Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jonk@jskent.com: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Hawks (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2001 17:25:00 -0700
I have a 55ft tower in my backyard with a TH7DXX and an M2 40mt dipole. The birds, Redtails and Shrikes included, only occasionally sit on the antennas looking for food. They tend to protect nests, s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-07/msg00621.html (8,506 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Ameritron RCS-4 (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 08:01:20 -0700
I don't think so. I've used my RCS-4 for three years, mostly at legal limit, without any problems at all. They're supposed to be rated to about 3kw, if my memory of the manual is correct. I mounted m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00324.html (9,143 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] big base hole (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:03:35 -0700
My own experience included using a P.E. He'll give you a design that will fit your conditions and it will be correct and maybe even save you money, especially if you already have a geology report. In
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-04/msg00458.html (7,542 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Tower Base Construction (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 06:17:12 -0800
Right! Do you have any bedrock at the site at all? If so, there is another solution which I used for my 55ft US Tower. I had a PE design a round hole, 15ft into bedrock. Since there was 5 ft of compa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00400.html (9,159 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Leaning Tower (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Fri, 03 Dec 1999 22:02:36 -0800
Hi all, Last night we in L.A. had one of our Santa Ana winds. This big blow was clocked (rumour has it) at 76mph. I don't think it was that much because at that speed you can't stand up and I could.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00044.html (7,926 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Leaning Tower (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 1999 21:40:52 -0800
Thanks to all for their timely advice on my Tristao that got tweaked by the wind. FYI, it was unanimous.:The tower must go! Now, the next problem: The insurance wants two estimates on replacement. Fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00109.html (7,314 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] New erection (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Mon, 08 Nov 1999 11:25:58 -0800
All this talk about erections and vibrators certainly made me sit up and take notice! Seriously though, the comment about the vibrators is correct. I was told the same thing when I poured my base ( 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00153.html (9,165 bytes)

8. [Re: [TowerTalk] New erection] (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 1999 04:50:14 -0800
The tower we put up was a Tristao (aka USTower) HBX-555. Because the wind rating here is 96 mph, the PE determined the base had to be at least 10 ft into bedrock. The reason The base was shaped like
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-11/msg00173.html (8,225 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Elementary question about Skip (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 1999 08:33:59 -0700
OK Gang, Here's a question I feel I should know but don't. I just finished installing an expensive tower-antenna combo. It's a M2 40m dipole above a TH7DX on the top of a US Tower HDX555. Now, I'm pl
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00369.html (8,136 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Cleaning a TH7DX trap (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 1999 22:20:33 -0700
Hi gang, I have an antenna party scheduled for the morning to make adjustments to my HF tower and antenna. I was hoping the person who sold me the antenna would provide the answer by today, but I thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-10/msg00465.html (7,548 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] best antennas at low height above ground (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 1999 21:18:38 -0700
I'm puzzled by this statement. You shouldn' t be waiting for the city to give you a suitable height. You should give them the height. According the FCC ruling PRB-1, local authority can not limit the
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-09/msg00641.html (8,277 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Tuning M2's 40m1L 40m antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 1999 20:53:41 -0700
Hi all, I just finished assembling a brand new 40M1L and decided to some priliminary tuning prior to raising it on the tower next weekend. Using an SWR meter(MFJ-259) I tuned it at about 7 ft height.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00050.html (7,105 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 05:51:56 -0700
Sory, forgot to mention that the 40m1L is a rotatable dipole-- no front/back. Jonathan -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Submissions: towertalk@contesting.com Administrative
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00052.html (9,399 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 10:09:40 -0700
Of course, I will call Mike--on Tuesday. In the meantime, I'm trying to troubleshoot this myself (my own brand of Masocism). I've checked all my joints and in retesting the SWR, I'm now seeing the me
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00057.html (9,753 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 11:23:56 -0700
One problem down, one to go. I checked both the linear loading bar (one set screw was loose) and the connection to MFJ-259 (original model I believe)--it was also loose. After tightening them both, t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00058.html (9,126 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 12:09:17 -0700
Pat, I agree that the freq. of the best SWR will change as the antenna is raised. But that shouldn't prevent me from getting a good SWR SOMEWHERE on the spectrum. Right now, the best I'm getting is 3
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00059.html (9,124 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Sun, 4 Jul 1999 14:31:09 -0700
Ok, Guys, we're getting somewhere. I first tried the normal setup (into the 1:1 balun) with a uncoiled length of RG58 (the only cable of any length I could liberate)between the MFJ-259 and the balun.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00061.html (12,647 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 06:42:23 -0700
VERRRY Interesting! I tried your test this AM. I used a dummy load (the MFJ 264) since I didn't have any bare resistors handy. The sweep showed 2.1:1 from 6Mhz to 7.5Mhz and 2.75:1 from 7.5Mhz to 8Mh
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00070.html (16,866 bytes)

19. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 1999 09:22:02 -0700
Thank you all very much for trying to help me this weekend. I think it is now time fore to talk to Mike at M2. I'm sure he'll know exactly what's going on here. I'll report back what I find tomorrow.
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00074.html (8,976 bytes)

20. [TowerTalk] Re: tuning M2's 40m1L antenna (score: 1)
Author: jonk@jskent.com (Jonathan Kaplan)
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 1999 15:22:04 -0700
TO: Pat, Phil, Dennis, Don, Jay,Joe, Guy, Eric, Bill, Bruce, Larry, Dale and Terry, Well, I spoke this morning to someone at M2 (Mike was on vacation), and they confirmed that their balun shouldn't b
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00093.html (11,277 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu