Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kinzli@kinzlicoils.com: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] Force 12 Sigma 40's in 4-square (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 13:48:34 -0800
Hey everyone, I'm thinking of putting up 4 of the Force 12 Sigma 40's in a 4square. I was planning on mounting the verticals on the ground (well, just up off the ground enough to clear terrain). I'm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-12/msg00946.html (6,883 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Force12 Sigma verticals (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 15:37:56 -0800
Anyone using these? If so, I'd love to talk to you about your experiences, particularly the 40m version.. Thanks, -J _______________________________________________ __________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00027.html (6,810 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Force12 LPT-1242 + 3el steppir, anyone? (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 19:47:53 -0800
Seems this would be a popular combo. Anyone out there using one of the 42' Force12 towers (self-supporting) with a 3 el steppir? I'm curious how it's holding up... Thanks, Jeff KA6LAF _______________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00279.html (7,001 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] US Tower TMM series 541SS (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 19:21:00 -0800
Hey guys, I'm looking at towers, doing some research on what tower to use. The US Tower 541SS (TMM series) looks great, because it cranks down to 12 feet (perfect) - but the windload rating is 12sqft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00382.html (6,820 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower TMM series 541SS (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 06:42:22 -0800
Thanks guys for the info. The Trylon looks good, unfortunately it's not a crankup, and due to a number of reasons, I need to use a crankup in this installation. I think I've found the tower though, s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00426.html (11,205 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] adding up wind loads (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:47:08 -0800
So I know that wind load at the top of the tower is much different than wind load 10 feet up from the top of the tower, and that towers are wind load rated at the top of the tower. I'm trying to unde
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00799.html (7,130 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] tower bases and weight versus surrounding ground (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 20:10:44 -0800
Hey there, I've been wondering this one for a while, and wonder what your thoughts are. For a self-supporting tower, how much of the base depends on the mass of the concrete, and how much of the base
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00269.html (8,081 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] Tower specs, putting a package together (score: 1)
Author: "Jeff Kinzli" <kinzli@kinzlicoils.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 12:20:09 -0800
Hey Folks, I'm working on getting some aluminum up here. The antennas I plan to use are a 4L Steppir and a 3L M2 40 (40M3L). One requirement is that this stack goes on a crank up, as I'd like it cran
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-02/msg00369.html (9,274 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu