Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8ri-tower@charter.net: 485 ]

Total 485 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [TowerTalk] Rotors - your thoughts please. (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 15:55:23 -0500
I hadn't seen this original post before I replied late on in the thread so I have a couple of additional comments. Although I recommended the Pro Sis Tel series in the other post, if you are only tur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00844.html (10,820 bytes)

42. Re: [TowerTalk] Frozen Rotor (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 18:53:55 -0500
I've done something similar to what Larry has done; however, I use heavy duty, flexible vinyl and fold it into a simple cone. I wrap the top of the cone around the mast above the thrust bearing so it
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00862.html (11,562 bytes)

43. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:13:09 -0500
At 12:18 PM 1/20/2005, Keith Dutson wrote: To me, the answer to your question(s) is simple. FD grounds should be for RF. It would be nice to have a safety grounding system with SPG, I don't think you
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00901.html (9,576 bytes)

44. Re: [TowerTalk] Grounding, portable generators, field day (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 23:15:39 -0500
-- Original Message -- From: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net> To: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>; <keith@dutson.net>; "'towertalk'" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Thursday, January 2
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00910.html (17,502 bytes)

45. Re: [TowerTalk] GROUNDING OF FIELD DAY STATIONS (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:30:23 -0500
Depending on the circuits a single GFI outlet at the beginning of the run will serve the entire line. That is what they did in my shop. I can actually short out one of the outlets to ground with bare
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00914.html (9,496 bytes)

46. Re: [TowerTalk] FCC Chaurman needs to be a ham (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 18:17:09 -0500
If I'm going to install a tower, I really don't have to know anything about the engineering of a tower. It helps, but it's not necessary. I do have to know who does know, or how to find who knows. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00977.html (12,029 bytes)

47. Re: [TowerTalk] FCC Chaurman needs to be a ham (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:15:19 -0500
Ahhh... If I take out the quotes there's nothing left in the previous post. Then again if there was any thing other than straight text I don't see it any way. Any post other than text shows up as a b
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00988.html (9,474 bytes)

48. [TowerTalk] Installing Ground Rods was (Tower Wench) (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 10:58:08 -0500
I still like the good old water drill. It's cheap and easy to use. http://www.rogerhalstead.com/ham_files/ground.htm I've posted it before, but I think it's germane to this discussion. It works well
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01021.html (8,072 bytes)

49. Re: [TowerTalk] Shack wiring (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 11:17:20 -0500
I'm hoping that history has added the subject of shack wiring, both RF and AC, to the range for Towertalk -- if others disagree, I apologize. My entire shack is on a single 110V circuit (separate 220
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01026.html (12,265 bytes)

50. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote station operation (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 15:21:42 -0500
It depends on how computer savvy you (or your friends)are, but using an audio interface you should be able to handle the transceiver just fine. There are rotor control boxes that interface with the c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01055.html (10,469 bytes)

51. Re: [TowerTalk] Shack wiring (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:06:12 -0500
Aluminum is about the only thing that the power company uses nowadays for the drop cable to your house. But you do not want any aluminum inside the house. Most places do not allow its installation an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01089.html (12,966 bytes)

52. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing Ground Rods was (Tower Wench) (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 01:10:03 -0500
Nice pictures Roger. Only problem with your installation method is you do not have as good a ground connection with earth as you would if they were driven in. Not at all. That's an old wive's tale. A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01090.html (10,649 bytes)

53. Re: [TowerTalk] DF Antenna (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:25:46 -0500
I read you already have a different method in mind, but I used to do DFing as part of my job. The loop antenna was several turns of insulated wire inside a copper tube with a tuning cap at the base.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01113.html (9,135 bytes)

54. [TowerTalk] Wiring and the code was (RE: TowerTalk Digest, Vol 25,Issue 139) (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 14:30:20 -0500
It may depend on where you live, but in this area of Michigan you do not have a choice. Well, you could ignore the codes and not get a building permit, but there are some stiff fines if caught with t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01114.html (19,091 bytes)

55. Re: [TowerTalk] Installing Ground Rods was (Tower Wench) (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:28:33 -0500
K8RI on Tower Talk wrote: Nice pictures Roger. Only problem with your installation method is you do not have as good a ground connection with earth as you would if they were driven in. Not at all. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01136.html (10,377 bytes)

56. Re: [TowerTalk] Conductive Concrete and Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:40:36 -0500
The one thing predictable about lightning is its unpredictability. The Science (Discovery) channel had an interesting program on this a couple of weeks back. Lightening varies greatly in strength fro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01158.html (14,025 bytes)

57. Re: [TowerTalk] Conductive Concrete and Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 21:42:24 -0500
-- Original Message -- From: "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net> To: "Charlie" <ad5th@direcway.com> Cc: "Bill Shell" <n6ws@charter.net>; "Tower Talk List" <towertalk@contesting.com> Sent: Wednes
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01159.html (13,817 bytes)

58. Re: [TowerTalk] Conductive Concrete and Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 12:38:15 -0500
Although lightning is DC (static electricity) is does tend to "ring" with a strike consisting of both positive and negative current flow. Even when flowing in one direction a waveform can contain mul
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01174.html (13,676 bytes)

59. Re: [TowerTalk] Conductive Concrete and Grounding (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 15:18:33 -0500
Trying to remember my theory... It's been a long time. I hope this makes a little sense. I think of lightning as a poor square wave. It has an fairly abrupt rise time and a bit slower fall time as I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01176.html (12,445 bytes)

60. Re: [TowerTalk] R8 vs 6BTV, etc. (score: 1)
Author: "K8RI on Tower Talk" <k8ri-tower@charter.net>
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 20:56:53 -0500
Presumably there are mechanical differences in hardware, etc., but what I'm really looking for is any noticeable "power sucking loads" that are inherent in the design (sure, our vertical has a 2:1 SW
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg01239.html (11,125 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu