Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7acz@cox.net: 107 ]

Total 107 documents matching your query.

81. Re: [TowerTalk] connector pl 259 (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:28:03 -0800
Massimo, If you mean a 90 degree connector they are UHF-7613P connectors, UHF Right Angle Male to Female Adapter. 73 Massimo Taddei wrote: Hi all, Does exist connector rigth angle male UHF? (PL259) A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00288.html (8,519 bytes)

82. [TowerTalk] I.C.E. Products waterproofing (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 08:44:46 -0800
I have just received my recent order of I.C.E. coax Suppressors including the Model 349 Rotor control wire protector. I will be installing these at the base of my tower using the ICE 318-4 mounting f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00511.html (8,163 bytes)

83. Re: [BULK] - Re: [TowerTalk] Vacuum tube 100 years old today (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:08:11 -0800
One of the projects I worked on at the former Rockwell Intl (now part of Boeing) was the MX Missile project. Down the hall from us was the Minuteman labs. Going to the Minuteman Labs was like going t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00516.html (12,526 bytes)

84. Re: [TowerTalk] ICE Suppressor Placement? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:31:49 -0800
In my situation I have only a 20 ft run from the ham shack to the tower. I attached my ICE devices to my grounds at the base of the tower. The grounds there are the UFER system attached to the rebar
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00518.html (9,857 bytes)

85. [TowerTalk] Tower Installation (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 12:41:19 -0800
I am at the final stages of my tower installation. The hole digging, concrete work, grounding, etc, have been done by a professional cel phone tower installer who does ham towers as a sideline. My to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00532.html (8,573 bytes)

86. Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for some tower advice (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:11:17 -0800
Hi Jim, I was in your same position about 6 months ago. At first I planned to use a US Towers tower as I had visited their factory several times as part of the Intl DX Convention at Visalia and their
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-11/msg00584.html (11,893 bytes)

87. Re: [TowerTalk] Bounces replies--- tnx to all (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 16:26:57 -0800
It's been like that for months. With every post you get the geo888@cs.com bounce message. Just something to ignore until its fixed. jimjarvis@comcast.net wrote: Guys... Thanks to all who responded wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00098.html (9,407 bytes)

88. Re: [TowerTalk] 50 ft self supporting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2004 16:42:52 -0800
My city required 90 MPH wind calcs per IBC-2000. UBC-97 specs were rejected. They will most likely require the calcs to be wet stamped by a PE licensed in your state. If you are buying a new tower ge
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00099.html (9,657 bytes)

89. Re: [TowerTalk] insurance (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 16:25:46 -0800
Is the Insurance company policies offering the ARRL policies considered a Homeowners policy? Seems it is more specialized as to ham radio gear INCLUDING towers and antennas. Reason I ask is the compa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-12/msg00584.html (9,659 bytes)

90. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotating Dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 00:19:46 -0800
Don't use: http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz/intro.htmoriginal Instead go to: http://www.qsl.net/ve6wz It is working now. daniel hearn wrote: TTers, the URL below worked this morning. I had it stored in my Bo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00172.html (10,178 bytes)

91. Re: [TowerTalk] Force 12? (score: 1)
Author: "Alan C. Zack" <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 19:42:44 -0800
I am not happy with F12. They acknowledged an item of my shipment WAS missing and then told me it was MY problem and I had to go to their vendor to get the part (a $3.00 item). That was after over 25
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00208.html (9,903 bytes)

92. Re: [TowerTalk] geo888@cs.com (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 15:20:44 -0800
That would mean everyone using CALLSIGN@arrl.net, CALLSIGN@jarl.net, CALLSIGN@darc.net, etc., would be dropped. Mike D. wrote: Jim, Thanks for your note. Yes, you, et al, might "like" using an alias
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00319.html (13,979 bytes)

93. Re: [TowerTalk] geo888@cs.com (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:04:36 -0800
I believe that is a decision that should be made by the list administrator, not you. Until the administrator closes the topic it would be open to discussion by interested users of the reflector to pr
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00320.html (13,325 bytes)

94. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Conundrum (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 00:28:25 -0800
I would recommend Heights Towers. I recently purchased and installed a 45 ft free standing crank-up/fold-over Heights Tower. I needed 90 MPH wind calcs in order to get my Bldg permit and Drake at Hei
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00469.html (13,068 bytes)

95. Re: [TowerTalk] Adding ground rods, effect on ground resistance.. (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 11:18:09 -0800
Question please, I have three 8 ft ground rods at the base of my tower, connected to each tower leg, tied together by a nr 2 wire plus tied to my rebar cage in the concrete (the rods are outside the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00702.html (14,156 bytes)

96. Re: [TowerTalk] horizontally polarized antennas and salt water (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 08:15:30 -0800
I'm not sure about the salt in the water. Maybe it does help. When I was based in Alaska I put a simple 4BTV vert with a 80M resonator on top (guess that made it a 5BTV) into the ground behind the Qu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00762.html (11,766 bytes)

97. Re: [TowerTalk] Ways To Tilt Over a Light Tower ? (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:08:45 -0800
Tall 40 ft towers work better than short 40 ft towers. Rick Karlquist wrote: douglas.snowden@med.va.gov said: I have a short 40 foot aluminum tower that I use for experimentation - At the moment it i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00781.html (10,047 bytes)

98. Re: RE : [TowerTalk] New FCC chariman needs to be a HAM! (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:34:36 -0800
IMO that's what is wrong with Boeing now. When I worked for Rockwell Intl (North American Aviation Div) the engineers worked their way up to the Division President and V.P. slots. When contracts were
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00973.html (11,989 bytes)

99. Re: [TowerTalk] Shack wiring (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:17:38 -0800
Maybe check to see if your house has aluminum wiring with copper pigtails at the wall sockets and switches. Was quite common in the 1970's or so and the wire nuts on the pigtails need to be tightened
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01043.html (11,585 bytes)

100. Re: [TowerTalk] Shack wiring (score: 1)
Author: Alan Zack <k7acz@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:21:10 -0800
Maybe that a pk to pk reading with your shack O-Scope and do the math to find the RMS, Average, etc. Pete Smith wrote: At 11:07 AM 1/24/2005, W8JI wrote: So you need two meters Pete...you need to mea
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01047.html (12,121 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu