Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:marsh@ka5m.net: 108 ]

Total 108 documents matching your query.

61. Re: [TowerTalk] Guy Posts Math (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 08:12:16 -0500
Fred, Depending on your soil, under recommended guy tension your guy post might start to "lean in" after a while. I had 60' of guyed Rohn 45G in service for about 23 years. The guy posts where 8" ID
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00170.html (10,869 bytes)

62. Re: [TowerTalk] Soldering Irons (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:51:24 -0500
Actually the Hobby Lobby 100W soldering iron sold for stained glass work does great, and is inexpensive. Just file the flat tip down on each side a bit so it will fit in the grove of a PL259 where th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-07/msg00288.html (12,634 bytes)

63. Re: [TowerTalk] How many tower sections i can install?? (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:23:37 -0500
Your English is much better than my Spanish. 14-foot guying radius is only 46% of 30-feet. Recommended guying radius is typically 80%. At 20-feet up a 14-foot guying radius is 70%. Can the base (roof
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00440.html (10,876 bytes)

64. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inverted V (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:12:31 -0500
For an 80M inverted V with the apex at 90 feet, ends 10 feet above ground, and an inside angle of about 90 degrees, EZNEC+ 6.0.6 calculates -3.47 dBi gain at a 15 degree takeoff angle. Moving the end
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00483.html (9,044 bytes)

65. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 22:15:54 -0500
Suppose the ends of the 80M inverted V were each raised to 90 feet - the height of the apex of the original inverted V. The apex angle would increase to 180 degrees and the antenna would be a flat-to
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00490.html (7,807 bytes)

66. Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter inv V (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2015 09:47:57 -0500
With a 90 foot high apex and the ends supported by 35-foor masts, it will be possible to maintain about a 90 degree enclosed angle, a good match, a close-to omni-directional pattern, and increased ga
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-08/msg00496.html (11,366 bytes)

67. Re: [TowerTalk] Basic Question about Antenna Height and Treetops (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2015 06:41:09 -0500
My 80M loaded vertical is about 10 feet from the closest pine tree. It starts at about 9 feet above ground and runs straight up to 70 feet. In the middle of the vertical element there is a small load
/archives//html/Towertalk/2015-10/msg00045.html (10,162 bytes)

68. Re: [TowerTalk] Participating in a contest for the sake of dx? (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 19:28:08 -0600
dw, Perhaps you are mistaken. I can only speak for myself, but I look forward to DX contests, especially CW contests, as a great opportunity to work new band / entities. If I operate S&P and show up
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00109.html (10,809 bytes)

69. [TowerTalk] OT: Alpha Amplifier Factory Repair (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 09:57:03 -0600
After 8 years of dependable service my Alpha 8100 stopped working. I sent it back to Alpha (www.rkrdesignsllc.com <http://www.rkrdesignsllc.com> ). They fixed the problem, installed the latest versio
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-02/msg00275.html (6,846 bytes)

70. Re: [TowerTalk] Doublet vs Yagi (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 20:01:15 -0600
Tony, At what distance did you compare the 2 antennas. If the doublet is a "flat-top", what do you mean by its "apex"? A 100 foot center fed dipole 30 feet above "average" ground on 20M will have 2 n
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-03/msg00029.html (9,332 bytes)

71. Re: [TowerTalk] BALUN revisited again (score: 1)
Author: "Marsh Stewart" <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:21:32 -0500
Patrick, You might start with a 1:1 "balun" which is a common mode choke. There is no impedance transformation. The purpose of the common mode choke is to prevent the outside of the coax shield from
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-04/msg00084.html (11,643 bytes)

72. Re: [TowerTalk] Right Angle Connectors (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 10:54:08 -0500
Well, Amphenol uses PTFE in their RF 83-1SP PL-259 Coaxial Connectors and RF 83-1AP UHF Right Angle Coaxial Adapters Amphenol RF 83-1SP PL-259 Coaxial Connectors "Tough PTFE dielectric insulation fur
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00147.html (9,430 bytes)

73. Re: [TowerTalk] Right Angle Connectors (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 14:16:05 -0500
Going to the horse's mouth: http://www.amphenolrf.com/083-1sp.html PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS Insulator Material PTFE The drawing below you reference was approved 6-30-2011. http://www.amphenolrf.com/dow
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00157.html (13,850 bytes)

74. Re: [TowerTalk] Right Angle Connectors (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 14:23:44 -0500
Looks like it is PTFE according to http://www.amphenolrf.com/083-1sp.html OK guys, I am confused. What is the insulation in the Amphenol 83-1SP ? What type of teflon is it ? Bob K6UJ ________________
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-05/msg00158.html (10,484 bytes)

75. Re: [TowerTalk] Loosening Al Tubing to Al Tubing (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 17:28:20 -0500
A few years back I was rebuilding an antenna that had been up since about 1989. Two pieces of telescoping aluminum tubing were corroded together and would not come apart. There was no way I was going
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-06/msg00159.html (10,559 bytes)

76. Re: [TowerTalk] Flaky dipole (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2016 09:35:01 -0500
Tim, What band is this happening on? All bands? Just one band? What power level are you running? I'd check out the 4:1 balun. Is it getting hot? Can you open it up and look at the windings? Marsh, KA
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-08/msg00008.html (9,624 bytes)

77. Re: [TowerTalk] DOS? (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 15:16:20 -0500
Hi Steve, My son James, KB5JXV, has 2 Masters Degrees in Computer Science, worked for several years as a programmer in Silicon Valley, and is currently teaching programming at 2 different colleges. H
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00093.html (8,453 bytes)

78. Re: [TowerTalk] DOS? (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2016 18:02:56 -0500
Thanks for your comments but way over my non-Windows-programmer head. Way back in the (DOS) day I programmed some in BASIC, QuickBASIC, C, and Assembly. I was fascinated with asynchronous serial comm
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-10/msg00101.html (9,905 bytes)

79. [TowerTalk] No Info In WL 12.11D BandMap Box After Windows 10 Update (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 07:57:51 -0600
Running Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit. I updated to WL 12.11D Friday afternoon and operated in the ARRL 160M CW Contest. WriteLog worked great - no problems. Saturday afternoon I turned the computer on and t
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00037.html (7,959 bytes)

80. Re: [TowerTalk] No Info In WL 12.11D BandMap Box After Windows 10 Update (score: 1)
Author: <marsh@ka5m.net>
Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2016 07:59:25 -0600
Oops - wrong reflector. (I haven't had my second cup of coffee yet.) Running Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit. I updated to WL 12.11D Friday afternoon and operated in the ARRL 160M CW Contest. WriteLog worked g
/archives//html/Towertalk/2016-12/msg00038.html (7,902 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu