Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 412 ]

Total 412 documents matching your query.

221. Re: [TowerTalk] Dipole Center Connector (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 22:46:43 -0500
My take is if you can get 2:1 SWR anywhere on the band, you will have plenty of power going out, and I would not worry about whether my tuner could get me down to 1:1 or anywhere in between. If you c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00422.html (8,161 bytes)

222. Re: [TowerTalk] bIG ANTENNA PROBLEM (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:18:52 -0500
Greetings Jim -- I enjoyed the story about your 80 meter antenna, and especially appreciate the advice to quit burying about what does not work, and focus on what does. Just put up the best antenna y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00442.html (9,551 bytes)

223. Re: [TowerTalk] Push Up Mast Guying and loading (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:39:13 -0500
What are the masts made of? == James - K8JHR == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00470.html (7,406 bytes)

224. Re: [TowerTalk] Max height of aluminum tubing mast? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:02:00 -0500
Why not ask DX0-engineering - they sell large masts of up to 65 feet and sell aluminum tubing for masts. I just erected their 43 foot alum mast antenna. Why ask them? They can say what they sell. Aft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00472.html (7,985 bytes)

225. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12 80M Sigma vertical problem (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 21:19:50 -0500
1) I agree, a line isolator might help. 2) ALSO - I would strongly suggest higher strength coax, maybe LMR-400 or bigger. Just MY take. Good Luck, Steve. == Richards - K8JHR == == - _________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00512.html (7,264 bytes)

226. Re: [TowerTalk] 43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun type (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:26:55 -0500
I cannot see that, myself, can you explain why you think so? I am thinking it is not 1/2 of 102 feet... and is not a dipole.... and there is no equivalent of the 32 (+/-) vertical window line radiato
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00554.html (10,271 bytes)

227. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing guy wires (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 12:41:16 -0500
Pardon me... but don't these come with some sort of instruction manual you could consult? I thought you could get instructions even for older used towers... I would think the manual would tell you th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00556.html (7,564 bytes)

228. Re: [TowerTalk] 43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun type (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 00:54:49 -0500
No problem... just sit back, have a beer, and enjoy the weekend. And I will drink to that ! Happy trails and 73. -- Richards - K8JHR -- == _______________________________________________ ____________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00568.html (11,126 bytes)

229. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 16:46:54 -0500
Yes - I would buy one immediately and install it on my vertical. (Marketing gurus pay attention!) == Richards - K8JHR == powered, == _______________________________________________ __________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00587.html (8,046 bytes)

230. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:08:58 -0500
-- 1 -- Good question. My target price would be around $1 G. That is my current threshold for economic pain on this item. If costing more, I would probably think about it awhile, or just stick to wha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00599.html (10,689 bytes)

231. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:17:57 -0500
Hi Gary -- YOU RAISE A GOOD POINT ABOUT WEATHER PROOFING. i have one of these verticals - just put it up - and I live in Michigan and we get nearly the amount of snow you get in Wisc. Unless a better
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00600.html (11,143 bytes)

232. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:32:06 -0500
Hey -- I just say an ad in QST for an Array Solutions 800 WATT REMOTE TUNER = CG-5000 Automatic Antenna Tuner // Cost = $980. // http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/cg_5000.htm Hmmm.... maybe this
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00601.html (10,098 bytes)

233. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:02:21 -0500
Hmnmmm... I think it would pop of it got wet or if condensation or water dripped on it. I discovered that as a kid... dropping water on a hot bulb to hear it sizzle... you know... a 5th grader stunt.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00604.html (10,776 bytes)

234. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 19:05:14 -0500
I am a rookie at all this... so please be patient. I thought the instructions to the tuner said you have to reduce power to the antenna-tuner and tune with like only 5-10 watts of power, and then put
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00605.html (10,449 bytes)

235. Re: [TowerTalk] remote enclosures for electronics Re: Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:00:11 -0500
Interesting ideas, Jim. Had those heat tapes on the house as a kid in Michigan. Avoided ice under the shingles. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ ________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00621.html (11,617 bytes)

236. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 22:04:49 -0500
CG unit is built in China.... and the Chinese are notorious for running rough shod over patents... I have a huge fountain pen collection - many with Chinese knockoffs - so I have both. The 200 watt u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00622.html (10,956 bytes)

237. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 04:54:55 -0500
I think you meant to post the link to the 1500 w tuner, not the 200 w tuner.... and the big boy costs a mere $2100 with shipping extra. Maybe it would work, but it is rather expensive! == Richards -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00630.html (7,442 bytes)

238. Re: [TowerTalk] Was "43ft Vertical Feeding Question and Balun Type" (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:28:34 -0500
Well, shoot.... that is exactly what I am looking for! I don't mind picking it up, as I really enjoy that area of the country, having traveled through the Yorkshire Dales on several occasions. May ev
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00631.html (11,890 bytes)

239. Re: [TowerTalk] Flagpole and Stealth Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:51:30 -0500
So far, I am well pleased with my 43 foot vertical form DX-Engineering and very pleased with the service and communication I have received from them. I would start with them and see what they have th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00659.html (8,300 bytes)

240. Re: [TowerTalk] Flagpole and Stealth Antenna (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:56:33 -0500
Not a bad idea if you can wait for 6 months or more to get one... I wonder about hiding or disguising the matching unit that is kinda large... DX-Engineering and some others can make you a custom set
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-11/msg00660.html (8,162 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu