Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kd4e@verizon.net: 379 ]

Total 379 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Down Due To Cindy Tell New What You Think (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:20:53 -0400
As a Christian I find the term "acts of God" offensive. Can I get the Supreme Court to rule it out as unconstitutional and replace it with "acts of Darwin" or something? Oh, and how about an apology
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00363.html (9,047 bytes)

102. Re: [TowerTalk] Radio remote control? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 08:22:10 -0400
I have a pair of GINA 7000N's. They provide wireless RS-232 plus a wireless voice line. Neat little gadgets. Details here: http://www.rock2000.com/wireless/7000n.htm They may be had for less than 1/1
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00469.html (8,825 bytes)

103. Re: [TowerTalk] Radio remote control? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:00:46 -0400
A TowerTalk member sent me a message and said that a TT member may be interested in the pair of GINA's I offered him. "However, a point-to-point link for voice and high-speed data would be just right
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00539.html (9,720 bytes)

104. Re: [TowerTalk] dumbing down - NVIS vs DX or ?? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:38:15 -0400
NVIS is not an all-purpose antenna, it is a specific-purpose antenna. Where a DX antenna is best suited for distant stations a NVIS is best suited for more local/regional (depending on band, conditio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00541.html (10,363 bytes)

105. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS Antennas (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:57:31 -0400
Given that we have for decades communicated with subs using miles of buried antennas, and folks like G3BDQ and others have experimented with buried Ham antennas, one is well-advised to avoid absolute
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00598.html (8,682 bytes)

106. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS Antennas (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 00:58:50 -0400
I wasn't even pretending to comment on the physics, just waxing philosophical as I wander around the 'net waiting for the xyl to return from an absurdly extended on-call day working at the hospital.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00603.html (9,368 bytes)

107. Re: [TowerTalk] remote stations (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 19:35:56 -0400
Can someone discuss the complications of implementing something like this in a high lightning area like central Florida? Despite full PolyPhaser protection I still like to physically disconnect the r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00639.html (10,990 bytes)

108. [TowerTalk] FS: Kevlar Helmet - Deflect Falling Wrenches! (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 23:26:40 -0400
Kevlar (bullet-resistant) Helmet. Very good condition. Bought it for tower work, now using a foldover so don't need it. Asking $85. including shipping conus ($119-$125 online surplus sites) Note: I c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00790.html (7,550 bytes)

109. Re: [TowerTalk] insulators (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 22:22:15 -0400
Errrr ... methinks I can find room in my counseling schedule for an emergency session. Will have to check the records, ain't sure I've heard of a case this serious before. Insulatus fetish absurdus.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00801.html (8,835 bytes)

110. Re: [TowerTalk] NVIS 160 Meters [Was: RE: [NVIS] Digest Number876/NVIS 9n 160 Meters] (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 21:30:54 -0400
Given the wavelength is there any reason to believe that the same antenna at 4-8 feet above ground would perform in a significantly different manner? I will be moving some fences around and am contem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00817.html (8,277 bytes)

111. [TowerTalk] Military Aircraft Bearing OK for Tower? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 23:57:35 -0400
Just came upon this and it appears that it may have a new home on Ham towers http://www.american-milspec.com/p940.html What spec am I missing that makes it not useful as a mast bearing, please? The $
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00821.html (7,364 bytes)

112. Re: [TowerTalk] aircraft bearing (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 17:00:43 -0400
Didn't know to what you referred so did a search: http://www.ticona.com/index/products/uhmw-pe.htm This site does not mention outdoor use where degradation from intense and sustained sunlight destroy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-07/msg00857.html (9,388 bytes)

113. Re: [TowerTalk] Phillystran (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 06 Aug 2005 22:27:13 -0400
Created the new page and posted them there: http://bibleseven.com/ant.html Will try to add others as discovery and time permit. doc -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e {| /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \ {| ==\ # htt
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00139.html (8,916 bytes)

114. Re: [TowerTalk] Military Aircraft Bearing OK for Tower? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2005 17:01:08 -0400
Hey you guys! I placed my order for a bearing and it was several days before he accepted the PayPal payment ... and now he just E-mailed to say that he had sold out and had reimbursed me! Y'all clean
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00149.html (7,908 bytes)

115. Re: [TowerTalk] half square ground screens (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 09:19:12 -0400
Are the joints on that wire properly welded? Poor welds and/or rubbing wire could become diodes generating lots of noise. Also, how well will that stuff stand up in the soil in your area? In some soi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00218.html (8,272 bytes)

116. Re: [TowerTalk] Gap Titan (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 13:06:46 -0400
Perhaps if you raise the base of the GAP you might use the fence as part of your counterpoise? -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e {| /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \ {| ==\ # http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html KD4E ==
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00267.html (7,980 bytes)

117. [TowerTalk] Anyone Familiar with Rohn 45 TiltOver? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:04:05 -0400
I have a Rohn 45 TiltOver. The arm needs to be straightened and reinforced. I need to know about the cable, pulley, crank pieces. Anyone rebuilt one of these using readily available components who co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00319.html (8,073 bytes)

118. [TowerTalk] Are All Low-Pass Filters Alike? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 22:32:57 -0400
Just read the specs for the AMECO low pass filers and wondered if it is fair to guess that all 10M filers really handle meaningful 10 & 15M garbage and that a 15M filter is not really necessary? LOW
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00321.html (8,196 bytes)

119. Re: [TowerTalk] Are All Low-Pass Filters Alike? (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:15:41 -0400
I want to use the switched filters at the output of a 1KW solid state amp to prevent harmonics from escaping to the antenna. I have 40 & 20M B&W low pass filters and a ParaDynamics 10M so far. I have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00339.html (9,416 bytes)

120. Re: [TowerTalk] Are All Low-Pass Filters Alike? -- Moved to RFI List (score: 1)
Author: doc <kd4e@verizon.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 10:40:46 -0400
Thanks for the suggestion! I have subscribed there and posted my question. -- Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e {| /\ {| / \ {| / \ {| / @ \ {| ==\ # http://bibleseven.com/kd4e.html KD4E == West Central Florid
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-08/msg00342.html (9,188 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu