Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kjdutson@earthlink.net: 374 ]

Total 374 documents matching your query.

161. RE: [TowerTalk] Shields (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:47:55 -0500
Perhaps we are not concerned about shielding at all but just want the lowest loss cable available, and it is shielded this way. Keith NM5G unbalanced RG8X and I'm guessing with a braid on The point i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00298.html (11,191 bytes)

162. RE: [TowerTalk] Disturbing tower picture in QST (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 10:49:48 -0500
I saw that photo and was also awe-struck with the apparent lack of concern for tower climbing safety. Keith NM5G --Original Message-- From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-bounces@
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00299.html (9,704 bytes)

163. RE: [TowerTalk] inline female coax connector? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:00:01 -0500
Age old question. It's hard to find a female PL259, which should be taken as a message: "Use a barrel connector." The insertion loss is negligible to at least 400 MHz. Keith NM5G Reading the info on
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00300.html (10,094 bytes)

164. RE: [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] inline female coax connector? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:19:57 -0500
What is the insertion loss below 400 MHz? Number in dB please. Keith NM5G Bill, the barrel connectors are double-ended SO-239 females, intended for use as a union between two PL-259 male coax lines.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00307.html (10,295 bytes)

165. RE: [BULK] - [TowerTalk] Re: [Antennas] inline female coax connec tor? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:26:33 -0500
Above 150 MHz I would think most folks are using "N" connectors. The only exception would be mobile 70 cm operation, and a barrel connection should not be necessary. Keith NM5G --Original Message-- F
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00314.html (10,468 bytes)

166. RE: [TowerTalk] CONNECTORS (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 09:13:28 -0500
BURY-FLEX Interesting name. Seems like some sort of oxymoron. Just thinking of other things that hams might bury, imagine a flexible ground rod, or water pipe, or electrical conduit, or Rohn SB45G Sh
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00335.html (9,372 bytes)

167. RE: [TowerTalk] Tower height increments (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:10:08 -0500
You would have a slightly lower elevation angle. This may be desirable for those long-range DX contacts but it also means you will be slightly less effective in stateside contests. I currently have a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00517.html (10,211 bytes)

168. RE: [TowerTalk] Sabre model 600 log periodic info? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 09:50:36 -0500
A typical LPDA design gain is about 3 dBd down from a typical 3 element Yagi, and almost 2 dBd down from a typical 2 element Yagi. The tradeoff, as you have indicated, is a nice flat VSWR over the en
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00520.html (9,777 bytes)

169. RE: [TowerTalk] Array Solutions (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 10:02:46 -0500
Having recently taken delivery of two ICE 419A combo bandpass filters ordered through Array Solutions for use in a DXpedition next month, I am looking for any input on the best way to implement these
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00521.html (10,302 bytes)

170. RE: [TowerTalk] Array Solutions (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 15:41:43 -0500
Thanks to all who offered advice. Looks like these filters should do a good job for our two-transceiver operation as VP8WWW in the Falklands. Power limit there is 150 watts so amplifiers will not be
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00529.html (13,599 bytes)

171. RE: [TowerTalk] replacing relay (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:14:44 -0500
I have a Paladin solder sucker. It is far more effective than any other method I have used, including the wicking braid. But, the easiest method may be a heat gun. It works well for circuit boards th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00542.html (10,095 bytes)

172. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:31:57 -0500
I use pipe. Each pipe is buried about 5 feet with a few inches of gravel at the bottom and about 4 yards of concrete. A friend who is also a CE for the county came by to see the installation just aft
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00545.html (10,623 bytes)

173. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:22:34 -0500
Interesting point. The block that is underground is approximately 3 feet wide and 5 feet long (in direction of guy) if memory serves. Anybody on this list that can figure the lateral force required t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00548.html (14,170 bytes)

174. RE: [TowerTalk] elevated anchor guy points (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 18:17:40 -0500
Just went out to measure the top, which took a bit of digging as it is about 6 inches below ground level. Looks to be 4 feet by 5 feet by 5 1/2 feet deep. Soil is sandy loam to 3 feet, then iron ore
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00570.html (9,881 bytes)

175. RE: [TowerTalk] re: Elevated guy posts (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 20:55:38 -0500
Just went outside and measured one of my pipes. It is 4 1/2 inch OD, 1/4 inch wall. It is galvanized and filled with concrete. These were installed in 1999. There are 4 guys installed. They have held
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00575.html (10,052 bytes)

176. RE: [TowerTalk] re: Elevated guy posts (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 11:40:05 -0500
I think this pipe is fairly common in the oil and gas distribution business (short haul). I drew up the design on a piece of paper and gave it to the welder. He used 1/4 inch steel plate for the guy
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00636.html (13,309 bytes)

177. RE: [TowerTalk] ground radials under slopers? (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:57:10 -0500
I would say not al all effective. To my knowledge a radial system is used as the second half of a vertical 1/4 wave radiator (Marconi antenna). Keith NM5G I have sloping 80 meter dipoles of a 90' tow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00689.html (8,343 bytes)

178. RE: [TowerTalk] Mounting a 4x4 in concrete (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:22:16 -0500
Higher is better. The current elevation (18 feet) is probably sufficient for operation on 20 meters. Moving up to 36 feet will improve operation on 40 meters significantly. I like to have a dipole up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00728.html (10,919 bytes)

179. RE: [TowerTalk] Mounting a 4x4 in concrete (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 08:27:39 -0500
My barn is built on 4X6 20-foot Wolmanized pine posts set in concrete to a depth of 4 feet. It was erected in 1977. There is no evidence of rot. Keith NM5G I think setting timber in concrete is a bad
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00729.html (11,900 bytes)

180. RE: [TowerTalk] Cable TV hardline question (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Dutson" <kjdutson@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 11:13:54 -0500
The difference in the two is likely power handling and loss rating. The bigger size probably has a larger center conductor, better dielectric material and shielding, which normally gets the higher ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2004-10/msg00786.html (11,721 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu