Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jlangdon@outer.net: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Rohn QA problems (was -- Are These Parts OK for a Rohn 45Tower?) (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 11:16:31 -0600
I am told that this problem is worse on 45G than on the 25 or 55. When Rohn moved production on 45 from one plant to another they not only lost some experienced people but they lost an EPA "grandfath
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00154.html (8,197 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Stack 10m yagi w/ C-3E? (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 1999 05:33:18 -0600
Two things that immediately come to mind are the matching methods used, i.e., does it differ from one antenna to another and introduce a different phase shift; and distance that the driven element is
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00046.html (9,003 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Re: [losses] (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 1999 17:02:35 -0600
If you test the internal automatic antenna tuners in many new transceivers you will find, even on a relatively small mismatch, that you can get 100W to the load with no tuner and only 80 or so with t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00337.html (11,685 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] ZR3 vs. Attic Dipole (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 14:29:35 -0600
Counterpoints if you please. I have tried every kind of attic antenna there is: dipoles, folded dipoles, G5RV, 8JK's, J-poles, Isotrons, aluminum tape on the windows, ad infinitum, and at one locatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00532.html (10,591 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] RE: LPDA versus thread (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 7 Oct 1999 08:40:43 -0500
Most of these posts tell us more about ourselves than about the antennas. We all are potential suckers for a "seductive simplification". We want to sort things out and not have to keep analyzing them
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00160.html (9,270 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Elementary question about Skip (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 11:34:10 -0500
Possible explanations: 1) These guys aren't hearing them either - they are re-posting stuff they see on eHam or DX Summit. 2) They have much, much better antennas and/or locations than you do. I reme
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00371.html (9,765 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Force 12 C-3 Problems (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 09:00:59 -0500
FYI the higher wind rating versions, with larger, stiffer tubing, are less prone to this. 73 John N5CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.co
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00555.html (8,600 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Tower permits and seals (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 06:52:17 -0500
Sometimes 10 feet can make a difference. My property lies across two counties. County one: Requires full "limited development permit" complete with wet sealed engineering drawings and information she
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00597.html (9,175 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Crankup Aluminum Tower (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 07:20:43 -0500
I doubt you would have much success devising some kind of "brush assembly" to ground those top sections. I would ground the coax shield to the tower at the top and bottom and use the Polyphasers as y
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00627.html (10,870 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Exothermic Welding? (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 09:03:01 -0500
Doc it works great but it is expensive compared to clamps. You have to get the surfaces really clean and follow instructions carefully - but if you do the results are very good. I went with the compr
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00680.html (9,839 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Stacking Force 12 C3's (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 1999 21:26:52 -0500
Best thing to do is model over your terrain. My experience is that best triband compromise spacing between 27 and 30 feet. Final spacing usually dictated by mechanical issues. With more than 30' spac
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00736.html (8,586 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] 40m beams (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 1999 14:55:21 -0500
75' is a little low for optimum performance for 40M DX, but it will sure beat the heck out a sloper. I would look at the new force 12 40M elements that are 85% of full length. I do know if they have
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00815.html (8,872 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] guying question (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 1999 19:50:41 -0500
My test was "well out of reach of a teenager standing on top of his pickup". I decided on this test after my neighbor reported seeing a truckload of teenagers hop over the fence at my remote site one
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00603.html (8,351 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] LMR400 rotor loop (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 1999 10:54:38 -0500
The LMR400 will not hold up well in that application. Since the loop is short and a small fraction of the overall attenuation along the feed line, I use a mechanically strong coax that can hold up. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00617.html (8,229 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] best antennas at low height above ground (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 05:13:46 -0500
The city is not "required to okay any height you need", and if you take that attitude with them you may be tied up in red tape for a while. But, in Texas they are required to "reasonably accommodate"
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00644.html (9,202 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Ground Rods - Steel or Copper Clad Steel? (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 1999 14:00:29 -0500
It depends on the soil. In alkaline soils, copper clad is fine. In acidic soils, especially when wet most of the time, steel and copper clad may not last, and some people have recommended galvanized
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00659.html (8,679 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] BuryFlex or LMR-400 (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 22:20:39 -0400
I have some of both but would use BuryFlex throughout next time. 73 John N5CQ I want a low-loss coax to pull into my buried conduit and am looking at the Davis BuryFlex vs. LMR-400. Apparently the Bu
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00010.html (7,905 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] RE: Tower Grounding Query! (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 06:08:57 -0500
The spacing between the towers is an important parameter and I could not tell from your post how far apart they will be. I use a rule of thumb that if the towers are more than 80' apart, they are ess
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00208.html (10,602 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] RE: Tower Grounding Query! (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 10:38:56 -0500
I don't think tying anything together that is more than 80' apart does anything, because I believe the energy from the stroke will go somewhere else quickly, rather than patiently traveling out the e
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00212.html (9,486 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Loops vs dipoles (score: 1)
Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon)
Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 19:43:21 -0500
Many years ago I had a 2 el quad and a TA33 tri bander at the same QTH. Quad was much quieter during rain showers, and a little bit quieter the rest of the time. Quad also required lots of repairs, a
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-08/msg00219.html (7,740 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu