Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:mel@interlink.net: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Towertalk] Models (score: 1)
Author: Mel Martin" <mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 13:22:16 -0400
Finally bought some modeling software... EZNEC... and considering YO and AO... Does anyone have models developed for any of these: Hygain TH11, DB12/17 Optibeam antennas, or any other interlaced desi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2002-04/msg00524.html (6,986 bytes)

2. [TowerTalk] Homebrew Rotators (score: 1)
Author: Mel Martin" <mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Sat, 3 Nov 2001 08:25:05 -0500
Hey great idea. If I'm working a Parisien, I just swing the antenna until I spot the Eiffel Tower... This newsgroup isn't merely educational... it's entertaining!!! List Sponsored by AN Wireless: AN
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-11/msg00050.html (8,421 bytes)

3. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 08:53:57 -0400
I don't... they deserve to be thoroughly scolded for this kind "slight of hand" specification. Stick to the truth... we can handle it!!! was a little tight to enable them to stay under 2:1 across thi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00095.html (9,274 bytes)

4. [TowerTalk] Force12 (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 10:12:08 -0400
Yes I would... if I were specifying bandwidth, since there is obviously no such thing as a "standard" length of cable. Why 100', why not 200', or 300' which I use, not to mention different transmissi
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00101.html (11,133 bytes)

5. [TowerTalk] Is it worth it to move 2El Quad from 50ft to 100ft????? (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 10:15:31 -0400
If you only have one antenna at a fixed height it is! Sure, there are circumstances where a lower antenna will outperform a higher antenna, but a higher antenna gives better access to the longer pat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00334.html (9,598 bytes)

6. [TowerTalk] Is it worth it to move 2El Quad from 50ft to 100ft????? (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 12:52:42 -0400
I agree... for stuff I need to work (not E or relatively short F, most of which I've worked ) my antenna at 150 almost always beat the antenna at 50'. Remember, this is DXing generally, not contestin
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00339.html (10,309 bytes)

7. [TowerTalk] Is it worth it to move 2El Quad from 50ft to 100ft????? (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 12:07:00 -0400
If you only have one antenna at a fixed height it is! Sure, there are circumstances where a lower antenna will outperform a higher antenna, but a higher antenna gives better access to the longer pat
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-10/msg00353.html (9,596 bytes)

8. [TowerTalk] HDR300 (score: 1)
Author: Mel Martin" <mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 06:23:59 -0400
Not normal. Sounds like the keyway slot on the clamp platform has enlarged over time. The new "A" model adresses this I belieeve with a larger keyway. Stavking narrow VHF/UHF beams with a large HF an
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-09/msg00571.html (7,103 bytes)

9. [TowerTalk] Anybody try the F12 XR49 or XR51 (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 09:55:24 -0400
Well I'm finally replacing the beams I lost in the Ice storm of '98. I have a 150' guyed tower with a HyGain HDR300A, and I'm wondering what to put on top. That XR49 looks interesting! Anyone tried i
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00014.html (8,245 bytes)

10. [TowerTalk] Anybody try the F12 XR49 or XR51 (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001 13:25:20 -0400
That's what I meant... List Sponsor: Are you thinking about installing a tower this summer? Call us for information on our fabulous Trylon Titan self-supporting towers - up to 96-feet for less than $
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00023.html (7,931 bytes)

11. [TowerTalk] Stacking the HyGain 105/155/205CA (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 11:13:49 -0400
HAs anyone actually modeled this stack? I have these antennas in the basement for years, but never installed them because of the complications of stacking them. I'm just wondering how there performan
/archives//html/Towertalk/2001-06/msg00135.html (7,463 bytes)

12. [TowerTalk] Tower construction (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 1999 09:50:06 -0500
Reading the mail, it seems many of the popular towers in the States use tubular legs. We tend to use different brands up in Canada, and it seems to me construction is more commonly using open L shape
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00114.html (7,671 bytes)

13. [TowerTalk] Tower construction (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 1999 10:29:04 -0500
The L&R towers use legs that make a 60deg angle, not 90deg. They are 3 sided. They also make tubular towers, I believe. The one I use (LR20) is pretty popular up here with amateurs. I believe it is t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00142.html (9,006 bytes)

14. [TowerTalk] 205BA vs 205CA (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 12:40:14 -0500
There are a number of differences. The BA model had problems with front-to-back in the real world. It's performance was less consistant than the 204BA. The 205CA has had a number of changes made to t
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-12/msg00497.html (7,175 bytes)

15. [TowerTalk] Pro-96-S & Pro-96 (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 1999 11:46:37 -0400
Re Pro-96-S: Has anyone actually tried this monster? Re: Pro-96: This might be a more reasonable alternative, but I've heard conflicting reports of it's performance. Anyone care to pass on their firs
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00084.html (6,991 bytes)

16. [TowerTalk] Field Day 40 Antenna Story (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Wed, 07 Jul 1999 16:03:01 -0400
Why bother with a rotating dipole... we've use a simple inverted vee for Field Day for years, and 40M is a bottomless pit of contacts. Directivity is hardly an issue at a height of 30-40 Ft. Crossed
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00119.html (9,405 bytes)

17. [TowerTalk] feeding cables into the shack (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:35:56 -0400
One posibility is to use BNC jumpers... they are perfectly adequate at amateur power levels at HF. -- Mel Martin mel@interlink.net VE2DC -- FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/towertalkfaq.html Sub
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00211.html (6,908 bytes)

18. [TowerTalk] C-32XR, XM24 - rotor (score: 1)
Author: mel@interlink.net (Mel Martin)
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 1999 09:43:39 -0400
The T2X is not up to the job in my opinion. I installed one to turn a 3el Hygain 40M beam, and it lasted less than a week before breaking the main gear. Also the torque is barely adequate. The HDR300
/archives//html/Towertalk/1999-07/msg00212.html (7,637 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu