Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:maflukey@gmail.com: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

21. [TowerTalk] FW: Balun/Choke power ratings (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 21:30:35 -0500
IMHO - W2FMI's book on baluns (& ununs) offers much insight on the subject of power ratings associated with different Balun construction - highly recommended reading. One may also find some good info
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-04/msg00608.html (9,392 bytes)

22. [TowerTalk] FW: In Shack Tuner Vs. Remote Tuner for Multi-Band Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 01:01:15 -0500
Another simple and effective option is to put the tuner in the shack and feed the antenna with ladder line through a balun. Matt KM5VI --Original Message-- From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@c
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00035.html (10,303 bytes)

23. [TowerTalk] FW: FW: In Shack Tuner Vs. Remote Tuner for Multi-Band Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 23:56:59 -0500
bands? I suspect that the patterns can get somewhat chaotic on the upper HF bands with say an 80 through 10 meter doublet? Hi Tony, In a multi-band doublet, the physical length of the antenna relati
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00088.html (11,871 bytes)

24. [TowerTalk] FW: In Shack Tuner Vs. Remote Tuner for Multi-Band Antennas (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 04:19:28 -0500
Hi Tom, Thanks for your comments & I agree with you that all antennas are certainly compromises of various parameters and no one antenna can do it all - certainly one of the mantras of our hobby. I r
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00097.html (12,951 bytes)

25. [TowerTalk] FW: 1. Ferrite, 2. Polyphasers (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 21:42:06 -0500
1. Can you clarify that you mean to wind an RF choke on the FT-240-? core using magnet wire? Just speculating here, but since you mention Polyphaser in the same post... are you wanting to create an R
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00112.html (8,862 bytes)

26. [TowerTalk] FW: T2X problem (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 17:24:38 -0500
Suggest to check the wiring inside the rotor connected to terminal #1 (ground wire). The potentiometer and the motor both use this common ground connection to complete their circuits. The brake circu
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00138.html (7,959 bytes)

27. [TowerTalk] Relay Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 16:41:13 -0500
I would appreciate recommendations for general purpose SPDT relays that can be used reliably for RF antenna switching duty - it is not a hot switching application. I am aware that the DC & 60hz AC ra
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00178.html (6,690 bytes)

28. [TowerTalk] FW: Relay Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 21:01:15 -0500
Only resonant & matched antennas these days John... thanks for your help. Matt There are so many inexpensive relays that will work for RF antenna switching, assuming that you don't have excess voltag
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00190.html (8,260 bytes)

29. [Amps] Relay Recommendations (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 21:09:07 -0500
Just wanted to says thanks to all who responded with information, recommendations, and advice on relays. Much appreciated! Matt KM5VI _______________________________________________ Amps mailing list
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00204.html (6,603 bytes)

30. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 21:11:42 -0500
Hi Mike, I can't imagine that a few 100 feet of extra length would make any discernable difference in signal loss - especially on low bands. There are 1000 ft feed lines (RG-6) on some of my Beverage
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00273.html (10,171 bytes)

31. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 21:57:00 -0500
In the interest of sharing - poor signal strength issues with Beverages are most likely attributable to the balun and/or feed system rather than feed line losses. Low SWR is not an indication of high
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00274.html (12,947 bytes)

32. [TowerTalk] FW: Replacement crank up motor (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 22:19:28 -0500
Hi Julio, Pretty much any standard, general purpose TEFC (totally enclosed fan cooled) NEMA frame 56 motor of the same RPM & fractional HP should work fine. If you don't have the original I think the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00275.html (8,423 bytes)

33. [TowerTalk] FW: FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:42:21 -0500
Thanks Pat - just wanted to confirm that I used the wrong term - NOT autotransformer, but isolation transformer.... Matt Google autotransformer and see something like: /Auto Transformer/is a kind of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00278.html (7,591 bytes)

34. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage phasing (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 17:45:53 -0500
Hi Hans, For the purpose of adjustable nulling, take a look at the NCC-1 : http://www.dxengineering.com/search/department/antennas/section/receive-ante nnas-and-arrays/product-line/dx-engineering-ncc
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00284.html (7,856 bytes)

35. [TowerTalk] FW: Hy-Gain Rotor Control Boxes (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 22:58:25 -0500
Hi Jim, To my knowledge... Series 1 & 2 control boxes for the early Ham-M produced 1957-1959 are not compatible with any of the later model rotors. Series 3, 4, and early series 5 boxes for the Ham-M
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00289.html (8,670 bytes)

36. [TowerTalk] FW: Beverage Layout Problem (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 10:54:50 -0500
Hi Jim, Do you have any experience or knowledge you can share about how well the shielding performs or compares at HF for double & triple shielded RG-6 & RG-11 cables? These (Commscope brand) ) have
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00313.html (9,004 bytes)

37. [TowerTalk] FW: Rotor control cable connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 22:53:27 -0500
Hi Patrick, Just another take on the chronic problem with the older terminal block design that you mention... My solution was to replace the terminal strip with a blank-off plate through which I pass
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00332.html (9,410 bytes)

38. [TowerTalk] FW: DXE TFS4-160 circuit (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 00:13:16 -0500
Hi Jorge, The component ID's should be marked on the circuit board. C1 & T90 (2 each in bridge configuration) comprise a hybrid quadrature bridge circuit providing +/- 45 degree phase shift at resona
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00430.html (9,334 bytes)

39. [TowerTalk] FW: Seeking opinions on Wire antennas.. (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 21:37:26 -0500
Hi Gerry, I used a 6 element Sterba 10m some years ago... still have it in storage for that matter. It is a relatively easy antenna to build and Its performance arguably rivals a mono-bander - for fi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-05/msg00483.html (9,260 bytes)

40. [TowerTalk] FW: Taking down a tri-ex LM354 (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:16:09 -0500
Just a suggestion, but you may want to look at renting a shooting boom forklift. It is much cheaper than a crane and pretty simple to operate. Not only will it safely lower the tower but also comes i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-06/msg00117.html (9,189 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu