Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4ik@subich.com: 132 ]

Total 132 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] W0IYH Feed line Choke Performance (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue Aug 19 15:20:31 2003
Here is the WA2SRQ data from my personal archive ... -- Having access to a Hewlett-Packard 4193A vector impedance meter at work, I have made measurements on a number of baluns, coaxial and otherwise.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-08/msg00684.html (16,940 bytes)

2. [Towertalk] FW: [FCG] multi-element vertical phasing? (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2002 11:30:01 -0500
Forwarded: please reply to k4vud@hotmail.com -- -- Hello, I have an installed HYGain HyTower and one ready to put up... I want to phase them but am confused about the separation distance... I want it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-11/msg00154.html (6,840 bytes)

3. [Towertalk] Towers in Hurricanes (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 20:19:23 -0400
Two or three of the TV broadcast towers in Miami came down during Andrew. I know the WTVJ (then WCIX) tower came down on top of the transmitter building trapping a couple of engineers for a couple d
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-08/msg00747.html (8,417 bytes)

4. [Towertalk] Anyone have Trylon Titan self supporting? Curious as to qual... (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:24:40 -0400
On the other hand, the AN tower has sufficient capacity to be useful in high windload areas (like Florida, coastal Carolinas, etc.). Even the heaviest Trylon towers are not spec'd for a big tribande
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-07/msg00050.html (7,336 bytes)

5. [Towertalk] Force 12 needs to do more homework (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 10:19:02 -0400
I have to step in here as Force 12 is getting a bum rap. The C31XR appears to work properly "out of the box" if one is installing it in the single feedline mode (as it was designed). Bob 5B4AGN has i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00237.html (9,059 bytes)

6. [Towertalk] Seeking input for new antenna. (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 10:24:10 -0400
Carl, I can echo Hasan's comments ... Look into a log periodic as an option. I won't deal with a specific choice of brand but I have run models for a couple of the 18 foot, eight or nine element LPs.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00284.html (9,585 bytes)

7. [Towertalk] FW: ARLB029 Landmark bill could provide amateurs relief from restrictive (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 20:58:41 -0400
--Original Message-- From: ARRL Web site [mailto:memberlist@www.arrl.org] Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 5:10 PM To: k4ik@subich.com Cc: Subscribed ARRL Members: Subject: ARLB029 Landmark bill could pro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00370.html (10,112 bytes)

8. [Towertalk] First day at Dayton - Attendance continues to slide (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 18 May 2002 15:26:25 -0400
Even 1996 is recent in the attendance slide at Dayton. Having been there every year from 1970 through the mid-1990's (before the move south), the decline really started in the early to mid-1980's. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00465.html (9,070 bytes)

9. [Towertalk] Dayton Attendence (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 11:46:22 -0400
Just about anyone in the television industry will have problems with the May dates ... they're right in the middle of the "Sweeps" and most stations will not allow time off for news and/or engineerin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00514.html (9,143 bytes)

10. [Towertalk] Windload "partway up" (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 11:29:39 -0400
The handling of side mounted loads depends on the nature of the TOWER SYSTEM. If one is dealing with a free standing tower, the failure modes are either due to side loads (wind) or crushing (total w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00649.html (7,835 bytes)

11. [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs? (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 12:20:24 -0400
Fred, Doesn't "annoyance" give some overly zealous architectural review committee an opportunity to declare a tower "offensive" or a "nuisance?" Wouldn't a simple prohibition of commercial structures
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00672.html (7,854 bytes)

12. [Towertalk] Why capacity hats on 40-2CD (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 16:32:40 -0400
AO tells me that the capacity hats on the D-40 (or 40-2CD) shorten the element tips by about 26 inches. Ran my D-40 (40-2CD) driven element model with and without the capacity rods ... and the tip ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00500.html (8,839 bytes)

13. [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:25:14 -0400
Paul, You're only partially correct (if I may argue with a lawyer on a legal issue). If the laws concerning Homeowner Associations (or private contracts) permit actions which are unconstitutional ..
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00788.html (9,687 bytes)

14. [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:57:59 -0400
Paul, That's exactly the point ... when the HOA steps into areas that are traditionally the province of government (e.g.. freedom of speech, due process, regulation of interstate commerce, land use,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00806.html (11,905 bytes)

15. [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:08:07 -0400
Mick, Please send a copy of that document, if you still have it, to the ARRL. It would be a perfect exhibit for the effort to have congress enact invalidate anti-tower, anti-ham CC&Rs. Lest anyone h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00808.html (9,986 bytes)

16. [Towertalk] ABC Home Owners Assoc Expose (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:18:13 -0400
Perhaps a more appropriate action is to go back to those same state legislatures that have adopted PRB-1 type "reasonable accommodation" language and ask them to extend those statures to apply to pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00810.html (10,172 bytes)

17. [Towertalk] Hy=Gain 402BA-S (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:30:26 -0400
You are correct, Steve. The old Hy-Gain design used the standard driven element insulators in the clamshells of the 402BA but placed the linear loading between the feedpoint and the elements rather
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00884.html (8,111 bytes)

18. [Towertalk] Re: unsubsribing (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:44:24 -0400
You're missing it! Read all the way to the bottom of the page (in the very center) and you will find: It's all right there if one simply looks!
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg01105.html (7,636 bytes)

19. [Towertalk] grounding an elevated vertical (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 09:08:55 -0500
More like 80% efficiency (1 dB loss) Not according to professional field strength measurements. The key here is the existence of the original radials. They make a major difference in ground conducti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00100.html (10,770 bytes)

20. [Towertalk] deed restrictions (score: 1)
Author: k4ik@subich.com (Joe Subich, K4IK)
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 16:58:21 -0500
Back off the attack level just a bit. Although some homeowner associations are serious about enforcing their CC&Rs, "homeowner association nazis" is unnecessary ... and I'm offended by it. In case a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-03/msg00336.html (9,682 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu