Mail Archive Search: <+from:jlangdon@outer.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:jlangdon@outer.net: 97 ]

Total 97 documents matching your query.

41. [TowerTalk] Elevation of Guy Anchor Points? (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:23:42 -0600; Visualize the tower installed on a perfectly flat surface at the same level with your actual tower base is and per manufacturer specifications. Keep the guy wires just as they would be on that flat s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00161.html (9,583 bytes)
42. [TowerTalk] ant restrictions (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 10:23:18 -0600; (1) read the "Ham Law" reflector: ham-law@altlaw.com (2) get a copy of the "Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions" that applies to the property you are looking at. The best way to do; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00399.html (9,239 bytes)
43. [TowerTalk] C4XL vs. TH-6 (Wilson SYS-36) (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Tue, 23 Mar 1999 19:14:53 -0600; There is an upcoming C51XR with a 40M section, but I know no details beyond that. I have not heard of anyone loading the C31XL boom. The C4XL has a broader front end (more cardiod like) than the Wils; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00475.html (8,753 bytes)
44. [TowerTalk] Guying Designs (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 29 Mar 1999 16:09:25 -0600; Keep the angles the same as if the tower was installed on perfectly flat ground. This is also true if you are using elevated guy posts. If you change the angles, you cannot rely on the manufacturer s; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00531.html (9,230 bytes)
45. [TowerTalk] Buried Hardline (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 16:00:41 -0600; Or you can use solid if you "crown it" so the center is higher than the ends and the condensate has a place to go. This is not always practical. 73 John N5CQ In this part of the world we have a probl; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-03/msg00572.html (8,094 bytes)
46. [TowerTalk] 2nd OP-Belly up? (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 18:36:06 -0600; I still have a W9IOP second op. Runs fine, no support required, but tough to update the prefix table! 73 John N5CQ Hi all, John's towel has been thrown in; support for 2d Op is gone! 73, George T. Da; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00021.html (7,636 bytes)
47. [TowerTalk] temp guys (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 21:45:25 -0600; The other thing the "pros" do is watch the guys both temp as they go up and permanent as they go under the temps and then up to see if the tension is reasonably equal (Loos gauge) and the sections ar; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00058.html (10,417 bytes)
48. [TowerTalk] temp guys (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Thu, 4 Feb 1999 17:05:22 -0600; "Wait a minute. When are you 'moving the temps up'? The sequence for Rohn guyed tower of any caliber is to put up 4 sections, attach the permanent guys, put up 4 more sections, attach guys, repeat as; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00084.html (9,463 bytes)
49. [TowerTalk] Abbreviation (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sat, 6 Feb 1999 05:11:53 -0600; Actually, this is a group of operators who mutually and intensely dislike an old English fellow named Charlie. TFIC & 73 John N5CQ -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissio; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00121.html (7,183 bytes)
50. [TowerTalk] A sense of the group? (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 08:22:36 -0600; I eliminated the LP's early on because I wanted to be competitive in pileups. I know there are lots of anecdotes about how "my LP blew away old Joe's Contester's 4 element mono band yagi", but that i; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-02/msg00300.html (8,061 bytes)
51. [TowerTalk] Tower grounds near Underground Utilities? (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sat, 23 Jan 1999 08:42:41 -0600; Conventional wisdom (ala Polyphaser) is that two points must be separated by 75' or more to be considered really separate for lightning prevention. As a practical matter, that may be overkill. I am b; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00409.html (10,639 bytes)
52. [TowerTalk] My Dream Station... (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:41:06 -0600; I am sure you will get many of the same and better ideas from others, but see below for my thoughts on your proposed installation. I have just ( I almost said completed, but it is not, and may never; /archives//html/Towertalk/1999-01/msg00498.html (13,769 bytes)
53. [TowerTalk] Control cable Grounding (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Wed, 4 Nov 1998 06:28:01 -0600; Snip SNIP When I installed my tower and grounding system, I bugged two good friends (and PolyPhaser engineers) for help every step of the way. On the subject of the number and position of lightning p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00076.html (8,121 bytes)
54. [TowerTalk] Stacking question (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1998 18:59:32 -0600; I have never seen a compromise spacing that worked across such a wide frequency range. There are pattern problems even going from 10 to 20 meters, much less all the way to 40. As you know, I interlac; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-11/msg00634.html (9,111 bytes)
55. [TowerTalk] "I" beam question (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Tue, 13 Oct 1998 06:42:28 -0500; The answer is: "it all depends". Without actually calculating the tension in the guys and the loads on the anchors, there is no way to specify the materials you will need. The loads are complex. Not; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00333.html (10,366 bytes)
56. [TowerTalk] A Question of GAIN (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sun, 18 Oct 1998 18:15:15 -0500; I make it 4.6 dBd for the first one, +3 dB for the second one, plus 3 dB more for doubling from 2 antennas to 4 => 10.6 dBd This is borne out by my experience with a mixed stack of C3's and C4XL's at; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg00599.html (10,099 bytes)
57. [TowerTalk] force 12 stacks (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Sat, 31 Oct 1998 07:12:28 -0600; I have a WARC7 in between a C3 and C4XL stack, with about 15' spacing from it to the other antennas. As I remember, Tom told me to get 10' or more of spacing to avoid problems. I see no interaction.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-10/msg01008.html (7,820 bytes)
58. [TowerTalk] Several questions :-) (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 28 Sep 1998 16:05:36 -0500; I have a mixed pairs C3/C4XL setup at 30 ft spacing. Lower spacing would have been better for 10M, and slightly lower (27 ft) looked best for 15M gain/pattern smoothness when modeling, and one pair (; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-09/msg00726.html (9,000 bytes)
59. [TowerTalk] Towers & Trees (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 13:05:03 -0500; You should consider the trees to have a 100% set back requirement ala some municipalities: if the tree would fall across a guy or anchor during a full length fall in any direction, it should be gone.; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00235.html (9,278 bytes)
60. [TowerTalk] 65G is overkill (score: 1): Author: jlangdon@outer.net (John Langdon); Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 13:22:26 -0500; I would always choose 55 instead of 45, but 65G is a whole 'nother smoke in terms of installation and ancillary hardware. If you ever do the calculations and determine that you really need 65G, you p; /archives//html/Towertalk/1998-08/msg00237.html (7,114 bytes)

Current List: 41 - 60
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]