Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:lwloen@gmail.com: 128 ]

Total 128 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] What rotor should I use (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 10:15:58 -0700
What windload and weight do you want on top of this tower? This should be mostly a matter of looking up the specs and picking from the "qualified" if you have those answers. I'm not even sure which "
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00385.html (9,238 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Going for it! (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:50:00 -0700
You will almost certainly also have a well-levelled tower. That's worth something, too. My contractor gave me a dead level base for my 72 footer, a fact I appreciate every day. Larry Wo0Z ___________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00431.html (9,075 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] Very new to this (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 07:54:53 -0700
I agree with N4ZR here. Find out what is required, especially of the base. It isn't just something to keep the tower from sliding around. It is the _foundation_ of the whole tower. The house bracket
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00022.html (14,262 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] Lightning protection and a close one (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:13:02 -0700
In Arizona, it is positively routine for me to see cloud to ground strikes where there is no rain. Now, these do drop directly from clouds, but still, they are high enough up that (in Minnesota, at l
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00109.html (8,007 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] cascading RCS-12 (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:03:58 -0700
Not yet, but I plan to for my remote operation. I haven't done it, but it appears to be easy to replace the control boxes on units like this with relays which, in turn, trigger the RF relays in the s
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-07/msg00260.html (10,107 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2013 09:03:26 -0700
I guess all those DXpedition shacks need to shut down, then. I would regard that as a great pity. DXing has to have people who aren't stateside or who live at least part time in places few to no oper
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00111.html (11,993 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2013 13:23:55 -0700
over on all of my awards. Nice for you. Please don't impose this rule on the rest of us. Many operating awards are, realistically, life time achievements and are meant to be. A lot of us do _not_ mov
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00140.html (11,767 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Ham Radio (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 08:12:54 -0700
My local club's repeater suggests otherwise. If you're the FCC, you have to consider more than HF. How is a typical repeater, put up by ham radio club XXX, different than this situation? For many clu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00173.html (11,908 bytes)

69. Re: [TowerTalk] cable entry to new shack (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 15:37:31 -0700
A small thing. Usually, in arrangements like this, there is a 90 degree angle to be negotiated. In my current shack, I actually have two accesses. I did 4 inch conduit for both so there is comfortabl
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00276.html (10,476 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Digging a 5'x5'x7' hole in sandy soil (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 20:51:05 -0700
Hire a competent contractor. Here in Arizona's Sonoran Desert, we have exactly this problem (except they want a 5x5x8 foot hole). A good contractor can meet all of these requirements, including allow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00339.html (9,923 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] Thoughts on Tower lifting cable broken strands (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 08:33:00 -0700
It's cheaper, especially as there is a finite chance that "cheaper" here also means "no loss of life, especially your own". There's no law that says you aren't on or under the tower when the cable sn
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00544.html (9,342 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Counterpoise / raised ground radial adjustment method (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 08:38:05 -0700
I don't know about 160, but don't disparage 30 foot radials for 80 and 40 (and 30) on an HF2V in particular. I was restricted to that, put down 64 radials, and had great result in Minnesota (average
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-08/msg00597.html (10,509 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Example Faraday Cage for Lightning (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 05:09:38 -0700
Jim, what's going on in that first picture and the video "next" to it? It looks like a comely young woman, dressed as a magician's assistant, is taking the entire "lightning" discharge through her fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-09/msg00303.html (10,057 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] Fwd: Thoughts on towers suitable for my difficult location? (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 13:39:55 -0700
(Forward to the whole group). I agree with you, Jim, but to play devil's advocate a bit, maybe you plan for something that basically doesn't survive. Suppose you have a TV push up mast style design t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00313.html (11,460 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 08:37:18 -0700
I'm extremely happy with my Force 12 6BA. If you drop off the 40 meter part of it, you still have a crackerjack antenna, I suppose. That would be the XR 5 (I have no experience on the XR 5 without th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00325.html (11,757 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Tower and antenna decisions (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 09:23:28 -0700
I hear you. And contesters with stacked arrays agree with you. But, I remain suspicious that, on average, height wins out. This situation, after all, has one individual picking between one height or
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00328.html (9,604 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] Question on Antenna Manufacturers (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 15:16:53 -0700
I got a used KT-36XA and I believe it is still for sale. See: http://www.m2inc.com/index.php?ax=amateur&pg=40 WO7R _______________________________________________ ____________________________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00433.html (11,668 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] COAX on CRANKUP-how to hang (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 09:55:21 -0700
I use standoffs and, at least in the Sonoran dessert, they are at least "useful" if not "necessary". Since I usually bring my tower down "a ways" from the top when not there, there's slack cable arou
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-10/msg00469.html (11,130 bytes)

79. Re: [TowerTalk] concrete (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:10:14 -0700
My US Tower first advised 90 days, but the eventually relented and told me 28. I think I waited six to eight weeks; don't remember now. Remember, though, that none of us are structural engineers. You
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00007.html (10,377 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] Concrete (score: 1)
Author: Larry Loen <lwloen@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 14:35:24 -0700
I would go further and say "don't be in a hurry". You're going to live with that tower for a lot of years. What's a couple more days? You're going to miss CQ WW CW whatever you do, so I can't think o
/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-11/msg00013.html (9,072 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu