Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:knormoyle@surfnetusa.com: 125 ]

Total 125 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Have we been wasting our money? (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2010 21:50:09 -0700
"It seems pretty obvious he was poking fun at an antenna that in all reality is essentially a coil-loaded baseball bat." The antenna is a copycat of the predator 10k The predator 10k, is approx 79 3/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00283.html (10,693 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] need advice on 9/16 or 5/8 Rope, not for dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:12:00 -0700 (PDT)
I think when people say they need a 9/16" rope for 200 lb loads, something seems wrong. If you need to handle the rope, it might be cheaper to buy a rope ascender (or two) to provide grip/pull on the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00341.html (8,991 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] need advice on 9/16 or 5/8 Rope, not for dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:14:22 -0700
well, I would reinforce my opinion then. If you think humans grabbing a 9/16" rope with their hands in front of them, maybe wearing gloves, meets the safety requirements you described ($100k damage)
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-06/msg00343.html (10,703 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Beta match adjustment (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 21:51:27 -0700
Scott said "I built a 40m 2 element Yagi. Physical detail on the antenna can be shared if pertinent. It plays well, but I would like to utilize a DXE beta match to see if I could improve the match. I
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00325.html (10,403 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] Beta match adjustment (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 02:19:21 -0700
K3LR recommended the W6NL moxons. Yeah I had looked at the various W6NL variations, and decided against them. In the end, I'm not convinced the extra aluminum is worth it, compared to a regular moxon
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00328.html (9,566 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] 50 ohm yagis (40M2L) ? (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 09:43:46 -0700
40M 2L 50 ohm impedance? with reasonable gain/f/b/swr bandwidth? I don't think so, or I couldn't do it (with my boom length and full length elements) Am I missing something? Actually I did create one
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00334.html (9,283 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] 50 ohm yagis (40M2L) ? (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 12:23:47 -0700
Don K5AQ to me mentioned the 50 ohm yagis in the ARRL antenna book. . I have 20th ed so. let's see. oh yeah Don's right..I guess I misremembered stuff.. But let's look at the performance: using the A
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00341.html (9,212 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] 50 ohm yagis (40M2L) ? (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2010 16:17:13 -0700
Don pointed out a mistake in what I said... Correcting something I said about the ARRL antenna book 40M2L. I said something wrong about it's swr bandwidth, but it confirms what I'm saying anyhow. I m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-07/msg00357.html (11,085 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] Divining rods (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:44:28 -0700
In all of these posts, there's an implicit claim that the location of the desired object is fully random. It's not, right? For instance, in the pvc case below, the installer has probably seen the ful
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00680.html (10,510 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Divining rods (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 19:16:46 -0700
There has been nothing presented that says the results of divining are better than the results of random hole drilling for a given location. If 80% of random holes drilled hit water, than anyone can
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-08/msg00696.html (16,078 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] seismoelectrics, EM, dipoles (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
I was doing some googling. This post does involve EM waves and dipoles, so is on-topic :). However there's numbers and antennas, so it may be OT. There's an interesting thing that people are research
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00039.html (8,499 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Arrow customer service (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 00:15:07 -0700
for what it's worth: I ordered a number of 2.4" toroids from Arrow, type 31 and 43. They packed ten to a custom foam sheet with holes cut to size the toroids..with foam under and over that, then with
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00327.html (12,221 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 18:19:44 -0700
If you're 55+, using a ladder seems to have a lot of risk. http://apha.confex.com/apha/135am/recordingredirect.cgi/id/17261 (you can click on a pdf link there) in this study: (workplace fatalies) Rel
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00504.html (9,345 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] ladders (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2010 19:51:09 -0700
my point is that a fixation on height having a correlation to risk is wrong. There are many things that introduce risk when you're in a possible fall situation. Height doesn't change the risk (once y
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00508.html (9,155 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] tower climbing death rates, plus osha 2006 tie off regs (I doubt people follow them) (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:43:50 -0700
did some more googling ranking death rate by fatality rate in 2006 Tower climbing leads the pack: (per worker) http://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=SPEECHES&p_id=1267 <http:/
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00524.html (9,432 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Climbing (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 20:54:40 -0700
My tower climbing is modest. Most of my experience comes from rock climbing. In the rock climbing world, there is a lot of information sharing, accidents, what works, what doesn't etc. There's very l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00532.html (9,952 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] securing loose element ends (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:25:53 -0700
I like rivets. But I think there's a different issue here. Rivets are nice for telescoping straight tubes that fit nicely within each other. And in fact I just ordered a bunch of Avex rivets from Ai
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00601.html (9,258 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] Idiom Press RotorCard DXA (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:02:59 -0700
I have an Idiom Press card for Yaesu G-1000 dxa. Works great. but you got me thinking about what are current alternatives, feature wise. (without replacing the whole controller) (I have two other con
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-09/msg00695.html (7,462 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] Cushcraft Parts from MFJ (score: 1)
Author: "knormoyle@surfnetusa.com" <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 15:04:04 -0800
Talking about MFJ-259B reminds me of my recent experience which I was happy with. I had killed my MFJ-259B somehow. Possibly RF overload on the input. Don't know. Came up with 0 Mhz no matter what. R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00383.html (9,185 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Tuners (score: 1)
Author: Kevin Normoyle <knormoyle@surfnetusa.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2010 01:52:32 -0800
Good ARRL article on tuning t-network tuners http://www.arrl.org/files/file/Technology/tis/info/pdf/9501046.pdf I was going to say, based on my limited experience, than you shouldn't sweat the L vs C
/archives//html/Towertalk/2010-11/msg00455.html (9,406 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu