Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:larryk7sv@comcast.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [TowerTalk] CURIOUS EFFECT AFTER INCREASING NUMBER OF RADIALS UNDER160M TEE (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <larryk7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 07:11:07 -0500
At NR4M we haven't gotten around to getting a more permanent 160M antenna in place, so we've been using a sloping wire vertical or most recently a TEE. There is a catenary between the 120 foot 15M to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-11/msg00395.html (8,125 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Rohn 45/55/65 vs. AB-105 or Stainless 25? (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <larryk7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:37:02 -0500
Rob, I've spent a lot of time on 25, 45, 55 and AB105. I find working on Rohn tower to be much easier than working on 105 largely due to the horizontal braces on all three sides of the Rohn all the w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-02/msg00415.html (7,542 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] ANTENNA HEIGHT (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Schimelpfenig" <larryk7sv@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2008 11:11:05 -0400
I had a KT34XA at 55 ft with poplars and pines extending ten to twenty feet above it and all around it. Worked great. I increased the tower by another 10 feet and it worked even better. I attribute t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-03/msg00157.html (6,904 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu