Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jim@luxfamily.com: 378 ]

Total 378 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [TowerTalk] Feedline (choke) question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:46:44 -0400
  I'd bet that in most cases, the outside of the shield (if not buried) is a lower impedance (unless it's just the right length) than anything in the soil, though. "This one bothers me. Remember that
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-09/msg00114.html (10,812 bytes)

362. Feedline (choke) question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 15:56:46 -0400
  Well, some of it does reradiate from subsurface (hence sounders and other "radars"). And in things like a Beverage, the currents in the dielectric under the wire form an essential part of the anten
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-09/msg00115.html (17,684 bytes)

363. Re: [TowerTalk] Feedline (choke) question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 10:12:08 -0400
  <big snip> The late Henry Ott taught in his EMC workshops that above a few kHz, the impedance of a conductor with even a very large cross sectional area is dominate by inductance. yes - the inducta
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-09/msg00121.html (11,571 bytes)

364. Re: [TowerTalk] Feedline (choke) question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 14:28:38 -0400
The Starlink emissions are regular old spurious EMI from digital circuitry. Odd as it may seem, spacecraft have no requirements for unintended emissions.  That is, there's no Part 15 or CISPR type ru
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00028.html (15,820 bytes)

365. Re: [TowerTalk] Feedline (choke) question (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2025 11:36:44 -0400
Youre talking about the round DIN connectors here (like used for MIDI), versus the RF DIN connectors? Yes, DIN and mini-DIN are way too delicate for stage use.. you want something you can step on or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00034.html (13,413 bytes)

366. Re: [TowerTalk] Do you have copper? (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 13:27:34 -0400
  yeah, these guys are actually stealing wire out of live streetlight circuits.  And of course, they don't realize that optical cables have no copper, so there have been cases of them cutting phone c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00050.html (8,870 bytes)

367. Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:07:17 -0400
  As noted in another email, radials buried, on, or near the ground are likely not identical, (different soil properties if nothing else, but also other stuff near by, unless youre out in flat farmla
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00065.html (11,311 bytes)

368. Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:35:26 -0400
  Have to issue a correction here. The ground system is part of the antenna. It has to be connected to the unbalanced feedline at the feed point in order for return current to travel on the inside sh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00074.html (9,587 bytes)

369. Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:54:31 -0400
At some point, isn't that basically making a Beverage? "Anyway, in some cases they ran stupid long radials but in very limited directions (like a gob of them over just 5 degrees then 10 degrees etc e
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00076.html (10,008 bytes)

370. Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 14:57:53 -0400
  If it's a perfect conducting screen and of infinite extent... It doesn't matter.  If it's a grid of some sort - then it's sort of "soil with increased conductivity" from a "interacting with the fie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-10/msg00077.html (9,948 bytes)

371. Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 10:54:15 -0500
  True, but I wonder how long the vinyl will last - there will inevitably be pinholes in the coating.  Granted, *any conductor* in the soil will improve the performance, even if half rusted away. All
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00012.html (14,027 bytes)

372. Re: [TowerTalk] Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 18:40:32 -0500
20-25% is actually what Fair-rite gives as a tolerance for their cores (at least for the EMI suppression family) - Chip beads are 25% So if you've measured 20% variation, that's probably within spec.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00014.html (9,329 bytes)

373. [TowerTalk] ferrites Re: Raised Radial Spacing (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 21:19:25 -0500
  yeah - the book by Snelling discusses all the variables. The Fair-rite catalog also goes into the mfr process. There's a reminder at the bottom of most of the pages that says "if you need better, c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00018.html (10,289 bytes)

374. Re: [TowerTalk] N6LF Website (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2025 12:36:11 -0500
Probably because it is http:// not https:// Bitdefender warns me that Rudy's website is suspicious and blocked access to it :( 73 Mirko, S57AD V V pet., 14. nov. 2025 ob 20:23 je oseba Phil G via Tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00066.html (10,203 bytes)

375. [TowerTalk] Fan dipole Re: Looking for a HP 80/40 Duplexer (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 12:44:38 -0500
  most fan dipoles (e.g. DX-CC from alpha delta, if you want a commercial unit) use the same element for 40 and 80 with a sort of trap. And if you did have a 40/80 fan dipole, the two elements would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00080.html (11,635 bytes)

376. Re: [TowerTalk] Fan dipole Re: Looking for a HP 80/40 Duplexer (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 15:46:42 -0500
"sort of trap" - I wasn't sure, because modeling it as a straight inductor didn't seem to produce feedpoint Z that matched the measured values.  So I just assumed it's sort of a L with parallel C, bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00083.html (11,908 bytes)

377. Re: [TowerTalk] Fan dipole Re: Looking for a HP 80/40 Duplexer (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2025 19:52:19 -0500
  Sure, that probably reduces the C by a factor of 2, so coupling is 6 dB worse. Still not particularly well isolated. 16 MHz seems about what it would be for L and parasitic C - It's been a long tim
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00090.html (10,643 bytes)

378. Re: [TowerTalk] Fan dipole Re: Looking for a HP 80/40 Duplexer (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Lux" <jim@luxfamily.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 15:00:41 -0500
The DX-CC is exactly what you describe - three wires connected to a single feed point, spaced about 6-8" apart. An element for 10, 20, and 40 (15 is third harmonic) and 80 with loading coils on the 4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2025-11/msg00093.html (9,909 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu