Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:john@kk9a.com: 2929 ]

Total 2929 documents matching your query.

321. Re: [TowerTalk] "Superloop" & other Field Day antennas (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:59:56 -0400
You could use a DX Blaster cage dipole with a manufacture's claim of 5dbd gain. Their website http://dxblaster.com suggests many operators experience 2"s" units of gain or 12 db. Gang I've googled th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00372.html (8,215 bytes)

322. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole revisited. (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 14:03:21 -0400
But they are comparing it to something buildable on earth by saying "We list it as having a 5dbd (yes thats dbd) gain over a dipole." I think it is fair to assume that the reference dipole has the sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00379.html (9,425 bytes)

323. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole alternatives (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 17:32:21 -0400
The ARRL antenna book shows a 2:1 SWR bandwidth of less than 300 KHz for an 80m cage dipole with a 6 inch spreader diameter. DX Blaster claims 400 KHz bandwidth for their 80m cage dipole. I am not su
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00446.html (10,465 bytes)

324. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole alternatives (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 18:17:06 -0400
W4HV informed me that DX Blaster 80m cage dipole uses 1 meter spreaders. These spreaders are much larger than the cage dipole example in the ARRL Antenna book so the 400 KHz bandwidth claim is very p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00469.html (8,074 bytes)

325. Re: [TowerTalk] Cage dipole gain figures (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:39:52 -0400
If you use a good feedline, there is little loss from higher SWR at the band edges. For example if you use 100 feet of Belden RG-213 at 3.8 Mhz and the antenna has a whopping 4:1 SWR ratio, the addit
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00490.html (7,428 bytes)

326. Re: [TowerTalk] plastic forms (!) for cage dipoles (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:45:32 -0400
I don't recall any previous posts on a multiband parasitic dipoles. I am interested in hearing how this works so please post your results on the list. John KK9A Maybe Don and Dave could carry this co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00510.html (9,862 bytes)

327. [TowerTalk] Antenna quality and support (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 21:19:18 -0400
I'm wondering if you ever went with the 40M4LLDD? I am now considering this antenna and noticed your towertalk post. I emailed M2 earlier today and now wonder if they will respond. John KK9A [TowerTa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00543.html (8,665 bytes)

328. Re: [TowerTalk] K9AY Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:42:37 -0400
Another antenna that should be considered is the pennant. I installed and used a K9AY loop for several contests. Gary is a great guy and he made very nice products. The loop is easily switched and wo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00710.html (7,919 bytes)

329. Re: [TowerTalk] Morse Code on Google (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 17:58:26 -0400
I hope that all of the towertalk hams can decipher it. Google has a morse code message on their site today! 73, Scott W3TX _______________________________________________ ____________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-04/msg00774.html (7,569 bytes)

330. [TowerTalk] 133' Vertical on 160? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 17:31:05 -0400
Yes, make the vertical section as high as possible with in inverted L and a 1/4 wl vertical wire is even better. I had a 160m vertical wire at my last house supported by one of my tower guy wires and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00044.html (7,893 bytes)

331. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotor for Long Cable Run (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2009 20:18:48 -0400
Almost any rotator of sufficient size to turn the antenna with a potentiometer will suit your needs if you use a large enough cable to minimize voltage drop. My last station had cable runs well over
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00228.html (9,211 bytes)

332. Re: [TowerTalk] Got Nuts? (An M8 Square One) (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:14:18 -0400
If you can't find a suitable metric nut at you local hardware store you could use a 5/16-18 bolt maybe with some large washers so you can turn the hex head or if you're really lucky you could find a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00357.html (7,927 bytes)

333. Re: [TowerTalk] Mock disaster video: Los Angles N9FAA Here you go ... (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Mon, 18 May 2009 21:22:54 -0400
What is the relevance to U-Bolts or TOWERTALK. Mock disaster video: Los Angles N9FAA Here you go ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYoIb0wk0zE N9FAA -- On Mon, 5/18/09, N3XX <n3xx@charter.net> wrote
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00358.html (8,873 bytes)

334. [TowerTalk] Another Cage Question (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 17:35:54 -0400
If you are trying to increase the bandwidth , I think that the cage is more effective at the end of the conductor or the horizontal portion of your inverted L. You really don't need a smart tuner for
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-05/msg00521.html (7,192 bytes)

335. Re: [TowerTalk] MOVs in Stackmatch (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 18:37:22 -0400
WX0B relays are pretty tough, I have had many direct lightning strikes and no relay damage - even with no MOV protection near the relay. I have had MOV's short after a direct hit, so sometimes they f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00092.html (8,151 bytes)

336. Re: [TowerTalk] Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 18:12:45 -0400
Instead of relying on the undisturbed earth to hold your tower in position, you are basically relying on a 60,000 pound weight with a 10 foot square footing to hold up a 90 foot tower. Since this is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00139.html (9,857 bytes)

337. Re: [TowerTalk] Engineering advice on above ground foundation (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 21:36:50 -0400
Is the concrete base growing? The original post (shown below) said that the base is 10 x 10 x 5 which is 18 1/2 cu yards of concrete and would weigh considerably less than your estimate. As Jim Lux p
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00161.html (13,475 bytes)

338. Re: [TowerTalk] Rigid Steel Conduit as Mast? (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 2009 21:14:43 -0400
Another option is to purchase an aluminum mast. You should be able to find a local supplier and the mast would not require any corrosion protection like purchasing steel tubing would. It is available
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00191.html (9,164 bytes)

339. Re: [TowerTalk] Yaesu G-2800DXA Not Rotating (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:19:42 -0400
The Yaesu G2800DXA is a nice rotator. Are you sure that nothing is binding and that your coax is free? John KK9A I just turned on my control box last night and tried to work some stations when I noti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00285.html (8,318 bytes)

340. Re: [TowerTalk] Painting Rohn 25 tower (score: 1)
Author: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:26:17 -0400
This is a great product: http://briteproducts.com/ John KK9A I plan to put up a used Rohn 25 tower in the next couple of weeks. Just got the permit today. The tower is in excellent shape, but I plan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-06/msg00286.html (7,945 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu