Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:maflukey@gmail.com: 219 ]

Total 219 documents matching your query.

61. [TowerTalk] FW: Is A Tower Weaker in Some Directions? (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 03:19:20 -0500
Gene, Not flaming, but this would be magic. Any wind loading with a component normal to the axis of the cable increases its tension. Lest Newton roll over in his grave, that tension imparts reaction
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00051.html (12,370 bytes)

62. [TowerTalk] FW: Difference in TailTwister and Ham 4 torque values (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 05:36:41 -0500
starting/running torque between the Ham 4 and TailTwister? Ray, There is no difference in torque output between the Ham IV and the Tail Twister. Both use the same drive motor and running gear ratios
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00250.html (8,077 bytes)

63. [TowerTalk] FW: FW: Difference in TailTwister and Ham 4 torque values (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:29:29 -0500
Steve, I disagree. The differences in torque ratings which were published were likely based on the strength of the ring gear, which was upgraded in the past to the heat treated material. To the best
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-10/msg00255.html (8,454 bytes)

64. [TowerTalk] FW: Take off angle of yagi vs a wire antenna at about 30' (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 08:55:30 -0600
Hi David, A dipole in the optimum direction at about 85' will produce similar transmitted low angle ERP as your Mosley at 30', but should provide some advantage in hearing low angle signals. I once h
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-11/msg00062.html (9,506 bytes)

65. [TowerTalk] FW: Dipole gain? (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2014 21:14:15 -0600
A dipole in free space can be mathematically shown to have a theoretical far-field gain of 2.14 dB over an isotropic radiator. Matt KM5VI Even if this is not the "right" forum i still think this is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00069.html (8,302 bytes)

66. [TowerTalk] FW: Trap ID (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2014 22:24:07 -0600
Mosley TA33 trap explanation: To the best of my knowledge, this is how it works... Inside the trap there are coils on each end. The inner element inserts into coil form such that the aluminum trap co
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00089.html (9,818 bytes)

67. [TowerTalk] FW: Single tower and 3 monoband yagis -"Christmas three" (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 17:56:30 -0600
Best to model it first... saves time & heartache. Matt KM5VI _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00134.html (8,745 bytes)

68. [TowerTalk] FW: Adding 160 to an 80M dipole? (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:51:00 -0600
Coax traps are relatively easy to make. Check out ON7EQ's website for more info & links to design software. Hope this helps. Matt KM5VI Hi all, The ARRL 160 contest got me interested in 160. I would
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00222.html (8,071 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] FW: [Bulk] Long shank U-Bolts (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 18:54:50 -0600
Try Bolt Depot - 3/8 dia lengths up to 4.625" in 18-8 SS. Matt KM5VI I have a similar problem - McMaster 3/8 and 1/2" hot dip galvanized u-bolts regular length are too short and extended length are t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2014-12/msg00423.html (9,192 bytes)

70. [TowerTalk] FW: Coax lengths for phasing a stack (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 7 Feb 2015 21:51:23 -0600
Hi Grant, What type of matching network are you using? Does it have BOP mode and if so, is BOP achieved via inverting un-un or external phase line? Generally speaking, the distance from the match to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00126.html (9,028 bytes)

71. [TowerTalk] FW: Coax lengths for phasing a stack (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 21:56:57 -0600
Spot on John. As the phase angle between a single stacked pair increases, the high angle lobe starts to grow, and the low angle lobe starts to deteriorate... but not at all in a linear manner - quite
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00149.html (11,038 bytes)

72. [TowerTalk] FW: Mosley Antenna Question (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 23:25:24 -0600
... some more Mosley bashing... 2014 ARRL DX (SOHP): 1.3M, 5th place regional, 3rd place in W5 2014 CQ WPX (TB/SE) : 4.9M, 2nd place USA, all-time prefix record holder for W5 in TB/SE 2014 CQ WWDX (S
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-02/msg00423.html (10,666 bytes)

73. [TowerTalk] FW: Use of 75 ohm coax (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 21:28:01 -0500
1/12 - 50/75 in series works fine. KM5VI I am using coax intended for Cable TV use. It's 75 ohms and i am using it exclusively with a tuner. I found this article which may be of interest. http://www.
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-03/msg00204.html (8,261 bytes)

74. [TowerTalk] FW: Near Field Lightning Damage (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2015 05:49:54 -0500
No one else has offered up anything so thought I would throw in my 2 cents worth... Draw out a 1-line schematic of your station equipment set-up. Show ALL of the wiring connections. Include all house
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00454.html (10,968 bytes)

75. [TowerTalk] FW: antenna choices for K4XS (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 23:21:42 -0500
Personal experience... TA33M will handle legal limit key down no problem. TA33JR will fry the drive element traps at 1kW RTTY, as a friend of mine unfortunately discovered some years ago. The JR will
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-04/msg00504.html (9,839 bytes)

76. [TowerTalk] FW: Tower height (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 18:46:44 -0500
Hi Mel, If you are serious about wanting to know, my suggestion is to model your site installation using HFTA, which comes with the latest ARRL Antenna Handbook. HFTA should be able to give you a goo
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00183.html (9,073 bytes)

77. [TowerTalk] FW: FW: Tower height (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 19:05:10 -0500
Thanks Paul for Good advice... I found Microdem rather cumbersome to install & set up and was not particularly intuitive to use... Matt FREE detailed terrain data available via download for most all
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00185.html (8,425 bytes)

78. [TowerTalk] FW: how do you model a hairpin match? (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2015 01:37:08 -0500
In addition to YW, using a shorted shunt with a Smith chart has also produced reasonably good predictions for me. About 450 ohm shunt impedance on the chart seems to work pretty close for 1/4 inch ro
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-05/msg00205.html (7,883 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] FW: units in HFTA (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 23:46:32 -0500
My experience with changing units in the options tab results in changing units for BOTH the terrain input and antenna elevations. I have also observed that the antenna heights displayed in the main w
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-06/msg00009.html (8,376 bytes)

80. [TowerTalk] FW: engineering help? Antenna weight for US Tower TX472 (score: 1)
Author: "Matt" <maflukey@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 23:27:56 -0500
Hi Doug, The lifting cable stress analysis is found on page 7 of the link that accompanied your message. The analysis shows the factors of safety in the cable tension as 15.2, 6.1, and 9.74 for secti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-06/msg00178.html (10,460 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu