Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7xn@cox.net: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] TA-53-M (score: 1)
Author: k7xn@cox.net (Mike Warnock)
Date: Wed Jan 29 16:29:55 2003
Recently purchased older Mosley TA-53-m withTA-40-KR (40m) kit. I have disassembled, cleaned up and reassembled the antenna. Two questions: 1. Does the grounding strap at the center of the 20/40 driv
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-01/msg00547.html (6,852 bytes)

2. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: TH7 Traps (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 15:39:26 -0700
Not a mechanical nor mathematical engineer but having had both TH7 and C31XR my experience is that the C31 is much better, especially on 10 and 15 meters and much easier to tune to WARC bands. No tra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00357.html (17,229 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Gov't Study to Collect Empirical Data on Towersvs.Birds... (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:07:27 -0700
Towers vs birds.....and the problem is??????? What birds? -- Original Message -- From: <BobK8IA@aol.com> To: <stevekz9g@verizon.net>; <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:5
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00492.html (10,171 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] T2X Control Box Creating RFI (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 18:15:08 -0700
I recall a similar problem at my previous qth. When my antenna was pointed in a particular direction, NE as I recall, the swr and noise rose significantly and would vanished when the antenna was turn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00493.html (10,047 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Re: Feedlines (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:48:08 -0700
I've found the days of "free" leftovers of the 75 ohm cable are non existent in Phoenix valley. Most installers have been solicited so often here that they (the installers) know they have a marketabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00619.html (8,949 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] OWL? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:02:16 -0700
At W0AIH, we made our own ladder line that was derived from 14 ga phone line as I remember. Stripped and spaced with home brewed pvc spacers some of these feeders were to antennas 500 to 800 ft from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-09/msg00621.html (10,453 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] C31-XR versus KT36XA (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 15:40:44 -0700
I had both kt34 and th6 in the 80's and 90's and found the 34 only marginally better than the th6. When moving to 7 land and complete new tower etc etc I opted for the c31xr and can only say that i f
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00041.html (21,913 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] deep base for MA-550 (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 16:52:24 -0700
As a commercial construction superintendent with 25+ years in the field I seldom have found the civil engineer to override the structural engineer's specifications. Civil engineers although very educ
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00119.html (10,899 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding website....Lyncole (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 19:00:49 -0700
these are the guys that are going to speak to us next month. they deal primarily with commercial towers and associated equipment. www.hagar.com, www.fcconnect.com and www.erico.com. Maybe more intens
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00264.html (8,886 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Site Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 17:10:21 -0700
Warren... I strip the braid out of old coax that I buy cheap at hamfests. It lies pretty flat once you get it out. The remaining center conductor can be used for radials and a host of other things. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-10/msg00445.html (9,411 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] US Towers TX-472MDPL Remote Control (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2003 16:53:28 -0700
The upside of operating the raising/lowering from towerside is watching that feeders and rotor cables don't get caught or pinched. Good luck, Mike Weather Stations", and lot's more. Call Toll Free, 1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-11/msg00014.html (9,333 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erecting tower (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2003 15:55:41 -0700
on. EXACTLY as he said. -- Original Message -- From: "Dino Darling" <k6rix@earthlink.net> To: <TowerTalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:16 PM Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] RE: Erect
/archives//html/Towertalk/2003-12/msg00140.html (11,093 bytes)

13. Re: [TowerTalk] Weight of Chromolly (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Warnock" <k7xn@cox.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 18:14:38 -0700
12# per foot would not be unreasonable considering what you may be expecting it to do. I have the same mast with a 2 el 40 and a C31XR and plans for a 80m rotatable dipole. I may overload the tower a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-01/msg00373.html (9,885 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu