Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mclarson@rcc.com: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [TowerTalk] Omni Directional Antenna on Tower (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 18:26:58 -0500
Bernie: From a coverage/pattern perspective, obviously top is the choice. To get an almost omni pattern side mounting would require 20 or more feet of sidearm, depending on size of the tower. A conce
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00129.html (8,704 bytes)

2. RE: [TowerTalk] Tower "DROP ZONE" or "DROP RADIUS" for Rohn 25G&Trylon Titan? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 14:52:27 -0500
John: Just a suggeation--perhaps you can inquire of the inspector on other towers built in his jurisdiction and ask to look at a copy of their application(s) so your engineer can get a better idea of
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-01/msg00445.html (9,531 bytes)

3. Re: [TowerTalk] Telrex (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 11:13:48 -0500
On Telrex, back in the 60's, the 8 element 2 meter antenna was the "standard". It was not too expensive--about $18. The competition was the 11 el CushCraft--same boom length and sligtly less gain. Th
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-03/msg00091.html (8,221 bytes)

4. Re: [TowerTalk] Positoners Calibration to True North (score: 1)
Author: "Michael J. Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 02:01:12 -0500
Sean: Watch out when using a magnetic compass. I found out the hard way that local conditions can affect the direction which the compass points. I was aiming a microwave antenna near Allentown PA and
/archives//html/Towertalk/2005-12/msg00044.html (11,437 bytes)

5. Re: [TowerTalk] Water tower omni (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:07:17 -0400
While I cannot offer much as to how a lower antenna will be protected from lightning, I can offer some suggestions on constructing an "around the tank" antenna. In this type of array, phasing of the
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-07/msg00131.html (10,034 bytes)

6. Re: [TowerTalk] And now for something completely different(TrueNorth) (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 10:26:44 -0400
One should also be warned that sometimes a magnetic compass is useless also due to declination anomalies. If one doesn't know about them, they can really screw one up! See inserted info below. Sighti
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-08/msg00973.html (11,565 bytes)

7. Re: [TowerTalk] LMR-400 vs. CommScope vs. Belden (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 18:27:25 -0400
Check out CommScope WBC 600 and Andrew CNT-600. The Andrew is a direct substitute, the CommScope is a bit different. Watch the power rating--CommScope is only 10.4 kW while the others are 40 kW!--Mik
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00056.html (7,839 bytes)

8. Re: [TowerTalk] coax (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2006 12:25:56 -0400
Craig: You are correct, of course. The rating I quoted was the "Peak Power" rating, and it was an attempt to add some levity to an otherwise dry discussion. My refusal to use "emoticons" causes these
/archives//html/Towertalk/2006-10/msg00078.html (8,903 bytes)

9. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:35:54 -0500
I always solder standard PL-259's. Must have done several hundred over the years, and only recall screwing up maybe half dozen. All types of cable, foam, Teflon, including RG-8, 213, 214, 58, 59, 8x,
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00078.html (10,354 bytes)

10. Re: [TowerTalk] Coax Connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 11:51:17 -0500
Motorola used it on 800 MHz equipment (Mobiles) also. Motorola loved them so much that they went in for the "mini-UHF" on mobiles and cell phones--the mobile kind.--Mike, WV2ZOW --Original Message--
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-01/msg00095.html (7,967 bytes)

11. Re: [TowerTalk] LM-400 Connectors (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:41:21 -0400
Bill: Not to be a wise guy, but PL-259s work just fine. You must be looking for Crimps, however. First, watch out for the imported "gold pin, silver plated Teflon" solder on PL-259 style connectors--
/archives//html/Towertalk/2007-04/msg00269.html (8,063 bytes)

12. Re: [TowerTalk] CDE AR-40 Oddity (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Clarson" <mclarson@rcc.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:24:24 -0400
Mark: First, let me say I am no expert on these units, but I have some familiarity and have brought some back to life. It sounds like you have an AR-22 unit, not an AR-40. Similar units, but the 22 u
/archives//html/Towertalk/2008-07/msg00404.html (9,585 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu