Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k4sb@bellsouth.net: 79 ]

Total 79 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] Help in planning a new QTH (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:59:11 +0000
snipped.... I would tend to agree more with Steve and Dave on this matter. There is simply no way in the world ( short of an advanced antenna range ) to determine how an individual element in the Ste
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00395.html (10,269 bytes)

22. Re: [TowerTalk] Help in planning a new QTH (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 17:22:11 +0000
-- My original message referred ONLY to an installed installation, and manual attempts to optimize it. Sorry if I confused anyone. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ See: http://ww
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00397.html (9,251 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] (no subject) (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 17:49:03 +0000
-- Boom length is quite a bit more than a "key" contributor. It is the most critical factor in the design of any yagi. This has been addressed so many times by so many highly experienced antenna ind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00472.html (8,375 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Help in planning a new QTH (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 18:09:20 +0000
-- Nope on both of the above. The highest gain possible in a yagi antenna is when the spacing between the elements is infinitely small, and by infinitely small, I am speaking of something like S=.00
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00475.html (9,188 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Porqupines (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 20:20:55 +0000
-- I think we're talking metal vs another type of conductor. Porcupines are not made to prevent a strike, but to siphon off static electricity and prevent it from reaching a critical point. Good case
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00571.html (8,995 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] Porqupines (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:29:57 +0000
Well, those "reputable researchers" do not include Boeing, Airbus Industries, the McDonald Iron Works, or any other aircraft manufacturer. Believe what you want. Ed __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00586.html (9,444 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] Porqupines (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 22:32:32 +0000
Read the message again. I said "conductors OTHER than metal. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00587.html (9,170 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Ground planewire. Insulated or uninsulated? (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 05:15:49 +0000
One big difference in the type wire used is the soil common in your area. For instance, GA has very acid soil in my area, so copper is out of the question. I use galvanized ground rods and insulated
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00697.html (8,064 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] A3 (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:15:20 +0000
That doesn't make sense. At what frequencies. If you're flat across the whole band, you've got a bad problem. And the loss from a 1.3:1 SWR is not enough to even worry about. Good man! 73 Ed ________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00785.html (8,003 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] A3S (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 05:23:03 +0000
Assume you meant to type 20 here. You have a very serious problem. Which will probably require a complete disassembly of both the traps and element sections. Antennas for 15 and 10 do not exhibit 1:1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00786.html (8,000 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Thanks and !!! (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:11:09 +0000
-- Probably the best place would be a hamfest for the pot. As far as the connector hookup goes, I have 4 tailtwisters and I modified all of them by using a heavy duty connecter from Davis RF. Think t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00823.html (7,876 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Moxon rectangles (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:20:22 +0000
-- This may be a case of a simple ommision on Tom's part or an assumption that the rest of us know as much as he does. However, if you use an electrical 1/2 wave line connected to the antenna, the im
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00824.html (8,637 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] FW: Moxon rectangles (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 05:57:09 +0000
I did not speak of trying to cover an entire band. By definition, an electrical 1/2 wave is that at only 1 frequency. As a matter of course, every 1/2 wave line I have is cut for 25 kHz up from the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00827.html (8,153 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] When a Yagi Loses an Element (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 06:37:08 +0000
Fairly simple solution. I believe the boom on this antenna is 3". Get 2 3" muffler clamps and install them in such a manner that the center of balance is displaced to that of the original configurati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00080.html (8,753 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 16:30:05 +0000
-- I don't have any nearby stations with my 259, but a friend of mine does. What I did was use an ICE 160 meter low pass filter which has an extremely high cutoff frequency at 1.6 Mhz. It's normally
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00091.html (7,894 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 04:32:40 +0000
Not according to the spec sheet which came with the unit. And as far as extraneous RF getting into that thing, it is so heavily shielded that I would say such is near to impossible. 73 Ed ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00111.html (7,573 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Antenna analyzers (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:11:40 +0000
-- Well, all I can say is that the jumper cables into and out of the unit were custom made. And when the unit is switched into the circuit in normal use, there is a very noticible drop in noise level
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00122.html (8,545 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Base mounted rotor=great idea (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 19:22:21 +0000
Jim makes a good point. And a neat trick which is probably only in the minds of us old farts is to weld a motorcycle spring to the bottom of the mast, and the other end to a short piece of mast out
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00437.html (8,207 bytes)

39. Re: [TowerTalk] Base mounted rotor=great idea (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:33:59 +0000
Yep, and a medium duty spring works well. Sort of a cut and try. Look for road kill. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers",
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00461.html (8,312 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] Base mounted rotor=great idea (score: 1)
Author: K4SB <k4sb@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 03:52:31 +0000
No, front spring of medium strength. 73 Ed _______________________________________________ See: http://www.mscomputer.com for "Self Supporting Towers", "Wireless Weather Stations", and lot's more. Ca
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-04/msg00462.html (7,646 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu