- 1. [TowerTalk] Stub mast loading and forces (score: 1)
- Author: Robert M0RCX <m6bfd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 17:35:01 +0100
- Hello I am new to the forum and thank you for your acceptance into the group. There have been many discussions on wind loading to mast supported antennas but I was wondering if anyone has calculated
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00335.html (8,122 bytes)
- 2. Re: [TowerTalk] Stub mast loading and forces (score: 1)
- Author: MORCX <m6bfd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 21:35:34 +0100
- Hello John, Thanks for your reply. I can confirm when the tower is luffed over it is at minimum height plus approx 6 foot and no more. This is what has caused us to call a halt to the work and conduc
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00337.html (13,492 bytes)
- 3. Re: [TowerTalk] tilt tower (score: 1)
- Author: Robert M0RCX <m6bfd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:21:16 +0100
- Hi Brian Yes it does appear to be of good value. We all take the forces for granted but to work safely need to stop and think. This is why the club called a halt to work and got out the slide rule. W
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00343.html (10,528 bytes)
- 4. [TowerTalk] Unsubscribe (score: 1)
- Author: Robert M0RCX <m6bfd@yahoo.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2013 19:22:25 +0100
- Unsubscribe Robert Rawson M0RCX North Wakefield Radio Club _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.
- /archives//html/Towertalk/2013-06/msg00243.html (24,217 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu