Mail Archive Search: <+from:karl@dixie-net.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:karl@dixie-net.com: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Unknown Wilson Yagi? (score: 1): Author: karl@dixie-net.com (Karl Bullock); Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2001 17:56:48 -0700; Thanks to all who responded to help me identify my unknown antenna, particularly Todd, WD0T, who nailed the model number for me (the antenna WAS a Wilson SY36), and Alan, W6IST, who kindly faxed me a; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00015.html (7,723 bytes)
2. [TowerTalk] Unknown Wilson Yagi? (score: 1): Author: karl@dixie-net.com (Karl Bullock); Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 18:39:58 -0700; OK, here's the deal. I have a 6-element tribander that, at first glance, appears to be constructed similar to a Mosley Classic-36. However, after talking to Mosley, they're not sure it's theirs, but; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00724.html (7,443 bytes)
3. [TowerTalk] MFJ / Hy-Gain, cont'd. (score: 1): Author: karl@dixie-net.com (Karl Bullock); Date: Mon, 07 May 2001 13:51:04 -0500; Great comments Tom! I know Martin personally. He was my advisor when I went to school at Miss. State, and he and I have maintained the contact over the years - albeit primarily at hamfests. One thing; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-05/msg00207.html (11,012 bytes)
4. [TowerTalk] Tilt-over Towers (score: 1): Author: karl@dixie-net.com (Karl Bullock); Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 16:06:36 -0800; I checked with Rohn some time back about purchasing the parts to convert my 25G to foldover. They told me the parts were no longer available. Soooo, I took the drawings from their catalog (pretty det; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-03/msg00335.html (9,976 bytes)
5. [TowerTalk] Re: Quad vs. yagi (score: 1): Author: karl@dixie-net.com (Karl Bullock); Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2001 21:57:11 -0600; Well, I always hate these "mine vs. yours" stuff, and in the case of Quad Vs. Yagi, it seems most of the time to be "apples vs. oranges". In my mind it's always been real simple. A 2 element quad is; /archives//html/Towertalk/2001-02/msg00195.html (8,157 bytes)
6. [TowerTalk] KT-34A Tuning Problems (score: 1): Author: Karl Bullock <karl@dixie-net.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:21:44 -0500 (CDT); This one is strange. Here's the deal. The beam tuned perfectly for the previous owner. We carefully labeled the elements, and the re-assembly looks exactly like the picture in the manual. However, ac; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00196.html (7,673 bytes)
7. Re: [TowerTalk] KT-34A Tuning Problems (score: 1): Author: Karl Bullock <karl@dixie-net.com>; Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 11:03:01 -0500 (CDT); OK, thanks! I'll pull her down and try that (obviously I missed this in the archives). On the analyzer issue, I wasn't as much looking at the impedance as I was the SWR. Also, on the 10M band (since; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00205.html (9,508 bytes)
8. Re: [TowerTalk] KT-34A Tuning Problems (score: 1): Author: Karl Bullock <karl@dixie-net.com>; Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:52:00 -0500; Well, therein lies part of the problem. The balun does not check good on the analyzer, and I don't have another 4:1 balun to try on it. The beam's on a 50' fold-over tower, and it's a chore to crank; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00208.html (13,497 bytes)
9. [TowerTalk] KT34A Tuning Problem - Resolution! (score: 1): Author: Karl Bullock <karl@dixie-net.com>; Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 20:23:12 -0500; Thanks to all who responded to my KT34A problem. Marc, ON4MA suggested it might just be a loose wire in the balun. So, I used my Dremel tool to take the top off the balun, and yep - loose wire. After; /archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00282.html (7,351 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]