Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lists@subich.com: 534 ]

Total 534 documents matching your query.

281. Re: [TowerTalk] modeling compare: 80M, 2EL vs 4SQ (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 15:49:27 -0400
It really depends on the degree of screening provided by the elevated radials and the distance in wavelengths the elevated radials are above the ground. If the screening is minimal (as is the case wi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00193.html (9,433 bytes)

282. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 16:06:38 -0400
Worth noting when evaluating the N2IC report is that the C31XR has an effective boom length of 25 feet on 20 meters, 22 feet on 15 meters, and 25 feet on 10 meters. The C31XR compares favorably with,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00060.html (11,007 bytes)

283. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2015 17:42:32 -0400
Here are some model comparisons for various SteppIR models vs. other "multi-monoband" yagis done at various times several (8 - 10) years ago: Here is a comparison of the three and four element SteppI
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00064.html (13,405 bytes)

284. Re: [TowerTalk] Modelling SteppIR Elements (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 16:35:21 -0400
Unless you can derive an appropriate dielectric factor for the tubes used in your SteppIR, the element lengths derived from any modeling program will be too long. Years ago K7IR told me they worked
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00074.html (8,808 bytes)

285. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 18:27:27 -0400
I'm happy with my 4L but it would be nice to have some more smoke. What might be interesting are some longer boom more limited band combinations, with higher performance e.g. 6 L on 15/12/10 or 5 L
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00090.html (9,036 bytes)

286. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 10:18:41 -0400
If you are talking about a *new* antenna your choices are pretty much limited to the Cushcraft A3S and the HyGain TH-3MK4, EXP-14. If you push the price point a bit, you can add the HyGain TH-5MK2 ($
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00195.html (16,012 bytes)

287. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 12:13:45 -0400
*ANY* horizontally polarized antenna will have similar vertical take off angles at similar heights. The vertical pattern is a simple matter of beam formation between the antenna and its "image". One
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00202.html (10,206 bytes)

288. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 15:24:27 -0400
On 2015-04-12 2:56 PM, David Blake via TowerTalk wrote: and I on the other hand would suggest you look 1st for a used Mosley. With only Mosley yagi's I am #1 Honor Roll (all 340 DXCCs) and total DXCC
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00207.html (9,266 bytes)

289. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 21:57:17 -0400
No Doug, your "facts" are opinions and wishes. Facts are backed up by objective proof - you have none. In objective head to head tests the Mosley antennas are repeatedly worst in class. That's not to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00221.html (10,353 bytes)

290. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 08:26:21 -0400
Brian, See: http://www.optibeam.info/index.php?article_id=100&clang=1 Weight: 15 kg Windload: 3.2 ft^2 Price: 1279 EUR (includes 19% VAT) - Array Solutions price will vary 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2015-0
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00245.html (15,856 bytes)

291. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:07:07 -0400
The main issue with the Mosley PRO antennas we tested was on 10 meters where gain and pattern were definitely below spec. Stan, Ward obviously failed to reread his document before making that statem
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00248.html (10,200 bytes)

292. Re: [TowerTalk] trap antenna performance (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:02:25 -0400
And the difference need not all be dissipation. Any antenna with "gain" concentrates its radiation in the desired direction(s) by "stealing" it from other directions. Not necessarily. At 1500 W from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00295.html (8,876 bytes)

293. Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 23:12:12 -0400
Hy-Gain TH-3MK4 $499 from www.Hy-gain.com or $469 from www.dxengineering.com. While the multi-monoband antennas are undoubtedly better performers than the older trapped tribanders, the Hy-Gain design
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00317.html (10,895 bytes)

294. Re: [TowerTalk] Hauling hardline into a 4 inch cable duct (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:51:14 -0400
I think the rule of thumb is to use a conduit twice the diameter of the cables. I remember having one heck of a time pulling two 7/8" hardlines through a 4" conduit for a C-band satellite installatio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00402.html (9,284 bytes)

295. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 11:43:11 -0400
Mosley's TA series antennas are not balanced feed points. They strap one side of the driven element to the boom - that severely unbalances the antenna *even if one uses a balun or choke*. Depending o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00467.html (9,762 bytes)

296. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:02:33 -0400
73, ... Joe, W4TV 73, Roger Mosley's TA series antennas are not balanced feed points. They strap one side of the driven element to the boom - that severely unbalances the antenna *even if one uses a
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00469.html (11,199 bytes)

297. Re: [TowerTalk] antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 12:53:52 -0400
The Classic 33 and Classic 36 (along with the newer CL-33WARC and CL-39M) are a completely different design. The feed point is "balanced capacitive" with no ground strap like the MP, TA and PRO serie
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00471.html (11,928 bytes)

298. Re: [TowerTalk] choke / balun design needed (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:33:17 -0400
Gerald, they typical solution is to cascade a 4:1 current balun *and* a high choking impedance common mode choke. The problem is maintaining the high impedance across the entire operating range of th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00635.html (10,669 bytes)

299. Re: [TowerTalk] G5RV vs 40M dipole (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 17:49:19 -0400
Absolutely! If the signal is at the noise level, 1.2 dB can make the difference between no QSO and easy copy. 73, ... Joe, W4TV Best regards - Brian Carling AF4K Crystals Co. 117 Sterling Pine St. Sa
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00642.html (10,693 bytes)

300. Re: [TowerTalk] Rohn AS25G inside a 25G tower (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Date: Sun, 10 May 2015 09:42:52 -0400
The Rohn 25AG2 section has a 2' 9" length of 2.25" OD x 2.06" ID tubing for a "nose". The only place the AS25AG accessory shelf will fit is in the 1' 3 3/4" open space right below the top tube with t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00097.html (37,484 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu