Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7acz@cox.net: 107 ]

Total 107 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [TowerTalk] PIrod 220' Tower For Sale (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2004 19:26:56 -0800
Who did they broadcast to? There's no electricity in Lancaster County, is there? All horse and buggy and candlelight, no zippers or buttons, except for the "English" people living there. -- _________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00372.html (9,065 bytes)

22. Re: [BULK] - Re: RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2004 17:46:32 -0800
When I was K6ACZ in a CC&R area I used a 36 inch MFJ tunable loop ant disguised as a TV yagi. From the ground it looked like any other TV antenna. Worked better than a low dipole or a R-7 on a 10 ft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00571.html (10,769 bytes)

23. Re: [TowerTalk] CC&Rs (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2004 11:44:37 -0800
I USED to live in a HOA/CC&R prison where the BOD would change the rules and regs when ever they saw fit. CC&R's are hard to change, Rules and regs can be changed at anytime by the BOD. When you try
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00593.html (11,491 bytes)

24. Re: [TowerTalk] Auto antenna tuner (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 16:31:15 -0800
Why not one step further and build one into the amp itself as has been done with Xcvrs? -- __________________________________________________________________________ Alan Zack Amateur Radio Station K
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00619.html (12,502 bytes)

25. Re: [TowerTalk] Bang for the buck? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2004 17:09:09 -0800
Hi Craig, Your story is similar to mine. I see you are in Reno. I am in Las Vegas. Clark County, the City of Las Vegas, and the City of Henderson (where I live) all have gone to IBC-2000 90 MPH wind
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-03/msg00621.html (11,501 bytes)

26. Re: [TowerTalk] UBC On-Line? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2004 13:07:33 -0700
I am dealing with getting a bldg code under IBC-2000 with 90 MPH wind calcs (70 MPH wind calcs and stress analysis under the older UBC-97 ARE NOT acceptable). I would first go to the tower manufactur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00126.html (11,066 bytes)

27. Re: [TowerTalk] HF beam antenna decision (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 18:21:04 -0700
I think the design behind the SteppIR is great also. I would order one EXCEPT it's elements are 36 ft long. Fine if you have a nice piece of land of a couple of acres or so but it's a little large fo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00297.html (12,598 bytes)

28. Re: [TowerTalk] Town Code Definition Conundrum (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 19:56:06 -0700
Mark, You being a PE you will know a lot more about this than I do. But I can pass on my personal experience. I wanted to put up a simple light weight 40 ft tower but my bldg dept said it had to pass
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00301.html (10,850 bytes)

29. Re: [TowerTalk] Town Code Definition Conundrum (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 20:09:24 -0700
Jim, At my bldg dept IBC-2000 is the Bible and final word as to the structural requirements. Couldn't you refer to section 3108 of IBC-2000 and ask where is the fallback requirement? Besides the bldg
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00303.html (10,854 bytes)

30. Re: [TowerTalk] Town Code Definition Conundrum (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 11:54:17 -0700
Jeff: I am curious as to when this occurred as I am told most bldg dept went away from UBC-97 and started using IBC-2000 in the last year or so. I tried to get (beg is more like it) my bldg dept to a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00334.html (10,681 bytes)

31. Re: [TowerTalk] Town Code Definition Conundrum (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 12:04:07 -0700
Jim, I stand corrected. That's very good to know. I do know the zoning rules and bldg permits are two different animals, I just didn't know which one dealt with setbacks and so I used the don't ask,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00335.html (14,180 bytes)

32. Re: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 13:20:53 -0700
How do they compare uv wise in a hot Las Vegas sky? -- __________________________________________________________________________ Alan Zack Amateur Radio Station K7ACZ Las Vegas, Nevada, USA Quality
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00518.html (11,947 bytes)

33. Re: [TowerTalk] OT: Ham Law (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 17:19:39 -0700
Negative. Please note: "Please send your subscribe request to ham-law-request@altlaw.com." You put your request (subscribe or unsubscribe, at least) in the body of the e-mail. -- ____________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00538.html (9,032 bytes)

34. Re: [TowerTalk] Mystery Hy-Gain tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 23:21:52 -0700
I agree with J. Hector. A Mosley usually has one trap per element leg, where Cushcraft and Hy-Gain have two. And Mosley has a direct connection to the driven element, no matching devices, but I usual
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00607.html (11,506 bytes)

35. Re: [TowerTalk] Mystery Hy-Gain tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 13:22:50 -0700
Scott said there was no matching devices on the yagi. You say the SYS-36 has a hairpin matching device. I have a Mosley TA-33 that sounds very much like what Scott is describing. I'd suggest checking
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00644.html (11,935 bytes)

36. Re: [TowerTalk] Mystery Hy-Gain tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 14:52:24 -0700
Mark, I have to disagree with you. Below is the direct quote from the Mosley web site FAQ page: http://www.mosley-electronics.com/faq.htm Besides my using a Mosley at home they were used at most of t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00654.html (13,578 bytes)

37. Re: [TowerTalk] Mystery Hy-Gain tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:00:35 -0700
I'm talking about a TA-33. No one has mentioned a Classic except for you. Read MY postings that you are referring to...... -- _________________________________________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00677.html (17,069 bytes)

38. Re: [TowerTalk] Mystery Hy-Gain tribander (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2004 00:05:35 -0700
You will have to argue with the Mosley engineers, not me. That was a direct quote from: http://www.mosley-electronics.com/faq.htm Works fine for me plus a whole bunch of LORAN station ham stations. -
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00678.html (11,758 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] Heights Towers (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2004 20:46:57 -0700
Anyone out there using a Heights tower? Having gotten my Bldg permit I am now ready to order a 40 ft crank up Heights Tower. I am trying to decide if I should put out the extra $315.00 for an electri
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00578.html (7,259 bytes)

40. Re: [TowerTalk] RF exposure and my neighbor (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 19:55:48 -0700
Did you get a bldg permit when putting up the tower? With a permit you have some protection that the city inspected and approved the tower, without a permit, if enough people complained, you might ha
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-06/msg00656.html (12,677 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu