Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4oj@tampabay.rr.com: 496 ]

Total 496 documents matching your query.

281. [Towertalk] rotator tune-up checklist (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:36:50 -0400
HA HA HA Been there done that.....Dad used to have a special shallow cardboard box he would use when he seperated the housing halves on the Ham-M....otherwise know as.... "Their Off" boing boing boin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00624.html (9,426 bytes)

282. [Towertalk] K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:43:33 -0400
INQUIRING MINDS WANNA KNOW - CAN YOU FIND OUT AN EPISODE NUMBER, ETC.... LLAP SP0CK
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00625.html (8,978 bytes)

283. [Towertalk] K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 23:53:45 -0400
please, only the Kingon Seven station
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00626.html (9,051 bytes)

284. [Towertalk] K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 00:16:09 -0400
Careful, Steve may envoke General order #5 ...ever worked with XE1IIJ/K0DQ? ...damnit Jim, he's just a country tower installer
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00630.html (9,906 bytes)

285. [Towertalk] K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 00:26:08 -0400
that expliains his low contest scores of late - he is using a cloaking device B0NES
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00631.html (11,234 bytes)

286. [Towertalk] K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 00:42:50 -0400
Ya know, I heard him on ssb once - sounded like "HoH Soch bang Xray HoD" guy he was talkin' too was somebody named "Chang" think he called him a General or something.... Something about successfully
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00632.html (9,316 bytes)

287. [Towertalk] re: K7LXC (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 10:59:06 -0400
...agreed on all counts - but since this is an antenna/tower forum we should not talk up the WPX CW contest this weekend where some of us will be using funky calls like WC4E. K4OJ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00647.html (8,386 bytes)

288. [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs? (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 09:06:51 -0400
BE VERY CAREFUL HERE - SPECIFYING WHAT IS AND ISN'T OK CAN COME BACK TO BITE YOU AND OTHERS.... RECOMMEND YOU WORK WITH THE ARRL ON THIS - YOU MIGHT TRY THE ANTENNA LAW REFLECTOR, TOO... Like I say t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00663.html (9,375 bytes)

289. [Towertalk] Ham friendly CC&Rs? (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 09:21:55 -0400
I have indeed mis-spoken - the 200 foot requirement is the only thing alluded to in FCC docs regarding your license (or at least used to be)....other than that it has been no questions asked.... late
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00665.html (11,169 bytes)

290. [Towertalk] There are no dumb questions on Tower Talk, only dumb answerrs! (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 21:25:02 -0400
...........somebody ages ago pointed out that on one install they had improved (decreased) their feedline loss by using some better hard line for part of the run - as it turned out the adding of two
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00738.html (12,489 bytes)

291. [Towertalk] There are no dumb questions on Tower Talk, only dumb answers! (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:43:15 -0400
while the perfect splice is non apparent at HF according to Tom, W8JI and others - in my real world I say minimized the connectors, minimize the splices...they are only potential failure points, espe
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00783.html (11,178 bytes)

292. [Towertalk] Height above ground 6 Meters (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 18:46:34 -0400
Boom 75 feet - at 6 meters...how many elements! Also - what is your desired footprint - where do you want to be loud - N6BV all the right angles does a good job of explaining why sometimes low is goo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00784.html (7,611 bytes)

293. [Towertalk] All The Right Angles (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:50:18 -0400
Good question...from W4RNL resource page the publisher is named as LTA - I know Radio Bookstore took over some of the LTA lines but do not see this book listed on their web page... Author: R. Dean St
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00789.html (8,113 bytes)

294. Fw: [Towertalk] All The Right Angles attn: K4BEV et al (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:40:50 -0400
de author of All The Right Angles N6BV: the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00811.html (6,844 bytes)

295. [Towertalk] Bip Bop (score: 1)
Author: k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 11:08:34 -0400
K4XS has had great success bipping and bopping for years...I think this is because he has the real thing - stacks of big yagis placed at calculated heights to produce the desired footprints. ...I am
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-05/msg00814.html (9,203 bytes)

296. [Towertalk] taping your joint (score: 1)
Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 10:14:45 -0500
so, you are saying that a wrap of tape coated with Scotchkote to seal it followed by a UV shielding protective wrap of 88 is overkill, now? what is amazing to me is the number of guys who appear to b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00004.html (10,017 bytes)

297. [Towertalk] The Ham Radio Business (score: 1)
Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 19:34:06 -0500
Are we sure this isn't all planned obsolesence? Very few can afford to routinely buy a new HF rig with a four digit price tag... So, we do it say once or twice a cycle, mebbe... SO, if a compnay has
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00041.html (14,107 bytes)

298. [Towertalk] The Ham Radio Business (Longer post laced with personal opinion) (score: 1)
Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2002 21:41:34 -0500
....if you like "real ham radio" I recommend you check out your local contesting club...it may be the last vestage of HF operators who still know how to make dipoles or dip finals! 73, Jim, K4OJ firs
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00054.html (18,274 bytes)

299. [Towertalk] Tower base "solution" (score: 1)
Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 22:05:49 -0500
Chris, I suspect you are new to this list... One of the things the moderator, K7LXC, repeats over and over again is to do what the manufacturer calls for. As a professional I know whaty he is saying
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00164.html (12,225 bytes)

300. [Towertalk] 40m beams (score: 1)
Author: Jim White" <k4oj@tampabay.rr.com (Jim White)
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 16:37:56 -0400
Every so often this topic re-surfaces...so, I will take the turn this time... The 40-2CD works very very well... I really would love to see someone develope a 40-3CD or 40-4CD based upon it... It see
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00233.html (10,941 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu