Mail Archive Search: <+from:johnb3030@comcast.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:johnb3030@comcast.net: 29 ]

Total 29 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] PL-259 question (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 18:50:57 -0600; Amphenol makes several different solder-type PL-259 plugs. http://www.amphenolrf.com/products/CatalogPages/UHF.pdf http://www.amphenolrf.com/search.asp?sid=50A430806CC8617F&N=57+4294966936+4294967230; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00133.html (8,080 bytes)
22. Re: [TowerTalk] PL-259 question (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 14:45:37 -0600; A little more clarification here relative to my inquiry: I am only interested in the differences between the different Amphenol PL-259 plugs. I won't consider using a generic plug from an unknown sup; /archives//html/Towertalk/2012-11/msg00163.html (9,545 bytes)
23. Re: [TowerTalk] 15m monster finally up - EME and Video (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:56:29 -0600; JH1KRC reported hearing his own EME echo on 15M in January 2006 with much less antenna. http://eme.dokidoki.ne.jp/sound/jh1krc/index.html The echo he recorded sounds much weaker than what Tonno was h; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-02/msg00282.html (9,105 bytes)
24. [TowerTalk] Comparing Hi-Z Receive Arrays and KB7GF Shared Apex Loop (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:09:30 -0500; I too am looking for something that will improve my ability to receive weak signals on the low bands. Specifically, something that will help me work my last 4 zones on 80 (22, 23, 24, and 26). Any th; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00302.html (7,797 bytes)
25. [TowerTalk] Analysis of mast slippage in rotor (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 19:00:36 -0500; My mast has slipped about 30 degrees in the rotor after over four years with no slippage. Prior to noticing this I wasn't aware of any recent windy days. Before taking corrective action, I'm thinking; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00018.html (11,865 bytes)
26. Re: [TowerTalk] Analysis of mast slippage in rotor (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 06 Oct 2013 12:14:38 -0500; Thanks to all who responded on this issue. It appears that there is no perfect solution. The weak link for the HAM-III and related rotors is the limited strength of a 1/4-20 U-bolt. I'm reluctant to; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00082.html (10,081 bytes)
27. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 06:18:17 -0600; Tennadyne markets the Slipp-Nott. 73 Dave W1CTN I had one and I had a very bad experience with it. When the mast slips in the rotor but not in the Slipp-Nott sleeve, the resulting forces are transmit; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00359.html (8,469 bytes)
28. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2013 12:06:26 -0600; I see nothing wrong with the slipp-nott design if used with enough rotator. Unfortunately many rotators depend on the mast slipping to protect the rotator. 73, Roger (K8RI) The problem I see with the; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00378.html (8,492 bytes)
29. Re: [TowerTalk] Slipp-Nott (score: 1): Author: John Becker <johnb3030@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 13:28:37 -0600; Dino, Sorry, but I totally disagree. Perhaps we have a misunderstanding of terminology here? Let's take it from the top and go through the entire scenario. The U-bolts are on the top casting of the r; /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-12/msg00405.html (14,949 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 29
Page: [1] [2]