20:23:35 -0500; Gentleman, I have just placed an offer on a parcel of land... 2 A ready for some towers. I have one concern that I hope some of you can put to rest. There is a high tension line that is 500' west of; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00481.html (7,533 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] re:cushcraft X-7 (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 19:02:44 -0500; Glenn I believe the 40 add on kit is the X940. Also I was told by CC that they were going to start to ship the X9's right about now and the 40's would follow by a couple weeks. Also very interested i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-02/msg00309.html (7,235 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] Stacked tri-banders vs. Single mono-banders (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 20:27:23 -0500; A 2-stack of 3 element monos (20 meters) with 50 foot spacing I respectfully submit the evidence suggests otherwise! Most modern longer boom tribanders are pretty efficient compared to a 3 el yagi. I; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-01/msg00378.html (9,964 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] EZNEC (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sat, 06 Dec 1997 15:53:55 -0500; Maybe someone can tell me what I am doing wrong on this thing? I modeled a dipole for 20 at 30'. This gives me 6.8dbi at 34 degrees if memory serves me. This is 1/2 wave height which I would have tho; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00149.html (7,750 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] EZNEC (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sat, 06 Dec 1997 18:51:16 -0500; No I am comparing apples to apples. The plots can be overlayed and I can easily see the dipole is several DB stronger at its peak and near the verticals peak. It is something more than just this. G.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00152.html (7,782 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] EZNEC (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 09:38:13 -0500; I am aware of issues related to verticals and dipoles - what to expect and not expect. I expect and saw the dipole at ~1/2W had a lobe at 34 degrees, this looks right. Its elevation beamwidth is 41.5; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00160.html (9,034 bytes)
7. [TowerTalk] 80M lazy sloper (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 17:35:24 -0500; I modeled something similar - I have four vees as you describe but I first moved them 10' away from the tower (obviously top and bottom). THen I modeled using 4 sources (i.e. the eqv of phasing I bel; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00167.html (8,176 bytes)
8. [TowerTalk] EZNEC (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sun, 07 Dec 1997 18:23:41 -0500; Thanks to you and all for the responses. I see that indeed it is what it is! I am surprised to see the differences though. A 4 Sq array seems to be tremendously louder for DX than a lowly dipole at 1; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00169.html (8,380 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] Ham Mail Fraud (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Fri, 12 Dec 1997 18:54:23 -0500; Here! Here! I agree! -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-towerta; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00310.html (8,392 bytes)
10. [TowerTalk] X9 (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sat, 13 Dec 1997 16:38:12 -0500; Anyone have this antenna yet? It was suppose to be at the dealers by the end of OCTOBER! How about the X7 - anyone have it up? How is the construction? Does the VSWR do what they claim? G. -- FAQ on; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-12/msg00329.html (6,545 bytes)
11. [TowerTalk] SAn Jose Land (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Sun, 09 Nov 1997 10:07:37 -0500; Any help? I am comtemplating a move to San Jose California from SC but I do not want to give up ham radio due to restrictions and/or cost of land for towers. Anyone familiar with the area tell me if; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00182.html (6,846 bytes)
12. [TowerTalk] painted towers (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 18:39:12 -0500; I believe the paint spacing is 50' not 10'. G. -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative requests: towertalk-REQUEST@contesting.c; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00365.html (7,591 bytes)
13. [TowerTalk] X9 (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Wed, 19 Nov 1997 19:14:18 -0500; Anyone have the X9 yet? To the "experts" on stacking tribanders : Is there a problem/concern with stacking a X9 over an X7? An equivalent might be to stack a TH7 over a TH6? This would allow a X9 to; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-11/msg00538.html (7,139 bytes)
14. [TowerTalk] Grounding Question (score: 1): Author: gmyers@cetlink.net (Gary Myers); Date: Fri, 31 Oct 1997 19:09:58 -0500; It Interesting! I had heard a report of a report of a .... so indeed maybe this is correct (doesn't blow up)! THought at one time years ago Rohn had this in their catalog but maybe not. As regards a; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00000.html (8,354 bytes)
15. [TowerTalk] X9 Stack (score: 1): Author: "gmyers@cetlink.net@gmyers"@CetLink.Net (Gary Myers); Date: Thu, 16 Oct 1997 21:19:30 -0400; I am interested in doing a four stack of the new X9 Cushcraft. I hope to stack them at 35, 72, 109, 146. I would do a three stack (no 140') but the thought of a 2EL40 add on option for the 146' and 7; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-10/msg00444.html (7,075 bytes)
16. [TowerTalk] X8 or is it X9! (score: 1): Author: gmyers@CetLink.Net (Gary Myers); Date: Wed, 03 Sep 1997 20:11:49 -0400; Looks very interesting! It can be seen at Cushcrafts site. When someone models it please let us know. I am thinking about fashioning my return to radio (been in astronomy) with three of these babies!; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00104.html (6,827 bytes)
17. [TowerTalk] TIC Ring intermittents (score: 1): Author: gmyers@CetLink.Net (Gary Myers); Date: Thu, 25 Sep 1997 18:42:09 -0400; JOhn, I cannot help you but maybe you can help me. I as not aware that TIC was still in business. Are they and do you (anyone else) have a phone number and/or web site? Any comments on quality? tnxs,; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00672.html (8,314 bytes)
18. [TowerTalk] New 1000MP (score: 1): Author: gmyers@CetLink.Net (Gary Myers); Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 10:23:54 -0400; I have been out of radio for several years (been enjoying astronomy with a 30" telescope!). Lots of changes since I was gone. I have just ordered a 1000MP and wonder if someone can direct me to the "; /archives//html/Towertalk/1997-09/msg00732.html (6,932 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]