Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jruing@ameritech.net: 412 ]

Total 412 documents matching your query.

361. Re: [TowerTalk] phasing verticals (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:31:21 -0400
Lumped elements.... ___ Is that like when I tell the XYL I want a multiple phased array antenna system.... ... and my XYL says I gotta ... "Lump it." ____ [Sorry... could not resist trying to have so
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00223.html (7,727 bytes)

362. Re: [TowerTalk] WANTED ICE Mono-bandpass Filters (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:02:36 -0400
They sell them here: http://www.iceradioproducts.com/ or here: http://www.arraysolutions.com/Products/wx0bbpf6.htm and maybe here but I am not quite sure...: http://www.polezero.com/products.aspx Is
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00280.html (8,034 bytes)

363. Re: [TowerTalk] WANTED ICE Mono-bandpass Filters (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:38:12 -0400
Sorry..... my bad. Silly me. == K8JHR == == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://list
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00284.html (7,726 bytes)

364. Re: [TowerTalk] Loaded vertical questions. (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:17:46 -0400
I thought the same thing... you do not explain why you don't go up to approx 32-33 feet tall and make it a good quarter wave on 40 M. Any reason not? == K8JHR == == __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00287.html (7,833 bytes)

365. Re: [TowerTalk] How close? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:27:36 -0400
Gee... Rudy was not all that negative... he just told him it would be "depressing" -- and I agree. That seems mighty close not to couple. So... I suppose Pete has some research to do. To see just how
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00288.html (8,328 bytes)

366. Re: [TowerTalk] roof mount Tripod (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:43:14 -0400
Nice images on your webpage, Larry. Did the you have to reinforce the roof or trusses underneath before installing the roof towers? Here in Michigan, we are told to reinforce the underlying trusses -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00303.html (7,752 bytes)

367. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 18:49:32 -0400
I am so happy with my experience putting up a DX-Engineering 43 foot vertical monopole, that I could become their celebrity spokesperson... Well,... maybe I stretch the "celebrity" bit... ;-) But the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00304.html (7,340 bytes)

368. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:28:44 -0400
I figured it like this... If I purchased all parts separately, I have no one to blame but myself if it does not work, especially I assembled tubing from multiple sources, I cannot blame any one sourc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00404.html (10,873 bytes)

369. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:47:47 -0400
Oh dear... I don't think that is a good plan. After erecting my 43 footer, I do not think it would be a good 43 foot mast to hold a dipole. Maybe only ten or 15 feet of it would do that safely. There
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00405.html (9,864 bytes)

370. Re: [TowerTalk] roof mount Tripod (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:15:52 -0400
Gee Larry... I don't really think that is such a comforting comment. . . . . I think that is just the sort of worry my wife has about putting holes in the roof... ;-) == Richards - K8JHR == If the an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00409.html (8,745 bytes)

371. Re: [TowerTalk] roof mount Tripod (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:30:14 -0400
HEY LARRY. .... I was reading in QST today... and SAW YOUR 20 M MOXON ARTICLE !! Very cool and excellent photos and explanation. I was just tooling around the magazine when I thought I recognized you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00437.html (9,177 bytes)

372. Re: [TowerTalk] roof mount Tripod (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:09:12 -0400
Don't worry... I cannot be bought... well... er.... let's just say you cannot afford my price. I will vote, anyway. And back to tower talk ... I am looking forward to your photos on how you reinforce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00449.html (9,946 bytes)

373. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:39:08 -0400
Man with two watches never knows what time it is... Not on topic, but makes me think of why one might want only one antenna per band. Just posing the other side of the argument. ;-) == K8JHR == == __
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00502.html (7,928 bytes)

374. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in pond (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:45:07 -0400
I have a good friend, and an old ham, retired electrical engineer, who has a vertical and a dipole over a swamp and he says both works swell. == K8JHR == _____________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00503.html (7,957 bytes)

375. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in pond (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 23:19:59 -0400
It seems to me that electrolytes need not always be from salt. Electrolyte: A chemical compound that ionizes when dissolved or molten to produce an electrically conductive medium. Could a fresh water
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00506.html (8,602 bytes)

376. Re: [TowerTalk] SteppIR vs Butternut (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 00:52:44 -0400
Sorry.... misplaced attempt at humor... This attempt totally missed the mark. Sorry for the wasted bandwidth. (Sheepish grin.) Happy trails. == JHR == _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00511.html (7,831 bytes)

377. Re: [TowerTalk] Towers, real estate values and health hazards (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:30:09 -0400
This discussion of real estate values seems misplaced. It believe it is beyond the pale some people will not care, and others will care, about a tower in the neighborhood, or on a parcel under consid
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00515.html (10,238 bytes)

378. Re: [TowerTalk] Vertical in pond (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 01:59:48 -0400
So... I guess I will wanna run the sprinklers all summer in the back yard.... the wife will like that. I think it is a waste... but now I guess she gets her way back there! Not sure I will tell her m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00519.html (8,391 bytes)

379. Re: [TowerTalk] vertical in pond (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:11:22 -0400
The discussion on putting your antenna over a bod of fresh water leaves me with these general conclusions: 1) It is difficult to quantify the positive effects of placing your antenna over fresh water
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00567.html (8,872 bytes)

380. Re: [TowerTalk] DX Engineering 66-Foot Vertical? (score: 1)
Author: Richards <jruing@ameritech.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:01:52 -0400
I saw ya coming, friend -- http://k8jhr.com/linked/43_ft_vertical_antenna.pdf == Richards - K8JHR == _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ To
/archives//html/Towertalk/2009-03/msg00602.html (10,578 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu