Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jamesnf@aol.com: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground planewire. Insulated or uninsulated? (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:09:44 EST
Insulated or not makes no practical difference. The ground rods might be useful for lightning protection but will make little difference for RF. Refer to the 2004 NCJ article by K3LC for guidance on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00674.html (8,052 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt feeding the tower on 80m and radials (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 11:13:51 EST
Mike: One of the biggest misconceptions going around today is that ground level radials should be a 1/4 wave long. See the K3LC article in the April/May 2004 NCJ. There are many sources of informatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00675.html (7,535 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] Shunt feeding the tower on 80m and radials (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:53:05 EST
For a given quantity of wire being available for radials, say 1,000 ft as in the example, making the radials one quarter wavelength long may not result in the most efficient radial system. 73 Jim ___
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00689.html (7,677 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] re; Whiskers growing where you cannot shave them (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sat, 2 Apr 2005 11:33:17 EST
Not so Tom. Although much progress has been made with "no-clean" solders, dendrite growth is still an issue when pc board assemblies are exposed to humidity. To remove flux residues after waveline or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00040.html (7,823 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] re; Whiskers growing where you cannot shave them (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 11:08:18 EDT
I'm no chemist, that's for sure. I was working as a manufacturing manager in a high volume electronics assembly plant at the time. But I will say all our efforts were directed at removing flux residu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00086.html (9,747 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] 2 antennas (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2005 14:59:15 EDT
In a message dated 4/3/2005 1:21:16 PM Central Standard Time, wy3d@usa.com writes: I had a guy tell me last night that he runs a vertical and a dipole on 80 meters in parallel so he'll get simultaneo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00100.html (8,204 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] simultaneous Horizontal and Vertical antennas (score: 1)
Author: jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:43:34 -0400
Nope, no jumping to conclusions here. And tnx for the info that so many of the guys are running stacked yagi's on 80 now. Wow....... Things keep changing faster than a fella can keep up with them. --
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00118.html (10,326 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] HBX tower rotational loading (score: 1)
Author: jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 13:53:23 -0400
Guess I was lucky..........Had a HDBX48SAB (screw anchor base - no concrete) holding up a Hygain 204BA for a number of years with no issues. It was a neat tower. Because the sections nested, I was ab
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00429.html (9,622 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna feed line (kind of on topic) (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 06:54:15 EDT
I agree that the 75 ohm kw balanced line is impossible to find. I've looked and looked with no results. However, you can go ahead and use 300 ohm, 450 ohm or 600 ohm balanced line and have negligible
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00731.html (7,486 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Mosley TA34XL (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 23:19:14 EDT
I've used a couple of the smaller Mosley tribanders over the years and they worked fine with the insulated, split dipole driven element fed directly with coax. Jim W9TM ______________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00788.html (6,965 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Grading a ground radial system (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 11:29:20 EDT
Hi Paul: Your measured impedence drops with the radials detached because there is less loss in the system. With an extensive radial system, your impedence should drop to the vicinity of 32 ohms with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00364.html (7,926 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Grading a ground radial system- correction (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sat, 14 May 2005 11:34:27 EDT
Sorry 'bout that! Jim W9TM _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00365.html (6,992 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] Monoband Verticals (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 22:53:20 EDT
Jim W9TM _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1-800-333-9041 with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00418.html (7,272 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Tennadyne's T3.20M - 8.5 dBd on 18' boom (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 10:23:32 EDT
In a message dated 5/23/2005 8:34:35 AM Central Standard Time, btippett@alum.mit.edu writes: Gotham Vertical copywriters are alive and well and now living at Tennadyne. ;-) I'm not sure why Gotham an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00583.html (7,661 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Gotham advertisement (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 22:01:08 EDT
What CQ magazine article? Where? Jim W9TM _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Cal
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00597.html (6,525 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluma Crank Up Towers (score: 1)
Author: Jamesnf@aol.com
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:01:34 EDT
Ray: I haven't owned an Aluma tower, but I did look at the print of their free standing base. It looks amazingly like the EZWay tower free standing base I had back in the early 70's. I had EZWay's 50
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-05/msg00724.html (7,859 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu