Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:kr7x@comcast.net: 82 ]

Total 82 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] Area (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 21:08:48 +0000
Clay: Hit return too fast. Add in the 2 legs for the same panel distance. The areas are the diameter of the item times the length (exposed area). Hank _______________________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00547.html (6,337 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] new tower (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 14:53:20 -0700
Whoa! This is getting a bit thick now. I can assure you that this is not the cause of any power under a base plate. Not to keep this thread going but it is getting into the realm of extremely bad sci
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-07/msg00641.html (11,117 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Base bolt depth in existing concrete (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 09:52:46 -0700
Chris and others Google "Hilti" or "Powers Fasteners" you will find all the information you need on epoxy adhesive bolts or anchors. Epoxy bolts are the worst thing you can use in a situation where t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00041.html (9,612 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Base bolt depth in existing concrete (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 23:00:13 -0700
Steve: Go to www dot us dot hilti dot com Then "products" Then "adhesive & mechanical anchoring" Go to www dot powers dot com Then "mechanical anchors" or "adhesives & foam" The info is there. Hank /
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00090.html (9,677 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] exothermic welding suppliers (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 15:00:51 +0000
TT: Sorry for the bandwidth but a short response to a query To the gentleman who asked me about suppliers of exothermic welding supplies; I lost your e-mail but the following is a list of the supplie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00433.html (7,309 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Vibrator for 2x2x4 hole? (score: 1)
Author: "Hank Lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:32:18 -0700
Bob and TT: What you need to do is have the engineer specify and design for less than 3000 psi. The special inspection section of the CBC ( California Building Code) (essentially the 1997 UBC) doesn'
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00458.html (11,216 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Our club's (W8UM) new tower and antennas (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 20:17:16 +0000
Carl and TT: The dead load of the tower section for the 40' is a minor factor in this case. The max vertical load comes from the vertical guy force vectors not the weight of the tower in this case. 4
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-08/msg00496.html (12,451 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] exploding foundations (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 16:45:35 +0000
Jim / Paul / Doug and list: I have been holding back from responding to this thread as I have responded to this idea in the past, but I just couldn't hold back any more. The exploding concrete concep
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-09/msg00493.html (12,181 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] BASE REBAR and Lightning (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 18:08:55 +0000
List: The "Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete" ACI-318-05 section 7.7.1 - Cast-in-place concrete (nonprestressed) states "The following minimum concrete cover shall be provided for re
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00132.html (12,945 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete with air. (score: 1)
Author: kr7x@comcast.net
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:18:12 +0000
Julio: What they are suggesting is higher strength concrete 25Mpa which is about 3600 psi. The air is air entrainment. 5% is the value you should look for. This will improve the conrete's durability
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-10/msg00217.html (7,939 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Equivalent wind load to square ft (score: 1)
Author: "henry.lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 17:54:16 +0000 (UTC)
Jim/Steve etal: You forget that this is just the air mass density force at a velocity. There are modifiers beyond Cd (drag/shape) that need to be taken into account which modify the force due to heig
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-10/msg00437.html (11,302 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] HDBX-48 figures for 90 mph zone (score: 1)
Author: "henry.lonberg" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 18:53:25 +0000 (UTC)
Mike etal: All this talk got me curious about the loading capacity of the 48' HDBX. When I was engineering the tower installation for K9CT's new station, he requested using 64' BX towers for the 80m
/archives//html/Towertalk/2011-12/msg00195.html (14,959 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchor bolts for LM470 (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 09:12:41 -0700
Glen: The alloy call out is actually ASTM F1554 Gr 55. These are carbon steel anchor rods (newer terminology) with 55,000 psi yield strength. There is no need and it is not recommended by American Co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00244.html (9,269 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchor bolts for LM470 (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:26:28 -0700
Steve: Yes you are correct wrt the double nut. I also callout for the threads to be spoiled below the bottom of the lower nut. Belt and suspender philosophy. Foundations are relatively less expensive
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00255.html (9,595 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Anchor bolts for LM470 (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 11:29:51 -0700
Rick: Not really the crushing starts to be a factor when you approach a right angle (90deg bend). Regards Lonberg Design Group, Ltd. H. S. Lonberg, P.E.,S.E. / KR7X Principal Again, remember, I had a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-04/msg00256.html (9,710 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 16:02:46 -0700
Jerry: Where on the current Universal Tower web site did you find the 21sf at 110mph rating for the HD-21-50 rating? All they say there is if your antenna is xx SF go down the list that has the same
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00105.html (9,938 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Aluminum Towers (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2012 17:41:24 -0700
Mario: That is nice but all your reference document links say 80mph, 90 mph etc. but do not say what exposure, whether the wind velocity is fastest mile or 3 sec gust or what loading specification th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00110.html (12,616 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] tower permit for Portland OR (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:46:56 -0700
Steve: That was Mark's (W7ZB) tower installation. I got the welders AWS certificates from Rohn as part of the permit application. It was the city of Beaverton and they did not back down until an ARRL
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-08/msg00302.html (9,967 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] AN Wireless tower (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 18:45:37 -0700
In that case you had better tell all those concrete dams that have been built that they should not be holding back those reservoirs as they do. Regards Lonberg Design Group, Ltd. H. Lonberg, P.E.,S.E
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00296.html (9,617 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] AN Wireless tower (score: 1)
Author: "KR7X" <kr7x@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 21:30:02 -0700
Dave: The comment was meant to make you think about what you purport to say is true when it is not, in the context you use. Concrete does indeed have pores and they are very small in relationship to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2012-09/msg00299.html (15,044 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu